Rose milk cake and Chikmagaluru cold coffee in Irish and orange flavours.
Verdict: Good food, but modest portions, hence may not exactly be VFM. Some sides served with the main dish are interesting, like the green chilli in mustard sauce server with the butter chicken. A restaurant where you can taste a variety of cuisines under a roof
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
12 January 2025 marks the centenary of the Bawla murder case. This killing of one of #Bombay's richest men on Malabar Hill attracted global attention and led to the abdication of the Maharaja of a princely state:
On 12 January 1925, Abdul Kader Bawla, a rich businessman and corporator in the Bombay Municipal Corporation, was murdered while on a drive at Malabar Hill in Mumbai and an attempt was made to kidnap his companion Mumtaz Begum. However, Mumtaz was saved by the fortuitous arrival of four officers from the British Army. In a scene straight out of a Bollywood flick, these unarmed and outnumbered men fought off the eight assailants and saved Mumtaz from their clutches.
More significantly, they managed to capture one of the murderers. Eventually, the case, which had captured media and public attention, led to the abdication of Maharaja Tukojirao Holkar-III of Indore.
But this is not just another true crime. The case and its backstory involves personalities of the day like Dr B.R Ambedkar, Chhatrapati Shahu of Kolhapur, M.A Jinnah, 'Prabhodhankar' Keshav Sitaram Thackeray, the father of later-day Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and his elder brother Ganesh aka Babarao, and the Shankaracharya. Mumtaz later went to Hollywood to try her luck in the film industry. A silent movie on the Bawla case was also produced in Bollywood in 1925 itself.
Read on to know more about this crime and its intersection with the various social and political realities of colonial India.
Of course, you can also buy my book 'The Bawla Murder Case: Love, Lust and Crime in Colonial India' at (amzn.eu/d/79k8tPK) or from an indie book store like @Bahrisons_books @KitabKhanaBooks @faqirchandbooks or @bookworm_Kris
Abdul Kader Bawla (25), was a businessman and corporator in the Bombay Municipal Corporation from Mandvi in south Mumbai. He was a landlord and textile-mill owner, and was considered one of the richest men in Bombay. He belonged to the mercantile Kutchi Memon community and was the grandson of philanthropist Haji Saboo Siddik. On 12 January 1925 evening, Bawla went on a drive with his mistress Mumtaz Begum. They were accompanied by his personal assistant, driver, and cleaner.
Near the Hanging Gardens on Malabar Hill, a Red Maxwell car rear-ended Bawla’s Studebaker. It blocked Bawla’s car and around seven to eight people alighted from the Red Maxwell, abused Bawla and demanded that he hand over Mumtaz. They fired at Bawla from the left, where Mumtaz was sitting. Another assailant seized Mumtaz, when she broke out of her shocked daze and screamed.
Lieutenant John MacLean Saegert, an officer in the British Army’s Engineers, Sappers and Miners, and his friends, Colonel C.E. Vickery, and lieutenants Francis Batley and Maxwell Stephen had played golf at the Willingdon Sports Club near Mahalaxmi Race Course.
At around 7.30 p.m., they left the club to visit the Taj Mahal Hotel at Apollo Bunder. On their way to the hotel, Saegert, who was driving and was unfamiliar with the area, arrived at Kemps Corner and took a wrong turn, driving up Malabar Hill via Gibbs Road instead of taking the lower Hughes Road to their intended destination.
When they reached the top of the Malabar hill, they saw two other cars on the right side of the road. When they were around thirty yards away, the European officers saw some men get down from the car in the front, followed by flashes of a pistol and then loud screams from the second car.
On hearing the screams, Saegert stopped the car. The officers, who were unarmed and in civilian clothes, got out and rushed towards them. Three men were threatening a woman with knives. The woman, who was Mumtaz, had already been injured on the forehead and was being dragged out of the car
Despite being unarmed and outnumbered, the Army men put up a fight straight out of a Bollywood flick. Saegert was shot at and stabbed by the assailants multiple times as he tried to fight them off. Lieutenant Batley attacked the shooters with a golf club, which was the only weapon available to the officers in the melee. Batley was also fired at by an assailant, but escaped unhurt. The army men overpowered an assailant, who was armed with a pistol and jack-knife and was grappling with Saegert. As residents of the neighbourhood appeared on the scene, the other attackers fled.
