Read on Twitter
1/4
Today I feel like throwing a some excitable comments in the room & getting the #miltwitter feedback.
Topic: Naval contested logistics is too important to leave just logisticians to solve.
Issue: Organizations focused on lethality solutions
Today I feel like throwing a some excitable comments in the room & getting the #miltwitter feedback.
Topic: Naval contested logistics is too important to leave just logisticians to solve.
Issue: Organizations focused on lethality solutions
<or maneuver options should be forced to wargame their distribution and sustainment requirements with their logisticians. You don't get to just play mobility & engagement at tactical edge w/o defining the logistical support requirements & enterprise consequences. 2/4
3/4
Proposal: The naval services need to conduct a 3 wargame series for DMO/EABO. Tactical logistics, solve OPLOG C2 (with Army Theater Sustainment and JLENT integration), & Strategic Logistics from transportation to organic & national industrial base requirements.
Proposal: The naval services need to conduct a 3 wargame series for DMO/EABO. Tactical logistics, solve OPLOG C2 (with Army Theater Sustainment and JLENT integration), & Strategic Logistics from transportation to organic & national industrial base requirements.
4/4 Question: How should each of those games be organized (sponsors), what questions should they answer, what is a good scenario at each level?
From @C_M_Dougherty & @CNASdc here's a series of options and issues to consider.
cnas.org/publications/r…
cnas.org/publications/r…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
