2/ To estimate the embodied emissions associated with manufacture and refrigerant leakage I used a peer-reviewed paper which puts embodied emissions for a domestic heat pump at 1563 kg CO2e. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
3/ I then used 308g CO2 as a marginal carbon emission factor per kWh of electricity to work out the operational emissions of our heat pump per year. I calculated that my heat pump avoids 1,313 kg CO2e a year resulting in a carbon payback of <1.5 years.
4/ Since 2019 the grid has become cleaner. Marginal emissions are 248g CO2 / kWh and average emissions are 146g CO2 / kWh. Here's the latest Green Book guidance with the emission factors. gov.uk/government/pub…
5/ New guidance on embodied carbon has been provided by @CIBSE. Using those figures, for a heat pump with a capacity of 7kW we can assume embodied carbon of around 1,500 kg CO2e based on the CIBSE figures below (slightly >200 kg CO2e/kW capacity). cibsejournal.com/technical/embo…
6/ Now let's compare this to a typical gas boiler.
Embodied emissions of the boiler are ignored in my calculation of gas boiler emissions as we assume the gas boiler is already in place. What I'm interested in is how quickly a heat pump install will offset its embodied carbon.
8/ Per kWh of gas used the boiler emits 183g CO2 based on Green Book guidance. That is 2,209 kg CO2e / year. Let's assume the gas boiler runs for another 15 years resulting in total operational emissions of 33,134 kg CO2e.
9/ Compare that to a heat pump: Using marginal emission factors from Green Book guidance and SCoP of 3 total operational emissions over 2023-2037 are expected to be 6,153 kg CO2e. For average emission factors it is 3,242 kg CO2e.
10/ Let's add embodied carbon emissions. Using CIBSE figures it would bring heat pump emissions over 15 years up to 7,653 kg CO2e for marginal and 4,742 kg CO2e for average emission factors.
That's 77-86% of gas boiler emissions. After 13 months the embodied carbon is offset.
11/ Sceptics will say that perhaps the embodied emissions do not capture all emissions. So let's double the CIBSE figure I used for argument's sake. That still results in total emission savings of 72-81% of a heat pump compared to an existing gas boiler.
12/ Even when we assume 10x more embodied carbon in the heat pump it would still make sense to replace a new gas boiler resulting in savings of 36-45% over the next 15 years.
13/ Others will say that the emissions factor for gas is too low because it does not include upstream emissions. Applying 210 kg CO2e / kWh instead results in higher carbon savings of 80-87% of a heat pump compared to an existing gas boiler.
16/ Add on: Many people want to know about the running costs of heat pumps vs gas boilers. Energy prices change very frequently right now but here's a snapshot for the current energy price guarantee period.
17/ If we add in the capital cost and assume a 15 year lifetime you would need an SCoP of 3.4-3.7 to break even with a gas boiler depending of the efficiency.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New research from @UKERCHQ sheds some light on these questions and shows that there "are real prospects for reduced installed costs" of heat pumps.
🧵
1/ Observed costs vary widely from over €30,000 to just over €5000. Higher values typically refer to larger ground source hear pumps. Lower values typically refer to air source heat pumps for new build housing, or retrofit installs which avoid heating system upgrades.
2/ Most forecasts suggest that average total installed costs are expected to decline in the future: the trend lines below suggest cost reduction between 2020 and 2030 of approximately 9% for ASHPs and 6% for GSHPs.
Ab 2024 sollen in Deutschland neue Heizungen zu 65% mit Erneuerbaren Energien betrieben werden. Eine der möglichen Optionen ist es, Wasserstoff zu nutzen.
Wasserstoff wird für das Heizen jedoch kaum eine Rolle spielen wie ich in @focusonline erkläre.
1/ Die fossile Energieindustrie ist zu Recht besorgt darüber, was die Wärmewende in Gebäuden für ihr Geschäft bedeutet. Wasserstoff scheint der Industrie jedoch einen Rettungsring zu zuwerfen. gas.info/gebaeude
2/ In der Realität ist dies jedoch eine Mär, welche auf Wunschdenken basiert. Meine Analyse von mehr als 30 unabhängigen Studien zeigt, Heizen mit Wasserstoff deutlich teurer, weniger effizient & umweltschädlicher ist als bewährte Alternativen.
Mythos 1: „Wärmepumpen funktionieren nicht in kalten Klimazonen.“
Falsch. Die meisten Wärmepumpen sind in den kältesten Klimazonen zu finden. Mehr als die 50% aller Haushalte in Norwegen haben eine Wärmepumpe, wie unsere Studie in @NatureEnergyJnl zeigt. nature.com/articles/s4156…
Mythos 2: „Wärmepumpen funktionieren nicht, wenn es kalt ist.“
Größtenteils falsch. Selbst bei Temperaturen unter dem Gefrierpunkt arbeiten Wärmepumpen noch gut, wie Felddaten zeigen.
Did you know that in England more than 2x as many new homes get connected to the gas grid every year compared to the total number of heat pumps installed?
🧵
1/ In England in 2022 a total of 210,070 new dwellings were built.
1/ The research uses data from Smart Energy Research Lab (SERL) Observatory which contains data from over 13,000 homes with smart meter data from August 2018 to August 2022. It compares it to the predicted energy use from EPCs.
2/ All bands except A and B have statistically significantly lower metered PEUI than modelled, with the difference increasing as the EPC Energy Efficiency rating decreases to F and G. On average, F and G rated homes show a metered PEUI almost half that expected by the EPC model.