Bawla succumbed to his injuries at the J.J. Hospital. Bawla had a fortune of Rs 40 lakh. He willed it to his widowed mother Rukhiabai in his dying declaration, leaving Mumtaz Rs 1 lakh, which was a princely sum in those days.
The crime sent ripples across the country as Bawla was one of the leading public men of the day. The Bawla murder case was also mentioned in the British Parliament. The European officers were lauded for their bravery.
Just a day after the attempted abduction of Mumtaz Begum and murder of Abdul Kadar Bawla, the Bombay City Police had realized this was not just another street crime or holdup. Patrick Kelly (later Sir), commissioner of police, Bombay wrote to the secretary, Government of Bombay, Home Department, about evidence pointing to a conspiracy being hatched or instigated in one of India’s most prominent princely states.
Kelly, who was one of Bombay’s longest-serving police commissioners, said the girl Mumtaz ‘was in the keeping of the Maharaja of Indore for a few years’. Mumtaz had left the royal in April 1924, and had been ‘kept’ by Bawla
Kelly said that the inspector general of police, Indore, sent his assistant to him around two months ago, with a request for copies of certain statements recorded by the Bombay police in an enquiry once made by them regarding Mumtaz. The commissioner added that he had refused to supply the copies and that any demand for papers of this sort should be made by the political agent of Indore to the Government of Bombay
A short while ago, Mumtaz’s sister had written to her from Amritsar that the Indore authorities were collecting wrestlers to abduct her to Indore. Bawla himself was said to have received threatening letters.
Investigations revealed that Shafi Ahmed Nabi Ahmed, who had been nabbed by the European army officers at Malabar Hill, was a risaldar in the Indore Mounted Police. Initially, he had denied his guilt and claimed to be an innocent pedestrian proceeding on his way when he was caught in the fray.
But the most daunting challenge for the Bombay police team was that although the crime had taken place in British Indian territory, the conspiracy was hatched in Indore. However, the investigators overcame this hurdle by their dexterity. Despite the odds stacked against them, the investigation by the Bombay police unearthed that most of the suspects on their radar were senior officials of the Indore durbar
Eventually, they arrested Pushpasheel Balwantrao Ponde (twenty-three), a Mankari or court dignitary from Indore; Captain Shamrao Rewaji Dighe (twenty-eight) from the Indore State Air Force; Akbarshah Mahomedshah (twenty-three), huzrya (valet) in the household department, Indore; Mumtaz Mahomed Syed Mahomed (twenty-five), sub-inspector, CID, Indore; Karamatkhan Nizamatkhan (twenty-eight), pay sergeant, Holkar mounted escort, Indore; Abdul Latif Moyuddin (twenty-five), motor driver, Indore; and Bahadurshah Mahomedshah (twenty), motor driver, Indore. It was believed that they were involved in the shooting. Later, Major General Sardar ‘Dilerjang’ Anandrao Gangaram Phanse, aged thirty-two, the adjutant-general of the Indore State Forces was also arrested. The Bawla murder case is considered to be a landmark investigation in the history of the #MumbaiPolice.
Mumtaz was born in 1903 in a family of Punjabi Muslim courtesans. Her grandmother Karimbibi was said to be in the harem of Maharaja Ranjitsinh of Punjab. In 1911-12, Mumtaz’s mother Wazir Begum took her to Indore and the mother-daughter duo performed for the rich and famous in the town. Soon, they came in touch with Shankarrao Gawde, the major domo of Maharaja Tukojirao-III. Soon, Mumtaz became the Maharaja’s mistress. Mumtaz was famed for her beauty. As the author K.L. Gauba says "In her own class, it was said, Mumtaz was without a peer."
In April 1919, Mumtaz and her mother travelled with the Holkar family to Bombay. Tukojirao-III is said to have offered to marry Mumtaz by having her convert to Hinduism. However, this offer was rebuffed. The next day, Mumtaz was taken away from her mother on the pretext of watching a movie and was sent to Indore instead without her mother’s knowledge or consent.
