Brooks D. Simpson Profile picture
Apr 13 27 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
We are days away from the first round of the #StanleyCupPlayoffs. In many ways the first round is the one that is special and different. All that breaking news ... all those updates ... all those upsets.

Today is the anniversary of my favorite first round day ... in 1982.
In those days the first round was a best of 5 round, and on April 13, 1982, there were three such games to be played to finish that first round.

Each of the three series had come down to deciding games with the three best teams in the league playing at home.
In Montreal, the Canadiens, the third best team in the regular season, faced off against the Quebec Nordiques.

In Edmonton, the Oilers, the second best team in the regular season, were confronting the LA Kings.
Finally, on Long Island, the New York Islanders, who had been the league's best team that season, battled the Pittsburgh Penguins.

Of the three challengers, only the Nordiques had won more than they lost during the regular season.

None of that mattered now.
The games on Long Island and in Montreal would start 90 minutes before the puck would be dropped to start the game in Edmonton, where the Oilers were coming off a win to tie the series the previous evening. Montreal had also won game 4 to tie their series.
After crushing the Pens in the first two games on Long Island, the Isles had dropped both games in Pittsburgh, with Game 3 going to overtime.

So it was an evening of suspense and ripe for upsets.
I was a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin. I was not in a great frame of mind, because the Islanders had let things slip after a great regular season.

So how did the evening unfold?
Let's just say it did not start out well.

After a scoreless first period, the Isles scored first in the second period, with Bob Nystrom, who was returning from injury, performing his usual playoff heroics.

Then the Pens scored three straight goals, and the period ended 3-1.
Quebec broke out to a 2-0 lead in the first period, and it remained that way after two periods.

The Edmonton game started later, with the Kings breaking out to a 2-0 lead in the first, but it was 3-2 Kings after one period.
So, as the Islanders-Penguins game entered the third period, all three favorites were behind in their games.

Montreal rallied first, tying their game in the middle of the third period.

It did not seem that the Islanders would be so lucky.
Then Pittsburgh's Randy Carlyle, that year's winner of the Norris Trophy as the league's best defenseman, was called for holding.

However, the Islanders' power play was struggling.
With about six minutes to go, Al Arbour replaced Billy Smith with Rollie Melanson in goal. Back then you could use this as a time out: this move bought time for players to rest and gather themselves to try to take advantage of the power play.
It worked. Mike McEwen, set up by Bryan Trottier and Mike Bossy, brought the Islanders to within one goal.

But the clock kept moving, counting down the last minutes in what seemed to be the end for the two-time defending Cup champions.
With about 2 1/2 minutes to go, the Islanders dumped the puck in the Penguins' end. Carlyle went back to retrieve it. The puck bounced over Carlyle's stick. John Tonelli gathered it and fired in one motion.

3-3. 2:21 to go in the third.
The third period ended with the score tied -- in both Montreal and on Long Island. Both games were headed for overtime. In each case the home team had stormed back from a two-goal deficit to tie things up.

Would Edmonton do the same?
What happened next remains a bit of a blur. The Penguins-Islanders game was on television in Madison. Overtime began.

It also began in Montreal. There it lasted only 22 seconds.
Quebec fails to convert on a 2-on-1 but wins when a falling Dale Hunter backhands the puck in the net. It takes a few moments for the referee to signal that it's a goal.

Meanwhile, on Long Island, the contest continues.

Anxiety. Desperation.

And Randy Carlyle. Again.
It all started when McEwen blocked a shot from Carlyle. He gets up and passes up ice to Tonelli, who's skating in his typical flailing windmill fashion.

Pittsburgh's Paul Baxter drags Tonelli down as the two enter the Penguins' zone. The puck slides to the end boards.
Penguins netminder Michel Dion, who has been magnificent in the series, decides not to play the puck and scrambles back to his crease. Tonelli gets to his feet, turns, and backhands the puck to Nystrom.

We've seen this magic before. May 24, 1980.
Once more Nystrom plays the puck to his backhand. It's almost there.

But Carlyle knocks Nystrom down from behind.

The puck is loose. So is Tonelli. The windmill winger backhands the puck over a fallen Nystrom ...

... and into the net.

4-3. 6:19 into OT. Bedlam.
Now, for most people, certainly for #Isles fans, the story ends here, with celebration mixed with relief. It's a wild moment in Uniondale. It's a wild moment in Madison.

At the same time, however, something else is happening to the west ...
... as word comes that the Kings have scored three unanswered goals in the second period at Edmonton, opening up a 6-2 lead.

