Prof Norman Fenton Profile picture
Apr 9, 2023 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1. Reminder of what ‘net zero’ really means. This graphic from UK Govt FIRES project. Key points: all airports except Heathrow, Belfast & Glasgow to close by 2030. NO FLYING at all by 2050. No new petrol/diesel cars by 2030; by 2050 road use restricted to 60% of today’s level. Image
2. Food, heating and energy restricted to 60% of today’s level by 2050. That means either a colder, hungrier population or massive depopulation. To those who think this is conspiracy theory here is the Govt approved document:
repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/hand…
3. Of course '15 minute cities' now being pushed everywhere are key to all of this. As I said in 2020 the covid lockdowns were always going to be the precursor for climate lockdowns
4. It's quite amusing that several people have jumped in with replies that this is 'all made up' and has 'been debunked many times'. The link to the actual document was in the thread but I'll repeat it: repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/hand…
5. Many well funded organisations are committed to the same UN/WEF nonsense:
6. Rosa Koire’s 2011 book revealed the whole green agenda scam. Everything that’s happening now is explained there
7. This important report by Michael J Kelly (FRS FREng
Emeritus Prince Philip Professor of Technology, Univ of Cambridge) explains why the net zero agenda will come unstuck for want of manpower, materials, money & popular buy-in.
thegwpf.org/content/upload…
8. And for those who still think the absolute zero agenda is not baked in to Govt thinking, note that it only differs from the official net zero agenda in its 2030 objectives (i.e. the speed at which it must happen). The 2050 objectives are the same.
9. As the FIRES consortium makes clear, without novel greenhouse gas capture/removal technologies net zero emissions can only be achieved by absolute zero emissions.
10. Prof Michael Kelly's report shows why the UK Govt funded FIRES project strategy requires a stop to all air travel by 2050 to meet the Govt's net zero target: Image
11. In other words, the inhumane FIRES project strategy is simply a realistic statement of what is required to meet the UK Govt's insane net zero 2050 target as enshrined in the 2019 Climate Change Act amendment (which every political party supported but nobody voted for)
12. The USA is also committed to net zero by 2050 as confirmed by this State Dept document "The Long-Term Strategy of the United States: Pathways
to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050" whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
13. My interview with @IngrahamAngle on Fox News about this report
14. And last night NTD News picked up the story and interviewed me aout it
ntd.com/climate-change…
15. This article explains why transport is particularly difficult to decarbonize and current policies focusing entirely on battery electric vehicles will not and must not succeed.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
16. And for those doubting the veracity of all this, here’s the original twitter thread by @UKFIRES from 2 years ago confirming everything I said. These people are serious. £5million UK Govt funding.
17. And apparently they now think they were being too OPTIMISTIC 🤡🌎..😁😁😁 Image
18. If you still don’t believe the elites will restrict meat and dairy eating watch especially the segments of the New York mayor talking here. And note that London mayor Sadiq Khan is his partner in this WEF initiative
thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-orders-gov…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Norman Fenton

Prof Norman Fenton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @profnfenton

May 15
1. This is quite a long thred and the new explosive information is in part 3 of the thread.
In June 2023 I reported about how a talk I was due to give at the NHS Health and Care Analytics Conference 2023 was cancelled not because of its content (it was about Bayesian network applications) but because of my ‘controversial views’ about the covid vaccines.

In July 2023 I reported on the heavily redacted response from Birmingham University (who were hosting the conference) to my subject access request. In August 2023 I reported on the astonishing response from the NHS to an FOI request that somebody, who I did not know, had made about the cancellation.

All these reports are on our blog wherearethenumbers (the one that X shadow bans links to ...)
2. After that I finally got a response from the NHS to my own subject access request about the cancellation. For legal reasons I never reported on that or what happened thereafter because The Free Speech Union lawyers submitted a formal request for an apology on my behalf and a small payment to a charity. Because there has as yet been no resolution there are still limits to what I can say publicly. But I can reveal some snippets of what the NHS and their lawyers said.

The NHS response to the subject access request contained a covering letter and 17 different heavily redacted documents, each of which contained a thread of one or more emails about me. Four of the documents were simply email threads in which I had participated before and after the cancellation - so nothing new there. Nine of the documents were correspondence from, presumably, members of the public who had made formal complaints to the NHS about my cancellation.

It was nice to know that people had complained on my behalf, but the most interesting aspect of the exchange was that the documents contained no responses from the NHS and no information as to whether the NHS ever did reply to these complaints.