Wazir Begum lodged a complaint about her daughter’s abduction with the Bombay Police, but the case was eventually dropped as there was no documentary evidence about Mumtaz being a minor. Mumtaz stayed on in Indore with a status equal to the two Maharanis and was also known as Kamalabai. In 1924, a girl was born to Mumtaz in Indore. The nurses claimed that the child had died later. Mumtaz alleged that the child had been killed by the nurses.
Finally, Mumtaz, her mother and step-father Mahomed Ali fled the custody of the officials of the Indore durbar as they were heading to Mussorie from Bhanpura. They finally arrived in Bombay where those linked to the Indore durbar are said to have made an attempt to restore her to the princely state. Mumtaz however had a fortuitous escape. She began performing again in Bombay. It was then that she came in touch with Bawla and became his mistress. After a tiff with her parents, Mumtaz moved in with Bawla and began staying with his family at their sea-facing residence near the Girgaum Chowpatty. Mumtaz was finally putting the turbulence of the past behind her and settling down with Bawla when the shots rang out on that fateful day on Malabar Hill.
The newspapers and periodicals of the day reported extensively on the crime. Some publications even promised their readers "exclusive photographs" of Mumtaz. The issue was raised in the British House of Commons.
In court Phanse was represented by Barrister Muhammed Ali Jinnah. Jinnah’s wife Ruttie would sit through the trial daily. During the trial, Mumtaz claimed that the real accused in the case were not being tried in court.
Eventually, Justice L.C. Crump sentenced three men—Shafi Ahmed, Captain Shamrao Dighe, and Pushpasheel Ponde, to death. Two of the nine accused were acquitted. Phanse was sentenced to transportation for life.
As a semi-sovereign ruler, Tukojirao could not be tried in a court of law like a commoner. However, the circumstances in the case went dangerously close to implicating him. These included Mumtaz’s testimony, her allegation about her child being murdered and the accused in the case being in the service of the Indore durbar, with some holding high offices. The trying judge had noted that ‘there must have been some kind of conspiracy,’ and that there were persons behind the assailants ‘whom we cannot precisely indicate’
Eventually, Ponde, who was aged around 22-23, went insane in jail and his death sentence was commuted to imprisonment for life. Shafi Ahmed and Dighe were finally executed at the Dongri Jail in Bombay on the morning of 19 November 1925. Intense secrecy had been maintained around this as people would gather near the jail gates after rumours of the impending execution.
Patrick Kelly’s efforts to crack the case which had turned into the ‘talk of the country,’ had led to pressure being brought upon him from the powers that be. Indore was among the foremost princely states in India and officers of the Crown in India were not keen on disrupting the status quo. These officials feared that any action by the Bombay Police against Indore would affect the relationship of the British empire with the princely states. Kelly was an upright officer and refused to succumb to these temptations and demands. He realized that these pressures were hampering the investigations into the case and threatened to resign from his position if it continued. His warning to the Bombay Presidency government worked and the pressure on the police eased. Such was the moral fibre of police officers in those days!
At a time when there were no scientific or forensic tools available, the Bombay police cracked the Bawla murder case based on circumstantial and material evidence, and human intelligence. As investigations went, this was a masterpiece. The Bawla murder case is regarded as a landmark case in the history of the Mumbai Police.
Gradually, pressure was mounted on Tukojirao-III to step down as the ruler of Indore. However, two social reformers, 'Maharshi' Vitthal Ramji Shinde and 'Prabodhankar' Keshav Sitaram Thackeray stood by him. Prabodhankar, the father of later-day Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray, wrote three books in Marathi and English on the Bawla murder case. Prabodhankar was a leading light of the non-Brahmin movement in Maharashtra and reasoned that since the Holkar’s were non-Brahmins (they belonged to the Dhangar community who are originally pastoralists), the largely Brahmin-dominated press was gunning for Tukojirao. Copies of Prabodhankar’s book ‘The Temptress’ were also distributed in the British Parliament!
