A thread explaining the design process starts from here:
Before you proceed, if you have read through the map, compared to the existing KL transit map, do you find the map to be improved, much more cluttered, or did not change your experience viewing the map compared to before?
If you think otherwise, do comment!
First, a preface -
I wanted to produce a map that adheres with these principles:
- accurate at publication and easily understood
- makes minimal changes to the existing map
- minimise the introduction of new elements to fulfil the first principle
Hence, the map doesn’t: 1. Show the names and service patterns of all LRT replacement buses, as that adds clutter and bus services can change 2. Change the structure of the map - while the current map isn’t well designed, changing the form was not the focus - only changing errors
With that out of the way, let’s discuss some of the major challenges I had editing the map, starting with the first one: how should non-active and special lines be shown on the map?
Precedence dictates that dashed lines means ‘not active’ but that took a paragraph to explain
@JugCerovic’s then method of illustrating planned and upcoming lines by fading them struck me as a good idea - it can be easily understood to be a line that isn’t active
This is very much seen in the space of UX, where a faded button nowadays represent a “disabled” state
There was a phase where I struggled the choice between illustrating the ‘faded’ idea or just got rid of the lines that didn’t exist entirely (eg LRT3)
But this will break principle 2, and will disrupt the perception of the map to existing viewers, so the first option was chosen
Now we have addressed how LRT3, KTM Skypark and Bandaraya-Sentul Timur should be shown, how should the masjid jamek-hang tuah be depicted?
I experimented with making the line a dashed line to illustrate a ‘special service’ with various lengths
Eventually, I settled on a length I liked (its 7pt), and started experimenting the colours of the dashes.
I initially chose yellow to represent ‘warning’ but that had poor contrast with AGL, then switched to black, but that had poor contrast with SPL. Changing to white works tho
A bit of feedback and the dashed line was later changed to be a dashed line enclosed in the colour line itself
This made it a bit more visible while viewed from a distance, while also distancing from the existing precedence of using dashes to denote ‘under construction’
To wrap up, we have now created two new lines that requires the modification of the map legend to explain the functions of the lines.
Here, you can also see KTM Skypark line is now marked as ‘suspended’, reflecting its current status since February
The legend includes the illustration of a grey line and a faded line, which looks confusing when looked together as they are both in similar shades of grey
They say old is gold and the previous way of showing connecting stations is indeed gold than a grey, squiggly line
Moving on: how do we communicate about the service disruption between masjid jamek & sentul timur?
Since I chose not to illustrate the shuttle bus routes, showing which stations where one can board the shuttle bus serves best
This is what was similarly done in London before
As its established that yellow would be the theme of ‘warning’ (the difference with MRT2’s yellow is that the ‘warning; yellow is more luminescent), next part is to determine the colour of the bus icon
Pure white or blacks didn’t look good but the 75% black looks a bit nicer
Since we want to establish a higher order of service hierarchy given the importance of the information, the size of the icons are 25% larger than the existing icons
To determine the distance between the icons and the station text names, I had to measure them and this is very annoying - it seems that no one icon has the same spacing distance from the next one!
the widths varied from 0.77 to 0.81mm, so I settled on 0.75mm as a safe choice
There are some instances where the icons could not be there as it is affecting the space of the text of other stations, so it had to be stacked vertically.
Interestingly, most station icons are spaced approximately 0.83mm vertically, so I went with that
The next undertaking is to provide the context for Ampang/Sri Petaling Line’s dysfunction.
For this, an infobox was created to allow for commuters to easily understand:
- the line affected
- the stations affected
- when will it be fixed
- alternative transportation provided
The infobox is divided into two parts:
- context
- solution
Most people may know the context but want to know or confirm the solution, and providing an easy way to show this is key
A contrasting design works best as it creates a ‘separation’ of idea while being themed, example:
Since there is nothing from the document itself I can extract to illustrate ‘fixing, I just created a spanner icon
it was an easy creation, didn’t think hard and just created it under 2 minutes
Contemplated to add the ‘download PULSE’ stock message as part of the infobox that would add to clutter, so that would need to be foregone.
In the meantime, here is an image of how close it could’ve been integrated into the infobox:
An interesting design question: as stations that are not active are faded, should Sultan Ismail, a station with no train nor shuttle bus service, be shown faded as well?
It can be argued for that it is a connection to Medan Tungku, but really no one is walking for 10mins for it
Also, this map is riddled with design inconsistencies - like, why are the numbers not centred against the circles they’re in?
It gets better when you realise that even the circles arent even full circles…
A small design touch - add the date of publication of the map!
This practice has unfortunately been discontinued since the publication of the newer maps, as older maps contain the dates of when they are published
To sum it up - this was an impulsive, 7-hour session of me suffering with illustrator to show what that has been itching in my brain since February
The map is likely to be false for 6 months so RapidKL should update their maps to not trick their customers lowyat.net/2023/294675/am…
But tldr why KTM skypark is suspended: low ridership, northern commuter sector needed trains and suspension meant funds can now be used to provide free train rides for students and PWDs
While doing this will conform with the first principle (accurate information), this will be at the expense of the second (minimal change) and third (minimal introduction of new ideas) principle
Also, until ERL changes the names to reflect this (TBD July), the names stands as-is
MRT Corp has released a mini site detailing featuring details about the alignment, station plans and other details that are also available at the physical inspection sites
A decent thread briefly analysing what I’ve seen:
If it matters, here’s the link to the website if you’re interested to do any digging by yourself:
There’s a few major takeaways that I can immediately see, but the major one is that the Malaysian Circle Line takes much design and specification cues from Singapore, and it’s not just the similar shape in question
KTMB's anti-bike policy on its trains is (literally) hurting recreational cyclists who travel to the countryside on the same day the restriction was announced
Imagine being ejected in the middle of nowhere at 1am - that is what they faced
A thread on their journey:
Despite having the bikes packed up in bags and even booking extra spaces for it, they were given an ultimatum by KTMB staff: either travel while the bikes stayed at the station with aux. police with no insurance or be evicted
A very tough choice - the cyclists decided to leave
They cycled from Gemas to Kuala Pilah in the middle of the night with the plan to cycle to Seremban then take the commuter to Malacca and a bus to JB
But as they soon find out, all buses were sold out, so they cycled to Muar to be picked up by a private driver instead
For a small price starting bid at 50k USD, that is the value of 3 million Malaysians registered on PADU, starting with @rafiziramli’s profile page as a demo page of what’s to come
Just saw that there’s now a 55k bid placed and it’s going higher…
So after spending a weekend with these vehicles, a good question to ask is: are these trackless trams/autonomous rapid transit the future of transit and is the answer for our cities?
Short answer: absolutely NOT!
A short thread compiling my thoughts on the system:
Part of the “benefits” of using these vehicles is that they don’t need to use catenaries like traditional trams and instead use supercapacitor chargers to charge at stations or charge wirelessly
The latter is still a new tech that has not matured yet
Taking observations from what I’ve seen after sitting around Lembah Subang LRT’s bus station for almost 4 hours, here’s what I’ve found so far, a thread:
Most people want to go back home, but don’t know how
Messaging from RapidKL is poor - they’ve only done announcing that service between Lembah Subang-Damai has terminated in the trains and that’s about it
The rest of the messaging is done by auxiliary police officers
RapidKL staff is missing on the ground
Instead in their place are auxiliary police officers, who are not as qualified to answer transit-related queries compared to RapidKL staff
I had observed 0 RapidKL staff that had made themselves front and centre of attention to render help