Read on Twitter
1/6🧵
Absolutely breathtaking (new review):
In reliable human experiments face #masks lead to 1.41–3.2% carbon dioxide breathing, exceeding both NIOSH limits for CO2 respiration:
-acute limit for 15 min: 3% CO2
-chronic limit for 8 h:: 0.5% CO2
cell.com/heliyon/fullte…
Absolutely breathtaking (new review):
In reliable human experiments face #masks lead to 1.41–3.2% carbon dioxide breathing, exceeding both NIOSH limits for CO2 respiration:
-acute limit for 15 min: 3% CO2
-chronic limit for 8 h:: 0.5% CO2
cell.com/heliyon/fullte…
2/6🧵
Regarding CO2, circumstantial evidence exists that mask use may be related to current observations of a significant rise of 28% to 33% in stillbirths worldwide and a reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance in scores in children born during the pandemic
Regarding CO2, circumstantial evidence exists that mask use may be related to current observations of a significant rise of 28% to 33% in stillbirths worldwide and a reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance in scores in children born during the pandemic
3/6 🧵
A significant increase in CO2 body levels in mask wearers under various conditions has been demonstrated by many scientific intervention studies
A significant increase in CO2 body levels in mask wearers under various conditions has been demonstrated by many scientific intervention studies
4/6 🧵
According to these data, wearing face masks has the potential to exceed acute (3% CO2 for 15 min) and chronic (0.5% CO2 for 8 h) NIOSH limits for CO2 respiration.
This causes toxicological risks of carbon dioxide rebreathing for particularly vulnerable groups.
According to these data, wearing face masks has the potential to exceed acute (3% CO2 for 15 min) and chronic (0.5% CO2 for 8 h) NIOSH limits for CO2 respiration.
This causes toxicological risks of carbon dioxide rebreathing for particularly vulnerable groups.
5/6 🧵
Animal experimental data shows deleterious proven effects of elevated CO2 of inhaled air with threshold values of above 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.8% (Neuron destruction, impaired memory and learning, increased anxiety, destruction of cells in testes, stillbirth, and birth defects).
Animal experimental data shows deleterious proven effects of elevated CO2 of inhaled air with threshold values of above 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.8% (Neuron destruction, impaired memory and learning, increased anxiety, destruction of cells in testes, stillbirth, and birth defects).
5/6 🧵
in view of the limited scientific evidence for masks as an effective pandemic measure (SARS-CoV-2), there is need to re-evaluate and reconsider mask mandates especially for vulnerable subgroups (pregnant, children and adolescents)
in view of the limited scientific evidence for masks as an effective pandemic measure (SARS-CoV-2), there is need to re-evaluate and reconsider mask mandates especially for vulnerable subgroups (pregnant, children and adolescents)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