Eventually, Tukojirao was given the choice of either abdicating or facing a Commission of inquiry. He eventually abdicated in 1926 and was replaced on the throne by his son Yeshwantrao-II Holkar. Incidentally, Tukojirao’s father Shivajirao too had been forced to abdicate by the British.
Mumtaz was later estranged from her family. In 1929, she launched her career as a stage singer and eventually left for Hollywood to try her luck there. Not much is known about what happened to her later. Interestingly, a silent film on her life and the Bawla episode named Kulin Kanta (1925) was produced in Bollywood.
Generations of #Maharashtrian parents and grandparents have lovingly called their naughty children and grandchildren ‘dambis’ or ‘dambrat.’ But do you know that these were originally cuss words used by British officers and overseers for Indian labourers in the #Mumbai docks?
This is how the docks have had a deep cultural impact on Mumbai and #Maharashtra. Of course, these docks also catalysed industrial and economic development, and helped export goods like salt, opium, and cotton from India.
This is a thread on Bhau Laxman Ajinkya aka Bhau Rasul, who laid the foundations of #Mumbai’s port-led maritime growth by building the city’s first wet dock—the Ferry Wharf or Bhau cha Dhakka in 1841. Read on to know how the words ‘dambis’ and ‘dambrat’ entered the popular lexicon.
Laxman Harishchandra Ajinkya was born in 1788 in a Pathare Prabhu family at Karanja in present-day #Raigad district. His father Harishchandra migrated to Mumbai in 1801, but passed away soon after. The 12-year Laxman was faced with the daunting task of looking after his mother and two young siblings. But, Laxman had learnt English and had excellent handwriting. In those days when there were no computers or typewriters, such people were much sought after for their skills.
Laxman joined the East India Company’s Gun Carriage Factory at Dhakta Colaba, where armaments like cannons, guns, and cannonballs were manufactured. He soon rose to be the head clerk for Captain Russel, a high-ranking officer in the establishment, who trusted him implicitly. Laxman spoke up for the interests and welfare of the workers. For instance, the workers had to navigate swampy areas to reach the factory and found it tough to carry their lunch boxes. Laxman successfully requested Captain Russel to set up a canteen in the factory. This may have endeared him to his fellow workers and earned him the moniker of Bhau or brother.
Russel nudged Bhau Laxman to get into business. He resigned from service and took up contracts like the one to build roads by reclaiming swamps and marshes to connect the island that made up what was then #Bombay. Laxman reclaimed the land from Chinch Bunder to Masjid Bunder and Crawford Market at his own expense. He also developed villages like Akurli, Dindoshi, and Chinchawali as suburbs. The proximity to Captain Russel may have earned Bhau Laxman the nickname ‘Bhau Rasool.’
Bhau Laxman also bagged tenders to construct wharfs or bunders. Then, Bombay did not have a regular wharf or pier for passengers or goods traffic. He built the first wet dock at the eastern end of what is now Indira Dock. This was called the Ferry Wharf and was opened for public use in 1841. This construction took four years and involved strenuous efforts on part of Bhau—he had to develop it from his own funds and for this, had to borrow a princely sum of Rs 1.50 lakh at a compound interest of 6 per cent. He repaid the loan in eight years. The British allowed him to use the docks on a 50-year contract. Bhau Laxman mortgaged his land to build another wharf, this time with warehouses for storing goods—making it the only one in British India at that time. This gave a boost to the export and import of goods.
Though the ferry wharf was named after him, the name ‘Bhaucha Dhakka’ embedded itself in popular lingo. He also constructed the Claire and Carnac bunders which cost Rs 8 to 9 lakh, and were named after Governor John Fitzgibbon, the Earl of Clare and Governor Sir James Rivett Carnac, in whose tenures they were built. These three wharves were the first in Mumbai.
Gradually, more docks and wharves were built. The Sassoon Docks were built in 1875 on reclaimed land by David Sassoon and Company owned by Albert Abdullah David Sassoon. Developments like Bori Bunder (1852), Elphinstone Docks (1858), Princess Docks (1880), Victoria Docks (1888) and Alexandra Docks (1914) followed. After the remodelling of the Alexendra Dock, the original Ferry Wharf was moved to its present location adjacent to Princess Dock in 1969.
