Nukes do not exist in the way they have been described to us.
Look at this video with your adult eyes. Odd? These are miniatures used to fool you into being afraid.
They showed you these and made young children do drills in schools and hide under desks in manufactured fear.
This man Galen Winsor (1926-2008), a chemist and nuclear physicist went to the Hanford Nuclear Site where they housed 200,000 cubic meters of high-level radioactive waste, swam in the pools where the spent fuel rods were kept and drank a glass of water out of them each day. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
What’s going on here? Are we to believe that these huge Nukes we dropped on Hiroshima aren’t able to destroy concrete that close to the “zero point”? Does this guy look at all concerned about radiation? What happened to the 1000’s of years half life we were taught in school?
Here’s more pictures of the aftermath supposedly caused by a nuclear bomb. Does this look like this was caused by a “Nuke”? Is this the devastation we have been lead to believe these “world enders” would cause?
This is a video of Tokyo which was official a fired bombing. Do you see any difference?
How is this little shed still standing?
Days after these explosions there were businesses open outside the main area that were well inside the “radioactive” area yet there has not been a time since, when people haven’t thrived here with cancer rates lower than the US. How?
This is John Hersey The ONE man the U.S. gov chose to cover Hiroshima. ONE MAN. Once again, they always tell you. “He is considered one of the earliest practitioners of the so-called New Journalism in which storytelling techniques of fiction are adapted to non-fiction reportage.”
In case you were wondering what did cause that huge mushroom cloud. Here are photos of military personnel stacking large amounts of TNT at 2 locations and a shot of the 2 mushroom clouds combined to make one big one. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
These are the stacks of TNT at the Trinity test site. See the similarities?
The only difference is the people stacking them. How much do you trust your lying government?
There is SO much more too this that I can’t fit on Twitter if you are interested. Check out these 2 links to get started.
A lot of people hear the term “Flat Earth” and automatically think it’s crazy.
This happens for two reasons.
1. You have never truly looked into our model.
2. You have never truly looked into your model.
So instead of trying to prove Flat Earth to you, in this thread we will look at a few of the things you must believe, in order to believe in the heliocentric model.
Let’s start with tides…
This video explains mainstream science’s beliefs on what causes the tides.
In order to believe this model you also have to believe that the moon with its weaker gravity, over powers the earth’s gravity in order to pull the water away from earth.
Yes, it does sound silly doesn’t it.
You also have to believe that for some reason the moon’s gravity only works on salt water and ignores fresh water.
According to the heliocentric model, the earth spins at over 1,000 mph at the equator and, if it was actually a spinning ball, it would be moving slower as you got closer to the poles.
If this is true, how would a plane taking off from the equator and heading north, decrease the “sideways” momentum caused by the spinning atmosphere?
Then are we to also believe that once it passes the North Pole that it would then begin to increase its “sideways” velocity in the opposite direction?
Think this through using your common sense.
Now let’s talk about stars.
If you believe mainstream science, you must believe that stars are suns with millions of light years differences in their distances and immense difference in their size.
But you can see them with the naked eye and they all appear roughly the same size.
Not only that but you can zoom in on them with a camera.
Do you think you can zoom in on something multiples of light years away?
Take (1) Hasselblad on the moon strapped to the chest of an astroNOT.
Spend under 3hrs walking on the moon.
Take 1409 pictures changing film 20 times.
That’s 1409/3≈470
That’s almost 8 pictures every minute.
Don’t believe me? Follow along.
Meet the Hasselblad Data Camera (HDC) with Réseau plate, fitted with a Zeiss Biogon 60mm ƒ/5.6 lens. It was adapted for NASA to take 70 pictures per cartridge of film instead of the usual 12. Imagine how fun it was to change film cartridges in a “spacesuit”.
They took 1409 pictures in roughly 3 hours. 1408 usable. Take a look through your photos on your phone.
How many out of 1409 are clear, historical images.
Keep in mind you are looking at the screen while taking those not having it strapped to your chest with no view finder.
Pull the thread and see what unravels. 🧵Let’s break this down together. It’s 2 min of your life. I’ll try to keep it short for those with no attention span. Unless you’re scared then just keep trusting Google!
First take a 90 year old ACTOR and strap him into a rocket shaped like a penis.
Then move the penis rocket up and down moving it in a thrusting motion. Mocking anyone dumb enough to watch and believe it. (They’re laughing at you!)