CofCNatHistory Profile picture
Apr 17 5 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
How do you tell Pleistocene mammoth, mastodon, & gomphothere molars apart? All three occur in Pleistocene deposits in South Carolina and throughout the southeastern USA but are frequently confused with one another. Here's a #fossilexplainer comic from Dr. Boessenecker to help! Image
Mammoth (Mammuthus) teeth are perhaps the easiest to distinguish as they have many plates of enamel that are flattened from front to back - typically 15-30 plates or so; these plates are thin, perhaps 1 cm thick, and the enamel itself is also thin - usually about 2-3 mm.
American mastodon (Mammut) teeth are much lower and have 3-5 transverse sharp ridge-like cusps that wear down into diamond-shaped wear facets. The enamel is quite thick (4-10 cm), & looks fibrous in structure when broken.
Cuvier's gomphothere (Cuvieronius) look very similar to mastodon teeth, and generally has cusps that are low & transverse but are rounded at their tips & possess many additional finger-like cusps and lobes. As a result, the wear facets are curved and 'squiggly'.
The enamel is also quite thick, 4-10 mm.
Smaller teeth from further forward in the jaws - premolars - generally can be identified using these features, but have fewer cusps/plates in all three elephants.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CofCNatHistory

CofCNatHistory Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CofCNatHistory

Apr 16
Juvenile fossils can be challenging to identify and are frequently ignored - but our scientists relish such a challenge, and reported the first growth series ever for a toothed baleen whale! New specimens of Coronodon havensteini showcase skull changes through growth. Image
The two juvenile specimens shown here surprisingly have snouts and palates that are the same proportion as the adult - normally, the snout starts off shorter and lengthens during growth in cetaceans. This suggests that feeding behavior constrained its shape. Image
The earbones also become quite inflated during growth - the posterior process becomes longer and wider, and the body of the periotic and anterior process become markedly inflated! These might get recognized as different species if found isolated. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 19, 2021
#Juneteenth
Sharing a post we made last June.
How might racial injustice have anything to do with something as seemingly innocuous as paleontology? The study of fossils from the Charleston area began within 50 years of its founding as a plantation economy-based British colony. 🧵
Shortly after plantations were constructed, enslaved Africans began finding unusual items in the earth.
The first correctly identified vertebrate fossils from North America were dug up on the "Stono Plantation".
The plantation owners thought the teeth belonged to a giant that perished in Noah's flood; English botanist Mark Catesby, who was visiting, interviewed many of the enslaved Africans who had seen the teeth, & identified them as elephant teeth - which are very similar to mammoth 🦷
Read 13 tweets
Jun 3, 2020
What, if anything, does paleontology have to do with racial injustice? The 1st identified vertebrate fossils from North America, mammoth teeth - were identified as elephant teeth by enslaved Africans on the Stono Plantation in 1725. These fossils led to hypothesis of extinction. Image
Many other fossils were excavated by unnamed people, likely slaves, on plantations - like the original fossil of the archaeocete whale Dorudon serratus, found on the Mazyck Plantation in the 1840s. Image
Many early 19th century naturalists in Charleston were either slaveowners or benefited from vast fortunes of their slaveowning families - a privilege that afforded them the time to devote to scientific research, considered a leisurely activity for 'gentlemen' at the time.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(