The docks helped export of goods like opium to China and cotton to Britain. The cotton trade led to the crop being planted in areas like Vidarbha, thus leading to a deep economic and social impact on Maharashtra. The Mumbai port, coupled with the Railways, engineering industry and textile mills, led to Mumbai being gradually developing into a metropolis.
However, while the textile mills have turned into a swanky business district, the land housing engineering industries in the eastern suburbs has made way for housing and commercial projects. The Mumbai Port, which once provided employment in blue and white collar jobs and led to the emergence of legendary trade unionists like Placid D’Mello (P.D’Mello), too has seen a gradual decline in its fortunes with traffic gradually shifting to JNPT and Gujarat.
Bhau Laxman Ajinkya passed away on 19 October 1858, but his legacy lives on. Even today, Bhaucha Dhakka or Ferry Wharf is used by fishing boats and trawlers and by passengers who take the ferry boats or RoRo services to Mandwa, Uran, JNPT, and Revas.
Murder most foul, as in the best it is. But this most foul, strange and unnatural. –William Shakespeare, Hamlet
On 12 January 1925, Abdul Kader Bawla, a businessman and corporator in the Bombay Municipal Corporation, was murdered while on a drive at Malabar Hill in Mumbai and an attempt was made to kidnap his companion Mumtaz Begum. However, Mumtaz was saved by the fortuitous arrival of four officers from the British Army, who despite being unarmed and outnumbered, fought off the eight assailants and saved Mumtaz. More significantly, they managed to capture one of the murders. Eventually, the case, which had captured media and public attention, led to the abdication of Maharaja Tukojirao Holkar-III of Indore.
But this is not just another true crime. The case and its backstory involves personalities of the day like Dr B.R Ambedkar, Chhatrapati Shahu of Kolhapur, M.A Jinnah, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and his elder brother Ganesh aka Babarao, and the Shankaracharya. Mumtaz later went to Hollywood to try her luck in the film industry. A silent movie on the Bawla case was also produced in Bollywood.
Read on to know more about this crime and its intersection with the various social and political realities of colonial India.
Of course, you can also buy my book 'The Bawla Murder Case: Love, Lust and Crime in Colonial India' at () or from an indie book store.
On 12 January 1925, twenty-five year old Abdul Kader Bawla, a businessman and corporator in the Bombay Municipal Corporation from Mandvi in south Mumbai. Bawla was a landlord and textile-mill owner, and was considered one of the richest men in Bombay. He belonged to the mercantile Kutchi Memon community and was the grandson of philanthropist Haji Saboo Siddik.
Near the Hanging Gardens on Malabar Hill, a Red Maxwell car hit Bawla’s Studebaker on the rear. It blocked Bawla’s car and around seven to eight people alighted from the Red Maxwell, showered abuse on Bawla and demanded that he hand over Mumtaz. They fired at Bawla from the left, where Mumtaz was sitting. Another assailant seized Mumtaz and she screamed.amzn.eu/d/79k8tPK
Lieutenant John MacLean Saegert, an officer in the British Army’s Engineers, Sappers and Miners, and his friends, Colonel C.E. Vickery, and lieutenants Francis Batley and Maxwell Stephen had played golf at the Willingdon Sports Club near Mahalaxmi Race Course.
At around 7.30 p.m., they left the club to visit the Taj Mahal Hotel at Apollo Bunder. On their way to the hotel, Saegert, who was driving and was unfamiliar with the area, arrived at Kemps Corner and took a wrong turn, driving up Malabar Hill via Gibbs Road instead of taking the lower Hughes Road to their intended destination.
When they reached the top of the Malabar hill, they saw two other cars on the right side of the road. When they were around thirty yards away, the European officers saw some men get down from the car in the front, followed by flashes of a pistol and then loud screams from the second car.
