1. Ali Alexander says he’s had private 1-on-1 conversations with Musk. 2. 90 days ago Musk reinstated Alexander’s feed. 3. Today Musk suspended that feed over allegations of pedophilic grooming. 4. Many MAGAs now say Alexander’s proclivities were well-known. 5. Did Elon know?
🤔
6. Musk says he’s obsessed with child protection on Twitter. 7. But he removed many of the protections Twitter had against material that endangers kids. 8. Alexander says he was intermittently in touch with Musk as Musk plotted a Twitter takeover that loosened child protections.
9. As Alexander and Musk were in touch and Alexander says he had a voice in how Musk approached his Twitter play—including, presumably, loosening child protections—it appears Alexander may have been engaged in pedophilic grooming. 10. Shouldn’t media ask about Alexander’s role?
11. If what Alexander says is true—he was giving Musk advice on how to think through his plan to change Twitter’s protocols—and if one of the changes was reducing child protections and Alexander was allegedly grooming kids as he gave his advice, shouldn’t Musk be asked about it?
12. Baked into these very basic, reasonable journalistic questions is this fact: Ali Alexander is threatening to expose bad things about powerful people as part of his retaliation for what he’s going through right now, and just as he made that threat Musk preemptively banned him.
13/ Twitter doesn’t have a preemptive banning protocol. Alexander is alleged to have used DMs to groom underage boys—not Twitter. So Elon, who’s friends/friendly with Ali Alexander, chose to preemptively ban Alexander from Twitter *just* as Alexander became potentially dangerous.
14/ So apart from the questions above, doesn’t Musk have to be asked *why* he preemptively banned a man for non-Twitter conduct when that man—an alleged pedophilic groomer—is a friend of his/friendly with him and was advising him as he thought through Twitter’s safety protocols?
15/ Does this whole situation not make it look like Elon Musk is trying to aggressively silence Ali Alexander here on Twitter before Alexander makes good on his threat to take powerful people down with him, given that we know Alexander and Musk have had private conversations?
16/ And what are we to make of the fact that Elon has previously been photographed with *another* alleged pedophilic groomer who, according to the right, everyone always knew was involved in that sort of conduct? Did Musk know about Ghislaine Maxwell? Did he know about Alexander?
19/ According to the NYT—which as we well know Musk recently bragged he took "special pleasure" in de-verifying on Twitter—Musk *lied* about his photo with Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming she "photo-bombed" him and he does not know her at all when in *fact* they were in conversation.
21/ More about alleged pedophilic groomer Ali Alexander saying he was in contact with Musk in 2022. thedailybeast.com/stop-the-steal…
22/ The two men who did a documentary on Alexander’s Stop the Steal and say they’re "good friends" with Alexander—indeed they were with him at the Capitol on January 6—did a podcast episode about Ali Alexander and Elon Musk. I’m listening to it now.
23/ Rink and Escandon—past subjects of PROOF reporting—spoke with Alexander about Musk in April 2022. Alexander was focused on how Musk might handle speech if he ultimately took Twitter over. So surely he raised that with Musk if he began speaking privately with him in late 2022?
24/ Elon Musk has questions to answer about Ali Alexander. He needs to talk about their private discussions and what role an alleged pedophilic groomer had in advising Musk on Twitter safety protocols (ironically, a *false* allegation Musk made about Twitter’s prior Safety head!)
25/ Musk’s sudden ban of Alexander looks like—irony again, given Musk’s rants about "virtue-signaling"—a ploy to virtue-signal his way out of answering questions about his personal or professional associations with Alexander. ("Oh, I can’t be entangled with Ali, I banned him!")
PS/ And if Elon Musk won’t answer questions about Ali Alexander, maybe major media should ask Ali Alexander about Elon Musk? I’m pretty sure you’d get a response from Alexander at this point. His hatred of Twitter after his *first* Twitter ban was white-hot and I bet it is again.
QUOTE/ Holy sh*t.
Ali Alexander, April 2022, on Elon Musk possibly taking over Twitter: "[If he does], we might convert the company [Twitter] [to far-right views]. Now I don’t know if that’s possible, but if you think about it, the one billionaire who could sabotage Twitter...
QUOTE2/ "...but then be a poster-boy for talent recruitment to build something better—that could only be Elon. He’s the only one who could come in and go to war with the staff."
Shortly after Ali began speaking to Elon privately—of *course* they discussed safety protocols/staff.
QUOTE3/ So we have Twitter violating its protocols to summarily ban an alleged pedophilic groomer who seems to have advised Twitter on its safety protocols—which protocols then *removed almost all protections for minors*—and anyone’s going to say Musk shouldn’t be asked about it?
QUOTE4/ In his April 2022 interview on Musk, Alexander says "A lot of people want to work for Elon" and says he’d like to see Musk hire "civil libertarians" who’ll change how Twitter handles speech. Recall—again—that soon after this Musk began having private chats with Alexander.
