April 6th, 2023: @Twitter has been randomly shutting down API access for many apps and sadly we were affected today too. Hopefully we will be restored soon! We appreciate your patience until then.
Like, hey, if you're going to do something like that, maybe, I don't know, try to get at least some sort of concession out of it? Some sort of baseline protections?
But nah, nothing, just "Hey, maybe we'll offer a little anti-trans policy as a treat."
As I've written before, I'm of the opinion that the sports stuff is complicated, especially as it concerns elite competition readtpa.com/p/lia-thomas-t…
But at this point, with states just implementing policies that totally obliterate trans people's rights to more or less exist (Kansas is trying to make it illegal for trans people to update their names, even -- theguardian.com/us-news/2023/a…), why...
...be like, "Welp, let's tell them that a little anti-trans policy is actually endorsed by the White House"? We are so far past "sports" in the list of priorities here, and the administration seems to (at best) just not get it.
Anyway, I see that Jeff Zients is just doing exactly what we've come to expect from him. Dude is going to destroy Biden's presidency by pushing him to the right.
(Pushing things to the right post-Klain is exactly what Biden brought Zients in to do)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A day after @SubstackInc announced its own Twitter-like service called Notes, Twitter seems to now be blocking the ability to embed tweets within Substack posts.
And I don't know. Okay, I guess?
Quite literally the worst thing about Twitter these days (in my opinion) is that things change on a total whim. Every day, we open the site to find something new that has changed for no clear reason.
Oh, you changed the logo to an ancient meme? Okay.
Oh, NPR is "state media" now? But actual US state media isn't labeled "state media"? Because NPR had a story about eating bugs? Okay, whatever.
Oh, tweeting the word "tr@/ns" will get posts deboosted? Sure, why not.
I'm not going to shut up about this, either. I've been pushed to my limit, and I'm done as wealthy media elites like @Sulliview ignore the anti-trans bias in media. She's never written about this, and then when shown one of the most egregious examples of bias I've seen, shrugged.
So I am going to be a noisy pain in the ass until she explains why she won't do her job and cover anti-trans bias. I get that @Sulliview works for The Guardian, which is part of the problem (massively biased against trans people, thanks to the awful EIC over there).
Apropos of nothing, I'd just like to point out that my analysis of Fox News and the direction it would take post-2020 was spot on. mediamatters.org/voter-fraud-an…
Meanwhile, Very Serious Media People who all had/received columnist jobs after the election, completely botched it by arguing Fox would moderate itself.
🤷🏻♀️
Compare my post-2020 Fox News presiction (it was going to go even more off the rails) to that of @Sulliview (maybe Fox will become more moderate) washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/medi…
There's a tweet from someone who is someone I idolize in the world of media criticism that has been bothering me for a few days now, and I'm just so frustrated by all of it.
Like... look at that last tweet. Why is one of the world's most influential media critics just brushing off the fact that media elites have all just decided that breaches of basic journalistic ethics don't matter when they concern trans people?
"I can't take this on."
Maybe you should. But hey, sure, let's instead get the millionth column about how Trump is a "master media manipulator," instead. Definitely a fresh angle on that.