On hearing the screams, Saegert stopped the car. The officers, who were unarmed and in civilian clothes, got out and ran towards them. Three men were threatening a woman with knives. The woman, who was Mumtaz, had already been injured on the forehead and was being dragged out of the car
Despite being unarmed and outnumbered, the Army men put up a fight straight out of a Bollywood flick. Saegert was shot at and stabbed by the assailants multiple times. Lieutenant Batley attacked the shooters with a golf club, which was the only weapon available to the officers in the melee. Batley was also fired at by an assailant, but escaped unhurt. The army men overpowered an assailant, who was armed with a pistol and jackknife and was grappling with Saegert. As residents of the neighbourhood appeared on the scene, the other attackers fled.
Bawla succumbed to his injuries at the J.J. Hospital. Bawla had a fortune of Rs 40 lakh. He willed it to his widowed mother Rukhiabai in his dying declaration, leaving Mumtaz Rs 1 lakh, which was a princely sum in those days.
The crime sent ripples across the country as Bawla was one of the leading public men of the day. The Bawla murder case was also mentioned in the British Parliament. The European officers were lauded for their bravery.
Just one day after the attempted abduction of Mumtaz Begum and murder of Abdul Kadar Bawla, the police had realized this was not just another street crime or holdup. Patrick Kelly (later Sir), commissioner of police, Bombay wrote to the secretary, Government of Bombay, Home Department, about evidence pointing to a conspiracy being hatched or instigated in one of India’s most prominent princely states.
Kelly, who was one of Bombay’s longest-serving police commissioners, said the girl Mumtaz ‘was in the keeping of the Maharaja of Indore for a few years’. Mumtaz had left the royal in April 1924, and had been ‘kept’ by Bawla
Kelly said that the inspector general of police, Indore, sent his assistant to him around two months ago, with a request for copies of certain statements recorded by the Bombay police in an enquiry once made by them regarding Mumtaz. The commissioner added that he had refused to supply the copies and that any demand for papers of this sort should be made by the political agent of Indore to the Government of Bombay
A short while ago, Mumtaz’s sister had written to her from Amritsar that the Indore authorities were collecting wrestlers to abduct her to Indore. Bawla himself was said to have received threatening letters.
Investigations revealed that Shafi Ahmed Nabi Ahmed, who had been nabbed by the European army officers at Malabar Hill, was a risaldar in the Indore Mounted Police. Initially, he had denied his guilt and claimed to be an innocent pedestrian proceeding on his way when he was caught in the fray.
But the most daunting challenge for the Bombay police team was that although the crime had taken place in British Indian territory, the conspiracy was hatched in Indore. However, the investigators overcame this hurdle by their dexterity. Despite the odds stacked against them, the investigation by the Bombay police unearthed that most of the suspects on their radar were senior officials of the Indore durbar
Eventually, they arrested Pushpasheel Balwantrao Ponde (twenty-three), a Mankari from Indore; Captain Shamrao Rewaji Dighe (twenty-eight) from the Indore State Air Force; Akbarshah Mahomedshah (twenty-three), huzrya (valet) in the household department, Indore; Mumtaz Mahomed Syed Mahomed (twenty-five), sub-inspector, CID, Indore; Karamatkhan Nizamatkhan (twenty-eight), pay sergeant, Holkar mounted escort, Indore; Abdul Latif Moyuddin (twentyfive), motor driver, Indore; and Bahadurshah Mahomedshah (twenty), motor driver, Indore. It was believed that they were involved in the shooting. Later, Major General Sardar ‘Dilerjang’ Anandrao Gangaram Phanse, aged thirty-two, the adjutant-general of the Indore State Forces was also arrested.
Mumtaz was born in 1903 in a family of Punjabi Muslim courtesans. Her grandmother Karimbibi was said to be in the harem of Maharaja Ranjitsinh of Punjab. In 1911-12, Mumtaz’s mother Wazir Begum took her to Indore and the mother-daughter duo performed for the rich and famous in the town. Soon, they came in touch with Shankarrao Gawde, the major domo of Maharaja Tukojirao-
III. Soon, Mumtaz became the Maharaja’s mistress.
In April 1919, Mumtaz and her mother travelled with the Holkar family to Bombay. Tukojirao-III is said to have offered to marry Mumtaz by having her convert to Hinduism. However, this offer was rebuffed. The next day, Mumtaz was taken away from her mother on the pretext of watching a movie and was sent to Indore instead without her mother’s knowledge or consent.