QUOTE5/ My mind is blown. Beginning at ~27 minutes into this podcast episode, Alexander outlines *exactly* what he wants Musk to do if he takes over Twitter... and all he says is *exactly* what Musk did.
Yes, *including* how to handle objectionable content. Even extreme content.
ADDENDUM/ In the podcast, Alexander is asked about how he'd advise Musk—which apparently he did, in some unknown capacity and to some unknown extent—if Musk were to buy Twitter outright, and Alexander's exceedingly detailed response is about 40 minutes. He has *thought* about it.
ADDENDUM2/ There seems to be no question that Ali Alexander knows both Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey and has spoken to both about how Twitter should be run. Alexander's April '22 rant about Twitter showed a near-expert level of knowledge of Twitter financials. mediamatters.org/ali-alexander/…
ADDENDUM3/ Based on what I've seen, a *starting* "theory of the case"—to be confirmed/denied by far more investigation—would be that alleged pedophilic groomer Ali Alexander did have some role in helping steer Musk toward safety (non-)protocols that advantage groomers on Twitter.
ADDENDUM4/ This'd help explain why Musk broke site protocol to summarily ban Alexander the moment Alexander was a) outed as an alleged pedophilic groomer, b) had nothing to lose as his reputation was destroyed and c) had just begun threatening to out public figures as miscreants.
ADDENDUM5/ What major media *cannot* do is what Musk clearly *wants*: report on the Alexander ban as having nothing to do with Musk and everything to do with Musk opposing grooming.
ADDENDUM8/ What Musk did in gutting all child safety tools and resources at Twitter is what Ali Alexander said (in April 2022) he would advise Musk to do shortly before he started—apparently—*offering that advice directly*: get out of the way of any content moderation whatsoever.
ADDENDUM9/ There is an absolutely huge story to be reported on here if—unlike what the NYT executive editor just said—someone in major media is willing to go "toe to toe" with Musk. He must be asked about his relationship with Ali Alexander and Alexander must be asked about Musk.
ADDENDUM10/ In an October 2022 podcast, Alexander made stunning claims:
* He was the first person to break the story of Musk becoming CEO of Twitter because he had special "sources"
* He says he was working as a "strategy consultant" when he got the intel callin.com/episode/ali-al…
ADDENDUM11/ In that October 2022 podcast, Alexander also says:
* He had knowledge of Musk's internal (non-publicized) thoughts on matters of grave importance
* He had foreknowledge of federal actions against Musk that presumably only Musk or Musk inner-circle denizens would have
ADDENDUM12/ A reader just sent a link to a story about Alexander discussing Nick Fuentes with Twitter's executive class as part of his *repeated private conversations* with Twitter brass. (Did Musk turn over evidence of such chats in #TheTwitterFiles? No.) mediamatters.org/ali-alexander/…
ADDENDUM13/ Remember that in addition to being a neo-Nazi who dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, Fuentes is now accused of knowing for a long time that Alexander was allegedly a pedophilic groomer. So Alexander talked about Fuentes with Twitter brass—did Musk speak with Fuentes too?
ADDENDUM14/ Alexander being pals with Jack isn't news. Their chats aren't news—though maybe the absence of evidence of them in #TheTwitterFiles is. What matters is Musk *likes* Jack. If Alexander advised Jack on Twitter, is it a stretch to think Musk sought the same relationship?
ADDENDUM15/ Want to know what Alexander's big idea for Elon was just before he began talking to him about Twitter? Per his April 2022 podcast interview...
...it was getting rid of all verified checkmarks and making people pay for them.
What Musk is doing *tomorrow* (Thursday).
ADDENDUM16/ So there's a possibility Musk violated Twitter policies to summarily ban Alexander 48 hours before Alexander's Spring '22 plan for Twitter was executed because Musk feared that the just-outed alleged pedophilic groomer would *publicly take credit for Thursday's move*.
ADDENDUM17/ Alexander implies his secret source for preknowledge of Musk making himself Twitter CEO was a "dissident in power" who "trusts him" and is willing to talk to him at risk of "additional scrutiny from the federal government" (he'd just said Musk faced federal scrutiny).
ADDENDUM18/ It's so creepy that Alexander was implying in October 2022 that he was in contact with Elon Musk as he said a "subscription model" was coming to Twitter—you know, the one Musk *just unveiled*—which would make him and other far-right-wingers millionaires. I mean Jesus.
ADDENDUM19/ You don't have to read much between the lines of the October 2022 69-min. Alexander rant I linked to above to hear him saying he's helping steer Twitter in the Musk era—a feature of which era is the end of child-safety protocols (as Alexander was allegedly grooming!).
CONCLUSION/ I’ll end with this: *another* bizarre story that involves Elon Musk, Andrew Tate—who’s charged with sex trafficking and Musk just interacted with online—Jeffrey Epstein, sudden bans directed by Musk, and pedophilia.
