🧵(1/21) on research & policy. Today @NeilDotBrien (Minister for Primary Care & Public Health) announced the roll out of a national incentive scheme in 🏴 for #smokingcessation in #pregnancy. This is underpinned by 20 years of studies & teamwork. Reflections on #lessonslearned
Building the evidence for prevention policies like this take time, but if the evidence is robust, wider societal shifts are in favour, you work with funders, respected #advocacy partners, research participants and experienced civil servants it can happen. gov.uk/government/new…
2003. I was a lecturer @uofglasgow. I met an experienced paediatrician, Prof David Tappin. He had worked for years w. @CotDeathTrust & was committed to reducing still births & infant mortality. He knew smoking in pregnancy harmed mothers & babies & wanted to do more to prevent it
Most women who smoke quit when they find out they are pregnant. But that can be very difficult. If you have little money, poor support, a partner who smokes and maybe your own mother did in pregnancy, it’s not easy. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
Early studies in the USA of providing women with a small incentive, and sometimes their partner also remember, these are often couples with limited resources) were promising. Systematic review of studies up to 2010 here: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
2005 David & I & others started to work with @theGCPH where the Director, Prof @CarolTannahill, was interested in finding out more about why smoking in pregnancy rates were so much higher in deprived areas we started several years work with GCPH & @NHSGGC gcph.co.uk/children_and_f…
2007 an early pioneer, Dr Andrew Radley @AndrRadl (Consultant in PH @NHSTayside) set up ‘Give it Up for Baby’ providing a £15 ASDA voucher to pregnant women who signed up to stop smoking service support. Local evaluation findings supported his approach. nhstayside.scot.nhs.uk/OurServicesA-Z…
2006-2012. Our early work with @TheGCPH progressed to a pilot trial co-funded by @CSO_Scotland involving 612 pregnant smokers in Glasgow. Results were hugely promising. Results here: bmj.com/content/350/bm…
We involved health economists Prof Andy Briggs & @Kathleenannboyd. They found that incentives - staged throughout pregnancy & amounting to £400 resulting in over double the quit rate at end of pregnancy compared to usual care were cost effective onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ad…
2012. A pilot trial isn’t usually enough to change guidance. The Smoking in Pregnancy Challenge Group, coordinated by @ASHOrgUK @HazelCheeseman took up the mantel & is a tireless advocate for change. Honoured to still co-chair this w @CHarmerSands smokefreeaction.org.uk/smokefree-nhs/…
The Challenge Group highlighted work in practice on incentives set up by Andrea Crossfield in the previous regional office for TC in North West England & then progressed at rapid scale across Greater Manchester by @HistoryMakersGM @Coyne4Jane. smokefreeaction.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
2014. Our pilot trial was merged w results of other studies in a @CochraneTAG review (then updated 2017) finding financial incentives were the single most effective intervention to stop pregnant women smoking, particularly when combined behavioural support cochrane.org/CD001055/PREG_…
But we knew a multi-centre trial was needed to change practice. To show that what was found at feasibility & pilot (to follow @The_MRC guidelines) could be transferred to many diff settings & still yield similar results. Securing the funding for this took another several years.😫
2015-17 Cancer Research UK @CRUKResearch, who I was working with, listened & encouraged us to submit an application for competitive funding. This was a rigorous process & the science needed to be top notch. We secured half the funding from them & this helped us approach others.
We then secured the remainder of the funds to proceed @CS0_Scotland @HSC_NI @Nichstweet @CotDeathTrust @LullabyTrust - all subject to competitive peer review and appropriate funding committee deliberations. Plus @SPECTRUMRes @UK_PRP for my time to co-lead the trial.
2017-21 The multi-centre trial was conducted in 7 centres in 🏴, Northern Ireland & 🏴. Huge thanks to Lesley Sinclair trial manager & all those who contributed. We found incentives were still more than 2x as effective for cessation as usual care bmj.com/content/379/bm…
2021: The national health care guideline committee in England @NICEComms considered our pilot trial & (at the time pre-publication) multi-centre trial results, along w @CochraneTAG findings & recommended that incentives be added to stop smoking support nice.org.uk/guidance/ng209…
Throughout there was tireless work by highly experienced civil servants like @Rosanna_OConnor @Switchfinder & many others who worked with different Ministers over years to continue to make the case for effective tobacco control measures & use research evidence to inform action.