Wazir Begum lodged a complaint about her daughter’s abduction with the Bombay Police, but the case was eventually dropped as there was no documentary evidence about Mumtaz being a minor. Mumtaz stayed on in Indore with a status equal to the two Maharanis and was also known as Kamalabai. In 1924, a girl was born to Mumtaz in Indore. The nurses claimed that the child had died later. Mumtaz alleged that the child had been killed by the nurses.
Finally, Mumtaz, her mother and step-father Mahomed Ali fled the custody of the officials of the Indore durbar as they were heading to Mussorie from Bhanpura. They arrived in Bombay and Mumtaz began performing again. It was then that she came in touch with Bawla and became his mistress. After a tiff with her parents, Mumtaz moved in with Bawla and began staying with his family at their sea-facing residence near the Girgaum Chowpatty. Mumtaz was finally putting the turbulence of the past behind her and settling down with Bawla when the shots rang out on that fateful day on Malabar Hill.
In court Phanse was represented by Barrister Muhammed Ali Jinnah. Jinnah’s wife Ruttie would sit at through the trial daily. During the trial, Mumtaz claimed that the real accused in the case were not being tried in court.
Eventually, Justice L.C. Crump sentenced three men—Shafi Ahmed, Captaon Shamrao Dighe, and Pushpasheel Ponde, to death. Two of the nine accused were acquitted. Phanse was sentenced to transportation for life.
As a semi-sovereign ruler, Tukojirao could not be tried in a court of law like a commoner. However, the circumstances in the case went dangerously close to implicating him. These included Mumtaz’s testimony, her allegation about her child being murdered and the accused in the case being in the service of the Indore durbar, with some holding high offices. The trying judge had noted that ‘there must have been some kind of conspiracy,’ and that there were persons behind the assailants ‘whom we cannot precisely indicate’
Eventually, Ponde, who was aged around 22-23, went insane in jail and his death sentence was commuted to imprisonment for life. Shafi Ahmed and Dighe were finally hung at the Dongri Jail in Bombay on the morning of 19 November 1925. Intense secrecy had been maintained around this as people would gather near the jail gates after rumours of the impending execution.
Patrick Kelly’s efforts to crack the case which had turned into the ‘talk of the country,’ had led to pressure being brought upon him from the powers that be. Indore was among the foremost princely states in India and officers of the Crown in India were not keen on disrupting the status quo. These officials feared that any action by the Bombay Police against Indore would affect the relationship of the British empire with the princely states. Kelly was an upright officer and refused to succumb to these temptations and demands. He realized that these pressures were hampering the investigations into the case and threatened to resign from his position if it continued. His warning to the Bombay Presidency government worked and the pressure on the police eased. Such was the moral fibre of police officers in those days!
At a time when there were no scientific or forensic tools available, the Bombay police cracked the Bawla murder case based on circumstantial and material evidence, and human intelligence. As investigations went, this was a masterpiece. The Bawla murder case is regarded as a landmark case in the history of the Mumbai Police.
Gradually, pressure was mounted on Tukojirao-III to step down as the ruler of Indore. However, two social reformers, Maharshi Vitthal Ramji Shinde and Prabodhankar Keshav Sitaram Thackeray stood by him. Prabodhankar, the father of later-day Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray, wrote three books in Marathi and English on the Bawla murder case. Prabodhankar reasoned that since the Holkar’s were non-Brahmins (they belonged to the Dhangar community who are originally pastoralists), the largely Brahmin-dominated press was gunning for Tukojirao. Copies of Prabodhankar’s book ‘The Temptress’ were also distributed in the British Parliament.
Eventually, Tukojirao was given the choice of either abdicating or facing a Commission of inquiry. He eventually abdicated in 1926 and was replaced on the throne by his son Yeshwantrao-II Holkar. Incidentally, Tukojirao’s father Shivajirao too had been forced to abdicate by the British.
