Thread by @ncdave4life

@JKSteinberger 1/11」 Prof. Julia Steinberger, do you believe that because you trust everything AR6 says? I was a WG1 Expert Reviewer, and I tell you that's a BIG mistake.

E.g., have you heard about AR6's new TCRE (Transient Climate Response to cumulative carbon-dioxide Emissions) concept?

@JKSteinberger 2/11」You can read about TCRE in AR6 WG1 5.5, TS.3.2.1, 1.6.3, etc. It's a completely nonsensical concept, based on the premise that, not merely does CO2 still in the air have a warming effect, but that the mere MEMORY by Gaia, of CO2 which WAS ONCE in the air, ALSO does!

@JKSteinberger 3/11」I'm not joking. I wish I were.

In fact, the definition of TCRE presumes CO2 which was once in the atmosphere, but has been REMOVED by natural negative feedbacks like "greening" and dissolution into the oceans, still has JUST AS MUCH warming effect as the CO2 which remains.

@JKSteinberger 4/11」I hope it is obvious to you how completely ridiculous and unscientific that is.

https://twitter.com/ncdave4life/status/1432810945017962505

@JKSteinberger 5/11」ANY 2 things which have increased for 170 years (in this case temperatures and summed CO2 emissions) are obviously correlated. AR6 claims (with "high confidence") that means one causes the other — even though there's no physical mechanism by which it COULD cause the other.

@JKSteinberger 6/11」It is as ridiculous as blaming bedsheet strangulation on cheese consumption (which, famously, are highly correlated — google it).

So don't be deceived into thinking AR6 is a scientific document. It's just an industry marketing tool.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html

@JKSteinberger 7/11」The best scientific evidence shows rising CO2 levels are highly beneficial, for both mankind & natural ecosystems.

Who says so? Thousands peer-reviewed studies, conducted over more than a century.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…

@JKSteinberger 8/11」The benefits of more CO2 are real, measureed, and very large. The supposed major harms are all merely hypothetical. None of them have actually happened to a significant extent.
sealevel.info/negative_socia…

@JKSteinberger 9/11」Do you understand how totally unscientific & utterly ridiculous "TCRE" is?

Then why would you believe ANYTHING else from the climate industry's AR6 marketing literature??

https://twitter.com/ncdave4life/status/1644087965302284294

@JKSteinberger 10/11」“'One dollar can save a life' [so] the opposite must also be true. 'Poverty is a death sentence.' … Today's decisions should be based on all the information we can get, not on hiding the decline.”

I assume you recognize that quote. (You SHOULD!)

@JKSteinberger 11/11」So please stop repeating propaganda from the parasitic climate industry. CO2 emissions are no "threat." Compelling scientific evidence shows they're BENEFICIAL for both human well-being and natural ecosystems.

@threadreaderapp @rattibha @threaddotblue unroll