When we were kids (and I don't think it's much different now) Holocaust education was non-existent. We knew the details from our parents and from grandparents (the few who had them) but it was all one big muddle. I knew my father had been in Auschwitz and contracted typhus later
but the stories he told were of stealing food, making a complaint to Mengele, reciting a gemore on the way to the gas chambers from which he was de-selected while others were making confessions and other heroics. We of course knew the 6 million number but the rest was a blur
A meshulach would turn up from Israel, Chacham Shalom they called him though he was an Ashkenazi, and it was said that he fought with Tito as a partisan, so I learned that some fought the nazis, though not how and where. As a teen I turned up in Israel in the '80s...
where the talk amongst the lads was of Mered Ghetto Warsaw and the tales of Isser Harel on capture of Eichmann. But not how the Warsaw Ghetto ties up with the Hungarian Jews and the different methods during different periods in various countries. And then we had the rebbe stories
The Satmarer and his beard, the Belzer and his clouds plus our school cook who jumped off a train promising if she survives she'll serve schoolkids and the many other legends. But what was missing was the magnitude of it all, not that it's comprehensible even now
'Six million flies off the tongue too easily and we had no geography or context. My father spoke of Munkatch Ghetto and we knew of ghettos in the middle ages so what exactly was different? We heard of Warsaw but not of Kovno or other ghettos while Babi Yar was a foreign word
But still we breathed the Holocaust in our blood because it was everywhere around us. The guy who it was said saw his parents being shot, the kitchen manager in yeshive who would only hand out yesterday's bread and when challenged would retort, 'In Auschwitz we had not even this'
The violent rebbes in cheder, the boy who retorted to an adult who slapped him, 'Hitler yemach shemo, because if not for Hitler you wouldn't have hit me, the parents who wouldn't talk to their children about their experiences, the adult conversations we couldn't follow,
the sobbing at Yizkor (which as an orphan myself I stayed inside), the list of murdered brothers and sisters in books and on walls, the peek in the intro to Minchas Yitzchok which was one of the only seforim on shul shelves to tell the story, and which is just one single story
But the full picture eluded us. I once interviewed an elderly man about his experience and an adult grandson who was present asked him if he ever saw Hitler. Instead we debated Hitler's webfeet and whether he took his socks off and whether you may even utter his name
The suffering was told but so were we told of the suffering at the destruction of the Beis Hamikdosh and when the cheder rebbe told the legend of Reb Amnon and Unesane Tokef a boy put his head down crying and couldn't be consoled. To us it was all one and the same
To us it wasn't about a modern society turned crazy and the convulsion of Europe and how and why, about demagogues blaming Jews for defeat and the collapse of Weimar, the trope of turning on minorities in times of trouble, but rather one long continuum of golus...
and preparation for the golden age of moshiach, which Rebbe foresaw what, which holy book portended of what is to come, whose blessing saved whom. If Esau hates Jacob what difference does it make who could be saved? If they won't get you one way they'll get you another.
Missing also was the emotional trauma which the survivors couldn't and wouldn't speak of because it was so raw and because the world wasn't ready to listen. And missing also was our own trauma of being raised by that generation of parents, family, teachers and shul members
These are difficult subjects with no simple or single answer. But when a few years ago I was chatting to a typical chasidisher lad who'd been to cheder and yeshive and who had just returned from a visit to Auschwitz and his verdict was "Overrated" I knew we have failed somewhere
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This case like no other tells you all you need to know about how Charedistan treats abuse while wrapped in its stinking fake pious cloak of kedushe. Rabbis, Rebbes, politicians, arsekonim as far apart as Oz and Israel were all complicit in trying to deny Leifer's victims justice
By ensuring Leifer took the first plane out when her abuse was uncovered, by raising funds to prevent her extradition, by settling her in another community, by threatening psychiatrists to certify her unfit to stand trial and by doing all they could to ensure she went scot free
It's no longer allegedly because she's been convicted but they'll measure the sleeves of the victims and compare it to Leifer's turban and shrug "well... they're not frum and she's from a heilige family" Because turban wearers are either victims who daren't open their mouths...
"more women get refusers" means little without knowing more, especially average refusal-period duration. However, even if your statistics are right it's still a gender issue. If get refusal is a prison, then men do time in an open prison compared to solitary confinement for women
Frum men without a partner are able to attend a social club, otherwise known as shul, 3 times daily. Women don't have that and are nebechs in a way men are not. Men have dozens of events from tsholent fress ups to receptions and simches that aren't available to women
A man also has that last resort of Heter Meah Rabbonim to galvanise support for and work towards which isn't available to women who don't have male social networks and barely get to talk directly to the male gatekeepers as often and in the same manner like men.
On the subject of agunot/chained women, the almost reflexive reaction in frum communities is "but haloche..." followed by an expression of powerlessness against the Torah position that only a man can divorce... 1/23
...which often quickly moves on to feminism with a knowing sneer and a healthy dose of whataboutism on the status of women and decadence in Western societies. So let's be clear that there is far more to it /2
Whether halacha can find a solution (I believe it can) is a separate discussion but besides that there's plain and simple communal apathy even at best and at worst a deep-seated disdain for what is seen as modernist/feminist campaigns both for divorce and empowerment of women /3
🧵EPIC epic win for Stamford Hill girls & parents - Years of scheming at Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls School finally hit the buffers as voluntary aided YHS ordered by the Schools Adjudicator to increase Published Admission Number (PAN) by TEN new places gov.uk/government/pub…
The significance of this decision cannot be overstated and so long that there aren't more than 80 applicants EVERY SINGLE APPLICANT will get in. While there have been 80 girls in the past this is generally not the case. 2/
For September 2022 there were 76 applicants and only 70 offers so 6 girls rejected. At least 1 girl had to go through the stress of an appeal which was successful. 2021 had 80 applicants for 65 places but only 72 offers and 8 girls rejected, some spending year out of school 3/
🧵Friday night popped into first shul I came across on Golders Green Rd Imrei Shofer for Kabolas Shabbos. Modern-ish non-chasidish shtiebel likes of which barely exist in Stamford Hill these days. The rov himself approached me after davening to ask if I have where to eat. ThankU!
Thankfully, I was at a Bar Mitzvah in lower basement of new R. Bassous shul where there was abundance of good food and fine wine. Must have dug down a mile as 2 floors underground and still v. high ceilings. Mixed feelings on shul from outside though stands out for size and looks
In architecture speak it's not very sympathetic to local surroundings but then walking around Golders Green streets and if any sympathy is aroused it's for the local taste, or, and again in architectural speak, the local 'vernacular' such as front balcony with no means of access
For some Stamford Hill think, read on: This guy, let's call him Boruch Yitzchok Grunfeld (apologies if you carry that name, it's not you), meets me and says he heard my droshe and fine, but "What do you have out of it?" He tried putting himself in my position and asked himself...
"What has Boruch Yitzchok Grunfeld got to do with Chaim Halpern? What difference can I make to this?" Now arguments take time plus it's far more difficult to persuade someone whose mode of thinking is on a totally different plane. I said, rather than answer let me challenge the q
I should say he's a decent guy, set up a local charity which he runs, isn't of the type who thinks that abuse allegations are too easily made up, that women make poor witnesses or that too much fuss is made of abuse (such people do exist) though he does still think Stamford Hill