2023: National scheme announced *If implemented properly* it will result in NHS savings & better outcomes for mothers & families. When we started this work, my children were babies. They are now young adults. Making the case for prevention takes time, but it is time well spent.
Key reflections from this v long🧵
Researchers can think generating good quality evidence is enough. It's not. It's the relationships, the networks, the funders, practitioners, advocates & participants. What they do is what actually achieves change & makes the research useful 🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot of discussion about separating those at risk to protect them from becoming infected w. SARS-CoV-2. ‘Let’s protect the elderly & vulnerable from Covid19 & the rest of us get on with our lives’. New paper shows how challenging this would be (PREPRINT not peer reviewed) 1/10
Cohort study of 1.3 million residents in Greater Glasgow & Clyde (UK’s largest health authority area). Sample: those registered with GPs in @NHSGGC. Of these, 32,533 (2.47%) in the official ‘shielding’ category but a further 347,374 (26.41%) were classified at moderate risk 3/10
Mass media is a powerful tool to promote public health. Not just campaigns (see our @NIHRresearch funded series of systematic reviews on this) but also for policy makers & professionals to explain why measures, interventions or services are needed 2/9 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54070…
Evidence from well conducted studies shows that sustained communication of public health messages, (including repetition of messages over an extended period) is far more effective than shorter, time limited communication 3/9
Please to see today the release of more data from 🏴Scotland’s #TestandTrace (Test and Protect) via @P_H_S_Official. More to follow. But this is progress. Important for transparency & comparisons within UK & internationally. 1/7 beta.isdscotland.org/find-publicati…
Since 28th May, 1,835 individuals in the system with a positive test & 7,449 contacts traced (around 4 contacts per index case). More detailed data only available from July 21st for the whole country by which point all NHS Boards were using the same Case Management System. 2/7
This means we don’t have more (public) detail on 1,835 individuals and contact tracing linked to them, but instead the 925 in the Case Management System. But very encouraging that 922 of them were successfully reached. This is over 99% of individuals with a positive test. 3/7
*Important document* for Scotland - won’t make the headlines, but publication of Covid-19 Surveillance and Response plan today. Will be key in terms of how the pandemic is monitored and responded to in 🏴the coming months. Key points 1/8 gov.scot/news/monitorin…
Surveillance: Existing and new data, plus information via #TestAndProtect. But from #TestAndProtect we also need to understand % of positive cases successfully contacted, % of identified contacts who could be reached, and whether self-isolation guidance followed 2/8
Data & Intelligence Network - lots of elements here via key agencies @P_H_S_Official, Directors of Public Health @fphscot@NHSScotland@uni_scot & others. Virus Surveillance Dashboards for localities one to watch here - we all need info on what is happening in our local area 3/8
Thinking about this a bit more - the #smokefree#facecoverings comparison. I do think it is relevant, but with caveats. In March 2016 I visited a main railway station in Scotland the day before and the day after the smokefree law came in. 1/5
The day before, people were smoking on the concourse, in cafes at the station and elsewhere. The next day, no one I saw was smoking. Not a single person. The difference was sudden and really noticeable. Plus in time, data showed that overall compliance was strikingly high. 2/5
Last week I visited a local large supermarket. I’d say fewer than one in five people were wearing face coverings. I went back just now, the 2nd day of it being mandatory. Almost everyone, with a couple of exceptions, was wearing a face covering. 3/5
Been meaning to compose a thread to thank all the journalists for the hours they've put in during this #COVID19 pandemic in the UK & further afield. Often working from home, juggling like the rest of us. 1/6
They get a lot of grief but so many are brilliant and a wealth of information & insight. I’m a public health researcher but it’s so difficult to keep up with #COVID19 developments, moving so quickly that I and others simply can’t just rely on academic networks for updates. 2/6
Journalists don’t always get it right and there is ALOT of misinformation out there. But a free press is essential. Let’s not forget how lucky we are to have this in the UK and some, but not all, other countries. 3/6