The remaining four documents were internal communications announcing, and later confirming, that my talk was cancelled, instructing people to remove my name, close down the associated Eventbrite announcement, etc. Hence, there was little new in the subject access request response to shed light on the real reasons and process that led up to their decision to cancel my appearance. And, to this day, the Conference Chair Ben Goldacre has refused to respond to any of the multiple requests for information about this...
3. However, following the Free Speech Union letter the NHS lawyers sent a lengthy response that contained many remarkable and offensive statements about me. First, they explicitly referred to tweets I had made AFTER the cancellation announcement on 20 June 2023. They stated (in point 6 of their letter):

Since 20 June 2023, the Defendant has been aware that the Claimant also maintains an active profile on Twitter as a controversialist. For example, in recent weeks, he has repeatedly tweeted arguments against the conviction of NHS nurse Lucy Letby for the murder of seven babies. He is a climate crisis denier, tweeting and retweeting about climate change as “climate catastrophe propaganda” and criticising “the tyrannical Net Zero policies being foisted upon us all under the guise of solving the non-existent ‘global boiling crisis’”.

While I certainly stand by the claims about “climate catastrophe propaganda”, the statement that I “repeatedly tweeted arguments against the conviction of NHS nurse Lucy Letby for the murder of seven babies.” is false. It seems to be based on the fact that I had simply posted a video interview I made with a colleague who raised concerns about the conviction and followed that up with links to his articles about it.

In point 7, apart from the fact that they object to tweets which simply state the truth about covid, they bizarrely imply that I am some kind of Hitler fan for using the ‘clown world’ icons in tweets. This is despite the fact that I had very publicly stated in a viral video in March 2023 that I was a Jew whose father was the sole survivor in his large family of the Nazi Holocaust:

The Claimant’s tweets about Covid 19 are less moderate than his “position” as expressed in your letter. He tweets allegations that the “mainstream media” or “MSM” has lied about Covid, that death tolls have been inflated and even that there has not been a pandemic. For example, he tweeted that the “MSM” have “frame[d] Trump as a liar when he was the one telling the truth about it”. He regularly ends his tweets about Covid with the clown emoji followed by the world emoji, meaning “clown world” (“🤡🌏”). This is an alt-right internet meme, which originated in 4chan and is also known as the “Honkler” or “Heil Honkler” sign1 within the American white supremacist movement. Honkler joins “Honk” with “Hitler”. It is a dog whistle conveying that “the left” are creating a “clown world”.

The reference to Trump above concerned the media’s response to his statement in 2020 that he believed the claimed 3.4% covid fatality rate was too high. Trump was of course right, and the mainstream media were wrong.

In point 8 they attempt to paint me as an ignorant anti-vaxxer, and totally misrepresent some tweets I posted:

In particular, the Claimant often tweets inflammatory messages condemning the basic interventions supported by the NHS and health services all over the world. This includes explicitly anti-Vaxx tweets, not only challenging vaccination for younger age groups (as mentioned in your letter) but for all age groups. For example, he recently tweeted about the NHS winter Covid booster campaign, which only targets older age groups and those at risk: “They’ll repeat the mantra ‘they stop hospitalisation & death’. So, here’s a reminder of why that’s garbage too.” In the same tweet thread, he stated “every Covid test is an unnecessary medical intervention”, accompanied by a child’s face, crying and covered in blood.

The explanation for my cancellation is contained in point 11 of their letter, which amusingly refers to The Great Reset as a ‘well-known covid conspiracy theory’

On 20 June 2023, the HACA Conference organisers were in an internal meeting when a Twitter user tweeted at them asking if they had seen the Claimant’s Twitter feed and suggesting that they should take a look. Some present at the meeting immediately did so and were very concerned by what they saw, which included sensationalist material, dog whistles and conspiracy theories. For example, they saw a tweet praising a project to “disrupt global tyranny”, advertised by the slogan “resist the great reset”, which refers to a well-known covid conspiracy theory. They saw another tweet alleging that “data scams have sustained ‘official’ narratives” in respect of Covid. Those present at the meeting felt the implication of many of the tweets was the NHS and Government is actively lying about harming patients with COVID vaccines as part of a globalist takeover of democratic governments. It was decided that inviting the Claimant to speak at this NHS conference would be inappropriate and would conflict in a damaging way with the NHS position on vaccination. They were also concerned that inviting the Claimant would implicitly endorse his public persona, which might deter NHS staff from attending the conference.

