There have been a number of new contributions around ethics questions in RCTs or field research more broadly lately so doing a mini- 🧵on ethics papers that are useful for all of us to review #EconTwitter
@DaveEvansPhD has a brand-new paper in Journal of Development Effectiveness about ethics in RCTs, w/useful points for reflection in different stages (planning / conducting / publishing) tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
One recent paper from Asiedu @Monica_Lambon@deankarlan@chrisudry proposed a structured ethics appendix for social science papers as an opportunity to reflect on + refine key ethics norms
This includes (not limited to) researcher roles; potential harms; conflicts of interest; and both use and misuse of results pnas.org/doi/abs/10.107…
Adjacent though distinct (focusing on ethical reporting in field research, not necessarily RCTs) is this pre-print from @a_peterman@Alesscguedes@JohtChandan@amiyabhatia analyzing ethical reporting of research on violence against women/children during COVID-19 pandemic
Found generally low adherence to guidelines around transparently reporting ethics. medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
I'm partial to this paper from @avdeenkoalex@MatthiasStelter
that actually experiments w/different methods to enhance understanding of survey respondents in the consent process + finds that a more interactive dialogue seems to help papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
@jaylyall_red5 has an intriguing proposal (also interdisciplinary overlap here with political science) focusing particularly on research among vulnerable populations / in fragile settings: preregister ethical "red lines" in terms of assessing and managing harms and risks. . .
Lots to dig into! I am not sure how running RCTs is taught in grad school these days, if at all (wasn't covered much in my dev classes; I learned by doing), but a module on ethics in conducting field research + RCTs seems like a crucial component, + there's plenty of material
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting new articles in the JHR today! In Spain, intro of a universal child benefit led to a (small) ⬆️ in births, while its cancellation led to a (small) ⬇️; authors can identify separately effects on conceptions + abortions @LibertadGonLu jhr.uwpress.org/content/58/3/7…
In Brazil, onset of hurricane Catarina in 2004 associated w/adverse effects on fetal / infant outcomes (incl fetal deaths) only for children of mothers age 15-24, w/maternal stress a plausible channel @VHOliveiraS@ClimentQD jhr.uwpress.org/content/58/3/8…
No issue of JHR would be complete w/o a paper using crazy Scandinavian admin data, here it is from Norway showing multigenerational persistence in economic outcomes out to great-grandparents (beyond what is predicted by parental status) @modalsli jhr.uwpress.org/content/58/3/9…
One paper joint w/@lucia_hanmer Rubiano + Arango shows that gender inequalities among a Syrian refugee population amplifies poverty, w/female-headed households particularly vulnerable tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
here are 10 exciting articles from each journal #EconTwitter. Today REHO (note not articles I personally was the managing editor for); CER tomorrow
2/ link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Dave + Yang: Evidence that working in a more intensive occupation during pregnancy ⬆️ probability of adverse birth outcome
Recently passed a year of editing (well, slightly more at REHO) so wanted to share some #EconTwitter thoughts on what I've learned (take them with a grain of salt, as there are many more experienced editors out there!)
For authors: generally, cover letters can be extremely brief unless you are bringing something very specific to my attention. If the cover letter repeats what's in the intro, not necessary (I will look at the intro!)
For referees: please respond to requests (saying no is fine, a rapid no is better than a ghosting) Recs of other referees are a nice bonus. A short report that is on time or close to it is also very welcome (you don't have to wait until you have 2 whole pages written)
This week's cool young researcher is Fatima Aqeel at Colgate University who works on questions related to gender, intimate partner violence + women's employment #EconTwitter sites.google.com/view/fatima-aq…
One paper currently R&R at WBER analyzes a reform in Pakistan in which admissions' criteria at medical schools were equalized for men + women, leading to an ⬆️ in labor force participation by women medical graduates + graduates overall
As I wrapped up another slew of referee reports this week (no worries, I actually love refereeing + learn a lot from it!) I thought it might be fun to do a little 🧵on my most common comments as a referee (and now, as an editor) - mainly for empirical papers
1: I'm on page 5 of the intro; what is this paper about? Take pity on us, your referees are people too. You should specifically explain what THIS paper is about + is doing by page two, at latest.
2: Here are other papers, how is this one different? Highlight the existing lit (thoroughly) +specifically note what your paper adds. Lots of debate over whether or not to do "this paper is the 1st", but you don't have to claim you're the first to note your contribution.