Mumtaz was later estranged from her family. In 1929, she launched her career as a stage singer and eventually left for Hollywood to try her luck there. Not much is known about what happened to her later. Interestingly, a silent film on her life and the Bawla episode named Kulin Kanta (1925) was produced in Bollywood.
No frills joint located bang outside the Grant Road (West) railway station. Good place for coastal food
Moti Mahal Restaurant, Dariyaganj, New Delhi
The place where butter chicken is said to have originated. The butter chicken you get here is different from the 'tandoori chicken shreds served in oily gravy' stuff that is served elsewhere. Try the brain curry and kababs too...
Must visit
After eating at Moti Mahal, top it up with desserts from Cool Point Shahi Tukda across the road. Try the shahi tukda and kheer
The outrage over the refusal of a Gujarati-dominated housing society to allow a #Maharashtrian woman to rent an apartment/ office at Mulund in #Mumbai is not the first such instance of housing apartheid directed at #Marathi speakers in their own capital. The roots of this discrimination run deep in #history.
Some political activists got together and ensured that the father-son duo in the Mulund society apologised to the woman. But soon, it will be back to business for them. At least, until the next outrage…
Even today, there is no clarity over whether that silly "rule" which was cited as the basis for the denial has been rolled back.
One must note that while the liberal intelligentsia is quick on its feet to denounce any expression of nativist, pro-Marathi sentiment in Mumbai, they often ignore similar regional and linguistic chauvinism, sub-nationalism and xenophobia in their own states. They also fail to acknowledge that opportunities are often secured through networks linked to caste, linguistic and regional identities with merit per se taking a back seat.
#Mumbai was a part of #Maharashtra in the geographical, historical, and socio-cultural sense. #Marathi speaking groups like the Agaris, Kolis, Bhandaris, Pathare Prabhus, Pachkalashis etc populated the clutch of islands that make today's Mumbai. These indigenous residents had to eventually pay the highest price for Mumbai's 'development.'
Marathi merchant princes and entrepreneurs like Rama Kamat Lotlikar and Jagannath 'Nana' Shankarseth Murkute, and the middle and labour class have built Mumbai brick by brick over the centuries and so have people like Nagu Sayachi and Raosaheb Papanna, who spoke Telugu but were culturally Maharashtrians. Economic migrants from other states came here later because they saw opportunities here and because they felt Mumbai was the mythical El Dorado, the city of gold.
Anyone denying this reality are living under a rock, or perhaps, they are THE rock.
The Samyukta Maharashtra movement had to fight tooth and nail to ensure that Mumbai was retained as part of Maharashtra and was not hived out as a union territory or merged with Gujarat as big money and capitalists wanted it to. The point to be noted is that the leaders and foot-soldiers of Samyukta Maharashtra also included the Telugu-speaking working class and journalists and activists like Va. Ra. Kothari, a Jain, who were Maharashtrians by conviction and belief. Maharashtra secured Mumbai on 1 May 1960 after the martyrdom of 106 people. Those who wanted to usurp Mumbai by hook or crook have certainly not forgotten this "slight!"
Mumbai had a strong working-class movement. This was broken down after mill owners, politicians, bureaucrats, builders, and the underworld colluded to sell off lands on which the textile mills stood. This was a barbaric case of dispossession. The mills were syncretic spaces and supported a strong manufacturing ecosystem. This was broken down. The communal strife in Mumbai during the 1990s owes much to this. The same story repeated itself when it came to the engineering units.
Malabar Hill is the most prestigious & well-guarded neighbourhood in Mumbai. It houses ministers, bureaucrats & the elite. The Raj Bhavan is also located here. In the 1970s, there was a robbery in Raj Bhavan, that too from the Governor's bedroom! #thread #MumbaiPolice #history
Nawab Ali Yavar Jung was the Governor of Maharashtra from 1970-76. Then, the Governor used to stay in Pune during the monsoons.
When Ali Yavar Jung returned to Mumbai from Pune, he was shocked to find that his cupboard in his bedroom in the Raj Bhavan had been raided. His suits, shervanis and clothes had been stolen. His Padma award medal had also been stolen.