CONCLUSION2/ Sorry—I can't resist underscoring how bizarre, creepy and suspiciously opaque all this is.
Guess who introduced Jeffrey Epstein to Mark Zuckerberg?
Yep—Elon Musk. (I assume this was before he lied to the NYT about knowing Ghislaine Maxwell.) vanityfair.com/news/2019/07/j…
CROWDSOURCE REQUEST/ If anyone can find this InfoWars episode, let me know. Could probably do it myself but I have listened to hours of Ali Alexander talking and I just can't go on with it at the moment.
ALLEGED PEDOPHILIC GROOMER ALI ALEXANDER (in October 2022, as Elon was making decisions that had the effect of creating no-moderation policies for much child sexual exploitation content on Twitter): "I've got sources embedded in Twitter and in [and] around Elon."
BREAKING NEWS2/
ALEXANDER (Oct. 2022): "[I know] Elon himself has made [reversing bans of MAGA ToS violators] 1 of his top 3 priorities....I was asked [by Twitter or Musk], 'What do *you* think the process [should] look like for people like yourself coming back [to Twitter]'?"
BREAKING NEWS3/
ALEXANDER (October 2022): "Right now he [Elon Musk] is trying to set up something that encourages dialogue [between Twitter and MAGA ToS violators]."
Huh. Pretty sure major media should ask Elon about the "dialogue" he established with Alexander, Fuentes, et al.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I just saw an amazing thread from @jsrailton—I retweeted most of it—and honestly it makes me now feel even more strongly than I did before that paying Elon Musk for Twitter Blue is like paying off a cyberterrorist who is holding you, your family, and even your country for ransom.
People quite seriously could die because of this stunt Musk is pulling. I think @jsrailton effortlessly demonstrated that with his just-published thread.
I will say again that this wildly dangerous de-verification plot was first conceived in Spring 2022—on the day Musk made a large purchase of Twitter stock—by convicted felon, active insurrectionist, accused pedophilic groomer, and man-who-thinks-he-can-time-travel Ali Alexander.
(🚨) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Musk Seals His Civil Liability for Illegal Use of Name/Likeness By Confessing He’s Pushing Some Celebrities Onto Twitter Blue Against Their Will and Stated Desires—Making It Seem They Endorse His Product When They Don’t; Open Season on Suing Musk Begins
(🚨) Musk not only faces potential liability—even eight-figure liability—for using the name and likeness of some of the biggest celebrities in the world to sell a product they not only don’t endorse but have *explicitly* said they find repellant (words we know he saw) but also...
(🚨) ...he could now face eight-figure liability for the reputational harm done to some major celebrities who publicly promised their hundreds of millions of fans that they would not buy or use a given commercial product that Musk is making it *appear* they secretly chose to use.
(1 of 2) ROLLING STONE reports some celebrity accounts may be *wrongly* listed as Twitter Blue subscribers now so Musk can—through fraud—convince folks to pay for Twitter Blue, a serious charge if true. And precisely who is the leading culprit of pointing out celebrity feeds...
(2 of 2) ...that now seem to have (but may not actually have) a Twitter Blue subscription? Why, it’s the very Hitler-loving, far-right, overseas-dwelling troll who’s about to host Elon Musk at a Twitter Spaces event in a few hours. That seems *awfully* convenient, doesn’t it?
1/ RETRO subscribers have watched this ongoing series in the Digital Culture section of the publication get better and better—more and more accurate, more and more detailed, and more and more illuminating—with each edition.
We are now on Volume 9 and the series is tight as hell.
2/ The most recent addition to the series is a Selected News section that itemizes—and links to—a small number of the major-media reports that are informing changes in the ranking over time. RETRO subscribers have instant interconnected access to all prior editions of the series.
Today Musk kills Twitter’s verification protocol. Impersonation of public figures will run rampant. Only those willing to pay Musk for once-free features will get comments atop reply threads. Stay tuned for RETRO’s new Top 100 Twitter Alternatives ranking. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
(PS) The idea to kill the Twitter verification protocol was first publicly developed by the insurrectionist, Jack Dorsey friend, and alleged pedophilic groomer Ali Alexander—who has claimed to have the ability to time travel.
In late 2022, he and Musk began having private chats.
(PS2) After the January 6 coup attempt at the Capitol, insurrectionists like Ali Alexander decided that Twitter’s self-acknowledged far-right-biased algorithm wasn’t biased enough. With many of them banned from Twitter, they wanted Twitter killed entirely. google.com/amp/s/amp.theg…
Wow—who saw this coming? The capo of a movement weirdly obsessed with pedophilia and known for {checks notes} the adage “every accusation is a confession”? Maybe the FBI should’ve spent much more time on Alexander, as *every January 6 researcher* has said? thedailybeast.com/stop-the-steal…