Supercharge your paper submissions with 5 powerful LaTeX snippets.
I've perfected them in 10,000+ hours of coding.
Unlock the secret to lightning-fast paper editing. ↓
1. Use the right documentclass options before submitting your paper to CHI
How it works:
- Comment out this line of code with % \documentclass[sigconf,authordraft]{acmart}
- Then add \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review, anonymous]{acmart}
This is the right review format.
2. Format nicer-looking research questions
How it works:
Load in LaTeX doc header:
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage[shortlabels]{enumitem}
Type in LaTeX doc body:
\begin{enumerate}[label= \textbf{RQ\arabic*:}]
\item x
\end{enumerate}
3. Make sure to always define acronyms before use
How it works:
Load in LaTeX doc header:
\usepackage[nolist]{acronym}
Define acronyms:
\begin{acronym}
\acro{ANOVA}{Analysis of Variance}
\end{acronym}
Write the acronym in your text like this:
"We conducted an \ac{ANOVA}."
4. Create pretty quotes for qualitative findings
How it works:
Define a new command called \quoting:
\newcommand{\quoting}[2][P]{``\emph{#2}''\emph{[\textbf{#1}]}}
Use the command like this to quote participants:
\quoting[P13]{This prototype rocked my world.}.
TL;DR: 5 drops of my secret LaTeX sauce to write smooth #chi2023 papers
1. Use the right documentclass options for submission 2. Format nicer-looking RQs 3. Always define acronyms before use 4. Create pretty quotes for qualitative findings 5. Leave highlighted comments
Done like disco.
If you enjoyed this thread:
1. Follow me @acagamic for more tips on writing research papers 2. Join more than a thousand people on my newsletter (link in profile).
Here's the perfect formula to write a literature review paragraph.
A great literature review paragraph needs exactly 2 components.
Most students think every paper needs its own paragraph.
Completely off the mark.
The secret?
Combine synthesis + evaluation:
• Find papers with similar findings
• Group them under one theme
• Connect everything together
• Add critique for each study
Example:
Bad:
"Smith (2020) studied caffeine. Jones (2021) also studied caffeine."
Good:
"Studies show caffeine boosts performance in endurance athletes (Smith, 2020; Jones, 2021), though dosage timing remains debated. While Smith found pre-workout intake optimal, Jones demonstrated mid-workout consumption produced stronger results in elite runners."
See the difference?
One uses contrasting to tell a story.
One just glances over the studies.
A systematic review requires exhaustive, comprehensive searching with quality assessment criteria, while a rapid review can be completed with time-limited formal quality assessment. The difference is months of work.
According to this paper, 14 literature review types exist.
→ You need thorough certainty
→ Time isn't the main factor
→ Quality is everything
Pick rapid when:
→ You need quick insights
→ Time drives decisions
→ Good enough works
Don't overcomplicate this.
Your timeline decides.
Source: Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Which review type fits your project?
Join 6,913+ researchers if you like snack-sized research tips like this: go.lennartnacke.com/newsletter
Chat PDF in Paperpal just changed how I read research papers.
Just uploaded a systematic review paper and my jaw dropped.
Here's what happened:
1. Instant paper breakdown
• Title, authors, DOI extracted automatically
• Smart summary generated in seconds
• Key sections identified and linked
• Research questions pulled out precisely
2. Smart paper connections
• Found relevant papers I hadn't discovered
• Connected papers across different fields
• Added them to my library with one click
• Surfaced hidden relationships
But the real magic? The built-in question engine.
Instead of scrolling endlessly, I clicked "Provide a summary of the discussion section" and got 6 key points with direct links to my source text.
Want to try something powerful?
Upload your PDF and ask:
• "What are the main findings?"
• "Describe the methodology"
• "List the research questions"
It finds answers instantly, with links to the exact paper sections to double-check.