1. This is quite a long thred and the new explosive information is in part 3 of the thread.
In June 2023 I reported about how a talk I was due to give at the NHS Health and Care Analytics Conference 2023 was cancelled not because of its content (it was about Bayesian network applications) but because of my ‘controversial views’ about the covid vaccines.

In July 2023 I reported on the heavily redacted response from Birmingham University (who were hosting the conference) to my subject access request. In August 2023 I reported on the astonishing response from the NHS to an FOI request that somebody, who I did not know, had made about the cancellation.

All these reports are on our blog wherearethenumbers (the one that X shadow bans links to ...) 2. After that I finally got a response from the NHS to my own subject access request about the cancellation. For legal reasons I never reported on that or what happened thereafter because The Free Speech Union lawyers submitted a formal request for an apology on my behalf and a small payment to a charity. Because there has as yet been no resolution there are still limits to what I can say publicly. But I can reveal some snippets of what the NHS and their lawyers said.

The NHS response to the subject access request contained a covering letter and 17 different heavily redacted documents, each of which contained a thread of one or more emails about me. Four of the documents were simply email threads in which I had participated before and after the cancellation - so nothing new there. Nine of the documents were correspondence from, presumably, members of the public who had made formal complaints to the NHS about my cancellation.

It was nice to know that people had complained on my behalf, but the most interesting aspect of the exchange was that the documents contained no responses from the NHS and no information as to whether the NHS ever did reply to these complaints.

The remaining four documents were internal communications announcing, and later confirming, that my talk was cancelled, instructing people to remove my name, close down the associated Eventbrite announcement, etc. Hence, there was little new in the subject access request response to shed light on the real reasons and process that led up to their decision to cancel my appearance. And, to this day, the Conference Chair Ben Goldacre has refused to respond to any of the multiple requests for information about this...

1. With the formal withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine it's appropriate to remind people of this double page spread in The Times, March 2021 that hailed the AstraZeneca vaccine as 100% effective. But note the article highlighted bottom right ....... 2. ...the article by Tom Whipple has headline:
“Academics back ‘bizarre’ claim that jabs may kill”
The online version of this article explicitly named me as one of the academics.

1 .@TRobinsonNewEra has done more to wake up the British public to dangers of antisemitism and Israelophobia than any of Britain’s ‘official Jews’. The role of CAA @antisemitism in his arrest today is a disgrace & diverted attention away from what the rally was about.

https://twitter.com/metpoliceuk/status/1728776275022516390

Those 'official Jews' don't represent beliefs of majority of ordinary British Jew. If they'd listened to @TRobinsonNewEra's warnings, instead of helping censor & demonise, him antisemites & Israel haters wouldn't be running riot in our streets each week

https://x.com/ScoopUrban/status/1728837221103342058?s=20

1. Look at what we found in the House of Commons (Portcullis House entrance) today. A display taking over much of the concourse area promoting Agenda 21/WEF talking points on 'democracy'. Like this "Democracy is intertwined with tackling climate change"> 2. Here is what is in the leaflets being handed out (note this is sponsored by "The Speaker" (of the House of Commons).

1. Some researchers & legal scholars are expressing concerns about the #LucyLetby trial. Today I interviewed one such prominent researcher @LawHealthTech to discuss his concerns 2. The concerns of @gill1109 are that the errors in previous 'killer nurse' cases may have been repearted here
mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/5…

1. Since censorship/poor treatment following things people said on twitter is a current hot issue, I decided to make this my new pinned tweet. It's the email I got announcing the cancellation of my invited talk at a big NHS conference in July 2023. 2. And here's just a small number of examples of how the #muttoncrew attempted to get me sacked from my job at Queen Mary University of London simply for retweeting a report about the dangers of the covid vaxx for pregnant women

1. I strongly recommend people follow @LawHealthTech for coverage of the Lucy Letby case (she is the nurse accused of murdering babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester). The full reports are on the substack:

https://t.co/BoKdFevuhMlawhealthandtech.substack.com/p/ll-part-5-th…
2. This case is also being monitored by @gill1109 with whom @david_lagnado and I wrote this paper about certain previous 'killer nurse' cases
doi.org/10.3390/laws11…

1. I just had the privilege of meeting and doing a short interview with Dr Heiko Schöning who was famously arrested in Hyde Park in London for talking to people about covid 2. You can follow Heiko on telegram t.me/heiko_schoening and find it all out in his book here

1. Finally Sheldrick has been forced to apologise for his fraud claim against @drpaulmarik1. Sheldrick is one of a group of 'scientists' who've been trying to discredit anybody who challenged the 'official' covid narrative. We showed his 'analysis' was based on ignorance.

