China is not trying to help Russia, or anybody else. China only helps China. Xi is trying to create an alternative to Pax Americana, realigning as many countries as possible under a new order: Pax Sinica. This what this means: 🧵
China’s model is based on domination, not negotiation. Subscribers to Pax Sinica receive China’s aid without burdensome human rights requirements, but eventually fall into traps that ensure the house always wins. Pax Cynica, no less.
Beijing has decided that now is the time to project its power globally. The so-called peace proposal for Ukraine, mediation between Saudi Arabia and Iran is just the beginning. We cannot now expect to change China’s course by persuasion.
We should remember that attempts to contain Russia by offering economic partnership failed. Putin was in fact emboldened by our flexibility, not persuaded. Similar tactics would also embolden China. Let's not make the same mistake twice.
The lure of Pax Sinica can be diminished if we strengthen the rules-based order that already exists and ensure that it remains the fairest and most reliable proposition for most of the world’s countries.
Preaching de-risking while marching ahead with business-as-usual is not an option. Surely we have learnt that increasing dependencies on totalitarian states weakens us as we discard the principles that made us strong.
We must get serious. De-risking is a much-needed quick fix but we must also be ready for what might follow. We are woefully unprepared for the possibility that Xi’s trajectory might ultimately leave us no choice but to decouple.
Defending all of Ukraine is absolutely the best way to show any potential allies of China that we will always defend the rules-based order that enables stability and therefore prosperity.
To maintain the rules-based order we will have to consider reshaping international political, trade and financial institutions. Where reshaping is not an option, we must consider creating new structures.
Finally, we must be very clear that there will be severe consequences if China tries to violate the rules-based international order. This cannot be empty talk. We must be well prepared for where all of this might take us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We all want peace in Ukraine, but a lasting peace cannot be based on myths. Here are the myths that must be discarded before we can talk about achieving sustainable peace: 🧵
Myth 1: Ukraine is unable to win back all territory including Crimea.
Reality: Ukrainians have shown repeatedly that they can restore territorial integrity, given the necessary weapons and training. Our support can be decisive. The ball is in our court. Ukraine can win.
Myth 2: Russia is unbeatable.
Reality: Ukraine’s allies have only committed a tiny fraction of their resources. Manufacture can be ramped up. The combined Nordic-Baltic GDP alone is bigger than Russia’s. Russia could and should be defeated.
The thing that holds us back is fear. We are afraid of what will happen if Russia actually loses this war. 🧵
There is no win-win scenario in Ukraine. For the foundations of international law to survive, Ukrainians must regain and retain 100% of their territory and sovereignty.
If we fully and finally accept that Russia has to lose in order for us to avoid future wars, then I believe all the other questions about support for Ukraine will be much easier to answer.
Why aren’t we sending Ukraine all the tools needed to end the war? Why are we avoiding specifics during the debate on Ukraine‘s membership of NATO? Because the belief is still alive that after the war we can return to business as usual, as if February 24th was just a glitch.
The tactic of leaving Russia undefeated and ready for future partnership is toxic. It leads to calls to end the war by negotiation instead of ending it with a Ukrainian victory. Some even suggest Ukrainian territorial concessions to the invaders as a gift.
That isn’t how the rules-based international order works. Russia shouldn’t get invited to ‘peace’ negotiations as a reward for brutally invading, occupying and murdering its neighbours again and again.
Longer-range coastal defences in the Black Sea along with military escorts for shipping would boost Ukraine's economy, secure grain exports and avert a global food crisis.🧵
Sooner or later we will inevitably have to strengthen security in the Black Sea, especially if Putin refuses to renew the "Grain for Peace" deal in November, which he is already threatening to do.
Judging by past performance and knowing that he is open to using starvation as a weapon, it seems likely that Putin will again try to blackmail the world by blockading Ukraine's grain this winter.
Putin’s genocidal plan to wipe Ukraine off the map has failed. He is in no position to negotiate. The war must end with his unconditional surrender. 🧵
Ukraine’s heroes have exceeded our expectations daily. Thanks to the inspiring leadership of @ZelenskyyUa, @DmytroKuleba, @oleksiireznikov and others the definition of impossible has been rewritten.
Ukraine has earnt nothing less than our full support in bringing Putin to justice for each and every crime he has committed. There can be no compromises, excuses or exceptions.