Dr. Ally Louks's PhD thesis is set to be one of the most influential theses of 21st century. Puts forward an original argument with remarkable clarity.
Already has 85M+ views on X/Twitter.
Most people criticizing her don't understand her argument at all.
I have a PhD in literary studies, and in this thread, we'll do a close reading of her abstract to understand her argument in simple English.
Before we jump in, we need to keep in mind that a PhD thesis is written for a small group of 3-5 scholars.
These scholars serve as a candidate's supervisor and examiners. They are the only audience of a PhD thesis.
If you think you can't understand a PhD thesis, it's because you are not its intended audience.
Let's start with the title:
"Olfactory Ethics: The Politics of Smell in Modern and Contemporary Prose."
There are three important here: ethics, politics, and smell.
Politics here is not used in the sense of running the political affairs of a country. Here, politics means things related to power.
If something reinforces oppressive power strucutres it's considered unethical (e.g. a story that celebrates poor people being discriminated against or getting killed).
If something challenges these power structures, that's considered ethical.
Put simply, the thesis deals with the relationship between smell and power.
In literary studies, we don't look at how things are in the world. That's not our concern. That's the job of anthropologists and sociologists.
Literary scholars look at how things are potrayed in literature. We deal with representations.
This thesis looks at how the relationship between power and smell has been portrayed in modern (1914-1945) and contemporary literature.