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1663102844143296512

2. Our original article (now updated with today's news) that showed just how ludicrous Sheldrick's claims were is here:
wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-curious-…

But the BBC uses Sheldrick and his cronies as authoritative sources for 'debunking covid misinformation'

1. My only ever interaction with @mariannaspring was to reply to her tweet about her "Verify!" initiative with a thread about misinformation in BBC documentary #unvaccinated that @nazarinveronica & @vickyborman could ask her to investigate. Naz & Vicky both said they wanted to 2. She didn't reply to requests from Naz & Vicky (victims of BBC misinformation). And here's her response to me. I normally block back if I don't know them .. but there's no point here as @mariannaspring boasted of having multiple fake accounts who follow dissenters 🤡🌎

1. Since twitter pushed this garbage on to my timeline, I may as well suggest that one of the first things "BBC Verify?" should investigate are the many mistruths and hate propagated in its own documentary "Unvaccinated" screened July 2022

https://twitter.com/mariannaspring/status/1660557049376256000

2. A particularly serious example were these ludicrous claims made by Dr Mehool Patel which went unchallenged in the programme:

1. Within 60 seconds of me uploading this 2-minute clip about the AstraZeneca vaccine (from my testimony to the Corona Investigative Committee, Germany) YouTube removed it and gave me a strike: 2. I asked @YouTube which claims in the video “contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or the World Health Organisation (WHO)”:

1. The MHRA is not fit for purpose. This is a slide from a recent talk by June Raine (CEO of MHRA). It supposedly shows the number of Yellow Card reports (of adverse reactions to drugs/vaccines) per 100K of the population by region. 2. Can it possibly be correct that the number of reports DECREASED in 2021 - the year the covid vaccines were introduced? The slide suggests about 43 reports per 100K UK population in 2021. That's about 2,800 total reports for the whole UK.

1. Reminder of what ‘net zero’ really means. This graphic from UK Govt FIRES project. Key points: all airports except Heathrow, Belfast & Glasgow to close by 2030. NO FLYING at all by 2050. No new petrol/diesel cars by 2030; by 2050 road use restricted to 60% of today’s level. 2. Food, heating and energy restricted to 60% of today’s level by 2050. That means either a colder, hungrier population or massive depopulation. To those who think this is conspiracy theory here is the Govt approved document:
repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/hand…

1. With conservative assumptions made about YellowCard reporting in my latest article we estimate there was 1 death per 5348 doses of Astra Zeneca vaxx. No surprise it was quitely 'withdrawn' in UK - even before Dame Sarah Gilbert got that standing ovation at Wimbledon for it 2. Some personal evidence of the extent of under-reporting of vaxx deaths in Yellow Card system.

1. The response to my subject access information request for @TheLancet internal correspondence discussing our letter re flawed Pfizer study was heavily redacted. But this thread will show that even unredacted bits reveal their unprofessional behaviour wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-lancet-h… 2. It's clear I was being discussed in a negative light as they were referring to me as 'an ongoing issue'. Also clear they only reached out after I publicised their initial delayed rejection letter on twitter (they were getting a lot of heat as a result of that).

1. So @VikiLovesFACS is now publicly calling me a ‘rabid misinformation merchant’ and seems upset that I’m not being ‘censured’ or losing my job (I’m retired now incidentally). But what about her claim she has no Pharma COIs?…… 2. I refer you to this interesting thread that challenges that claim:

https://twitter.com/VaccineMole/status/1634372895638953985

1. Most vaxxed patients in UK hospitals in winter 2021-22 were wrongly classified as unvaxxed resulting in false claim that it was mainly unvaxxed in ICUs and dying of covid.
Here’s how the BBC Documentary #Unvaccinated exploited that claim 2. Here the actual clip from #Unvaccinated
@nazarinveronica @vickyborman

1. The claim that it was mainly the unvaccinated overwhelming hospitals and dying of covid in late 2021 was just another scam to scare people into getting vaxxed. wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/claims-the-u… 2. The mantra that 'vaccines might not stop infection but they stop you getting seriously ill and dying of covid' was, like the whole official narrative, based on flawed statistics.

1. More details of the tricks that were used to produce the fraudulent "95% effective" claim for the Pfizer vaxx
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbionte… 2. The handling of 'suspected but uncomfirmed' cases is especially revealing. This is from page 41 of the FDA memorandum. Note especially that - in the first 7 days post-vaxx - there were 409 such 'cases' in the vaxx arm compared to just 287 in the placebo arm.

1.After a delay of 7 months to get it right, it seems the ONS report/data on deaths by vaccination status (as reported here by .@ClareCraigPath is just as flawed as the previous ones we have criticised...

https://twitter.com/ClareCraigPath/status/1628030810493263875

2. This exchange between .@joshg99 and .@SarahCaul_ONS is quite revealing regarding something we have previously said is happening (namely those dying shortly after first dose are classified as unvaxxed etc)

https://twitter.com/joshg99/status/1628037793162174464