In Points 18 and 20 they provide the following further rationale for the cancellation:

First, and most importantly, the decision furthers the objective of protection of health. All NHS bodies (and UK public authorities more widely) maintain clear and consistent messaging on the importance of vaccination against Covid 19 and other diseases. Since the pandemic, there has been a significant rise in the anti-Vaxx movement, which in turn risks jeopardising the vital public health benefits of high vaccine uptake. There are grave public health risks arising from any declining trust in vaccines and in NHS advice more generally. Put bluntly, a refusal to accept vaccination risks lives. The anti-Vaxx and Covid-sceptic movement has been fuelled by the kind of inflammatory tweets found on the Claimant’s Twitter feed. As is well known, media platforms (particularly social media platforms such as Twitter) have been enormously influential in the spread of vaccine hesitancy. Such platforms have been used to spread widespread disinformation about the effectiveness or safety of vaccination both by individuals and by hostile state actors such as Russia. The influence of commentary upon social media platforms is magnified, where those who post on such platforms speak from a position of apparent authority.

Second, the decision furthers the objective of the protection of the MLSCU’s reputation. MLSCU’s functions include advancing innovation and research within the NHS. In order to carry out this function effectively, it needs to maintain the trust of NHS professionals. It does this by inviting credible individuals to share their research. While the Claimant has conducted well-respected research as an academic, his public profile contains extremist, controversialist positions, including alt-right memes and conspiracy theories. MLSCU was entitled to take the view that its own reputation and ability to carry out its functions could be undermined by hosting the Claimant. Further, any erosion in the credibility of the MLSCU could have an indirect adverse impact on the protection of health, if NHS professionals were to forego the opportunity to access important research shared by the MLSCU.

Further reasons are provided in points 27, 28:

The decision is justified by reference to his inflammatory and controversialist profile on Twitter, covering a wide range of subjects on which the Claimant has no particular academic expertise and expressed in a style that extends to far right dog whistles. Both the content and style of large numbers of tweets by the Claimant mean that they clearly are not “academic expression”.This decision addresses the risk that placing the Claimant on an NHS platform would be reported or perceived by anti-Vaxxers and the public as an endorsement of his extreme statements on Twitter, as well as leading to potential loss of trust in MLCSU. This risk would subsist regardless of whether he spoke on these issues at the conference. There would be no way of ensuring that the Claimant’s presence at the conference was always reported on social media with a relevant disclaimer.
Read 4 tweets
May 8
1. With the formal withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine it's appropriate to remind people of this double page spread in The Times, March 2021 that hailed the AstraZeneca vaccine as 100% effective. But note the article highlighted bottom right ....... Image
2. ...the article by Tom Whipple has headline:
“Academics back ‘bizarre’ claim that jabs may kill”
The online version of this article explicitly named me as one of the academics.
Image
Image
3. While I'm proud we raised the alarm about safety issues with the vaccines so early on, Whipple's article was inaccurate, but was used as the basis for my Wikipedia entry to be hacked with me being labelled as spreading ‘covid-19 misinformation’:

normanfenton.com/post/how-wikip…
Read 4 tweets
Nov 26, 2023
1 .@TRobinsonNewEra has done more to wake up the British public to dangers of antisemitism and Israelophobia than any of Britain’s ‘official Jews’. The role of CAA @antisemitism in his arrest today is a disgrace & diverted attention away from what the rally was about.
Those 'official Jews' don't represent beliefs of majority of ordinary British Jew. If they'd listened to @TRobinsonNewEra's warnings, instead of helping censor & demonise, him antisemites & Israel haters wouldn't be running riot in our streets each week
3. In contrast to their treatment of @TRobinsonNewEra (who has always supported the Jewish community & Israel) the 'official Jews' have often cosied up to Islamists & extreme Leftists who continue to express hatred of Israel & contempt for Jews.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 12, 2023
1. Look at what we found in the House of Commons (Portcullis House entrance) today. A display taking over much of the concourse area promoting Agenda 21/WEF talking points on 'democracy'. Like this "Democracy is intertwined with tackling climate change"> Image
2. Here is what is in the leaflets being handed out (note this is sponsored by "The Speaker" (of the House of Commons).
Image
Image
3. The org behind this is the Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD). From their latest annual report it's clear this is mainly UK Govt funded. In 2022-23 their expenditure was over twice their income - they have 55 full time employees) all underwritten by UK tax payers
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 22, 2023
1. Some researchers & legal scholars are expressing concerns about the #LucyLetby trial. Today I interviewed one such prominent researcher @LawHealthTech to discuss his concerns
2. The concerns of @gill1109 are that the errors in previous 'killer nurse' cases may have been repearted here
mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/5…
Image
@gill1109 3. See also
gill1109.com/2023/05/24/the…
Read 5 tweets
Aug 6, 2023
1. Since censorship/poor treatment following things people said on twitter is a current hot issue, I decided to make this my new pinned tweet. It's the email I got announcing the cancellation of my invited talk at a big NHS conference in July 2023. Image
2. And here's just a small number of examples of how the #muttoncrew attempted to get me sacked from my job at Queen Mary University of London simply for retweeting a report about the dangers of the covid vaxx for pregnant women Image
3. This is one of my favourites: Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(