They're coming for our T-cells next.
Adding ORFab1 to the mix. What could possibly go wrong ...
@a_nineties @my2pups2 @Clucky92864053 @Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaks @PlanZip @villagerssn @KathMLee1 @janiesaysyay cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
we maintain same high b2 related AB levels despite b4.
- this clearly points to immune fixation
- original antigenic sin
"Notably, N and M specific responses were reduced in the group receiving both BNT162b2 and BNT162b4 compared to the group receiving BNT162b4 alone"
- this points to impairment on N,M ABs from B2 version.
- as the b4 contains some M and N protein expression ABs are expected
However, how many humans are left over on this planet willing to take b4 which have not had b2 earlier?
Also, again this points to strong OAS!
If you had S specific b2 = less N or M specific ABs.
If you had S + N+M b4 = dominated response with S + N + M ...
upon your next infection/injection this S+N+M dominated response will take over spreading OAS issues now from S onto other proteins.
visual aid wrt all the ORF and NSP
ht @my2pups2
@GUstaoset @a_nineties @my2pups2 @Clucky92864053 @Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaks @PlanZip @villagerssn @KathMLee1 @janiesaysyay however ...
to get stuff to work in the mice, it is likely an overshoot on one end and damages us more than the mice and on the other end may fall flat on its face when confronted with our resistant construction.
I believe most infection is oral/gastrointestinal.
I'd keep it at partially.
Let's have a look at NSP1-4
@Kevin_McKernan @Clucky92864053 @KathMLee1 @PlanZip @GUstaoset @a_nineties @my2pups2 @Jikkyleaks @villagerssn @janiesaysyay I was honestly expecting your contamination research to show also the mRNA to be shoddy due to all the codon optimization, quick hack job and m1Ψ all over it.
Just for the OCD: it is of course ORF1ab, not ORFab1. Noticed the typo just now.
@threadreaderapp unroll please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Soo many things wrong … 1) fragmented RNA 2) late polyadenation = polyadenation of the fragments making them viable = we have no idea what could be created 3) truncated RNA of spike could easily make S w/o NTD
…
H/t @Kevin_McKernan for all the work and write-up!
4)combined with 2) this means cells can produce unanchored S or S without intended 2p mod = free floating, cleavable S 5) down same road: if only S1 is encoded in faulty RNA = free floating S1 6) m1Ψ prevents degradation of this faulty RNA so can keep on spreading or in exosomes
7) remember S encodes for some human(like) proteins. Now have truncated RNA for those polyadenated and picked up by ribosome. Now you have fragmented cells with your own protein expressed but recognized as foreign due to other parts. = immune system now reacts on self
Or
Just in case you forgot:
Perlman, Baker, Baric, Drosten, Fouchier
MERS, closely related to bat-Covs
Could unlikely spill from bat to human, so lets assume an intermediary host species ...
sounds all too familiar, doesn't it? journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.11…
Pfew! Luckily all of the events noted are either same a "background signal"(even if never encountered before)! So control 6%, bnt 12% = meaningless because in range. Nice if this was for only 1 occurrence. However, if your entire paper is littered with it: pdata0916.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/pdocs/110122/1…
Again, background to the rescue! Also, complaining about the number being too low wrt to sample size means your sample size sucks! Underpowered trial. But again, just a coincidence the numbers are worse in the bnt part. Just sheer bad luck! (and of course: background).
On first glance, this looks like a promising situation: take a bunch of lab animals, dose 1, dose 2 and dose 3, then bivalent WIV1/B4/5 booster = lots of "neutralizing antibody titers" Yay!!! /1 biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Now let's have a look into what actually is going on: 1) They start out with BALB/c mice (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BALB/c), which in a matter of minutes turn into hamsters. I assume in Taiwan a mice= a hamster, so I'll leave it at that. /2
Will come back to the mica later on as they kinda have a telomere issue ongoing. 2) so they inject the mice with all the doses (my mistake only 2 doses + b) and the booster split in groups of 5 to test regimen /3
With the immunosuppressive/-compromising effects of 💉3/4/5 increasing, expect a breakdown of the epi-/endemicity of regular viral and bacterial infections. This will result in rolling waves of common illness recurring every few weeks/months non stop. /1
As large swaths of the population have their immune reactions compromised, clearing and keeping at bay all kind of infections will diminish resulting in an environment where you are surrounded by constantly infectious people. /2
Going to work, to club, public places and public transport will constantly expose you to high viral and bacterial loads of all kinds. Hence you will experience for example regular bouts of upset stomach, diarrhoea, coughs, sneezes /3