Wow. The two teams most likely to dethrone the Islanders may be gone.

And they were. Final: Kings 7, Oilers 5.
Now I know this wasn't a great moment for @bigmouthsports ... although the Oilers, just like the Isles before them would suffer through playoff growing pains before winning it all. But this was quite a day in NHL history.
One former dynasty was now clearly going to have to work to reclaim its standing (and did in 1986, helped by another upset of the Oilers). Another was still on the way up. A third survived on its way to four Cups and 19 consecutive playoff series wins.
Think about it: between 1976 and 1988, these three teams claimed all the Stanley Cups won during that period. All of them.

And yet their fates were intertwined on that unforgettable April 13, 1982.

What a day ... my favorite non-SCF playoff memory.
Well, actually Los Angeles Kings 7, Edmonton Oilers 4. It was even worse than I remembered.
(Carlyle had won the award in 1980-81.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brooks D. Simpson

Brooks D. Simpson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrooksDSimpson

Apr 4
Sometimes it helps to step away from the immediacy of the moment to reflect on the situation in front of us.

In a sense both parties have lost faith in the democratic process. American politics as we know it faces a pivotal moment.
Under the guise of "election irregularities" (and worse) Republicans are doing all they can to make it more difficult to vote and to create mechanisms to defy popular majorities (including gerrymandering and notions of state legislatures determining how to cast electoral votes).
In the past Democrats were not above such practices (see the Jim Crow South), but today it seems that they hope that legal proceedings and convictions will prevent a certain someone from running for the presidency again.
Read 17 tweets
Mar 5
I see where some folks don't like the demographics concerning support for the Confederacy (which has to be truly measured both quantitatively and qualitatively).

But let's look at some numbers in rough form.
Let's accept for the moment the US census of 1860 in terms of "free" and "slave" while noting the fact that some free southerners were black.

Of the original seven Confederate states:

2,656,789 free, 2,312,352 enslaved.
Now, we now there was unionist support in Louisiana and northern Alabama, and secession was a close-run issue in Georgia. But let's take the 10% unionist guesstimate offered by another poster.

Assuming that enslaved people did not support the CSA ...
Read 12 tweets
Oct 14, 2022
Let a Confederate heritage apologist speak for himself ... er, speak as cosplay Jeff Davis (liked by "General"): Image
This is hilarious.

First, note the cosplay cowardice by both poster and endorser. Davis and Lee would be ashamed to be represented by such cowards.

Second, they aren't interested in American history.
They are interested in presenting a version of history with which they are comfortable while charging those with whom they disagree as being "activists" and "anti-American."

Really?

I guess it's better than advancing an interpretation of their own.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 14, 2022
Here's an example where Costas prefers to draw attention to himself, although subtly.

He remarks that catchers as batters don't want to challenge the home plate ump on questionable ball and strike calls so that they can get those calls when they are behind the plate.
That may be a useful observation for the casual fan, less so for more involved fans.

But he's sitting right next to a pitcher--Ron Darling, a smart guy.

Why not ask him about a pitcher's perspective on how his catcher should act? Let Darling be the insider.
Color analysts are best when they tell me something I might not know or notice. They are value-added.

It was an opportunity lost, even if the point is a fine one.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 14, 2022
What's remarkable about Confederate "heritage" apologists and defenders is how their endeavor has proven to be just as counterproductive as the Confederacy itself. It destroyed what it sought to protect.
Fifteen years ago, there was no groundswell of support for the removal of Confederate iconography or monuments, just a few scattered episodes of resistance.

Remember this? library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/docu…
But all of a sudden there were groups like League of the South and the Virginia Flaggers, who tended to make fools of themselves with boycotts, protests, and erecting flagpoles.

They attracted white supremacists and were attracted to them. They were kindred spirits.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 13, 2022
If you want to compare the 2022 midterms to previous midterm contests, look for the same power dynamics: a party holding the presidency and both houses of Congress looking to maintain that situation versus a determined opposition.

Think 2010 and 1994. Or 1874.
In all three cases the opposition got control of at least one chamber (1874, 2010) or both (1994). That result effectively crippled the president's party from passing legislation, though Clinton enjoyed some success. Grant and Obama did not.
You could also point to 2018, but while Democrats retook the House, Republicans actually strengthened their hold on the Senate. That dynamic could repeat, swapping party identities (Dems with presidency and Senate, Republicans in House).
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(