1. The real risk of #SARS Let'er R.I.P (Re-Infection Policy) is positive feedback on pathogens OTHER than SARS-CoV. Take #Mpox.
What is remarkable about this cluster in Taiwan, other than it not being in WHO statistics (Taiwan being no member state)? nidss.cdc.gov.tw/en/nndss/disea…
@RealCheckMarker 6. As soon as 90 days after #Mpox infection, reinfection is possible. Even vaccinated individuals can be infected. Thus, WHO's warning is vital: states should include Mpox testing, vaxx and treatment in other health services such as for HIV and other STIs.
9. Some references in no particular order. "Evolution, epidemiology, geographical distribution, and mutational landscape of newly emerging monkeypox virus" - the titles all sound the same lol link.springer.com/article/10.100…
"Proteins E3 and CrmB revealed potential disruption of stability due to certain mutations. We identified a large number of mutations within the new outbreak clade. We need to move fast with the genomic analysis of newly detected strains for better prevention & treatment methods."
Mpox now follows SARS-CoV-2 to become a global challenge to humans. Said @LaurentAFKaiser poetically, Les cas de #variole dite du singe signent l’expansion d’un cousin de la variole originale que l’homme avait mis 200 ans à éliminer.
11. Evolutionary dissection of monkeypox virus: Positive Darwinian selection drives the adaptation of virus-host interaction proteins pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36710983/
12. HIV, SARS-CoV, MPXV: viral nucleic acid editing, a cellular defense mechanism mediated through protein families apolipoprotein-B mRNA-editing complex (APOBEC), ties these three viruses together. I'm not qualified to explain this stuff. very relevant. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
13. For such questions @RolandBakerIII is a good follow, keeping a keen eye on Mpox's next moves.
14. Airborne. - Or, more precisely, you can't exclude it being airborne. Hence N95 for patients and healthcare workers. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
1. Relevant SARS-CoV-2 pharmacological questions: Is Enovid as post-exposure prophylaxis (PeP) contraindicated in pregnancy? Asking for a friend 🤯 and the internet
Do we live in a society of science illiterates and noticed only as everyone had to put the cards on the table early 2020? More precisely, we see that @GhoshAmitav's Unthinkable applies to SARS-CoV as well as to climate.
CoV-2 was widely circulating in Italy by September 2019 (!)
@GhoshAmitav 2. There is scientific debate what these findings mean if anything. Debate and implications are not reflected in public, politics, or even the wider scientific community. It's not our role to force such debate via twitter; our focus should be on solutions. academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…
3. For 1 Sep to 31 Dec 2019, Chang et al. 2023 found no SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in blood donors in Wuhan before Dec 2020, indicating no evidence of transmission of COVID-19 before December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Absence of e is no e of a, but still: academic.oup.com/proteincell/ar…
Could care less what happened at 30 seconds. How much CO2, $, materials, energy, but more important, management attention was withdrawn from solving real global problems - for this nonsense?
Building giant flying steel dicks is not the awesome performance you may think, tech bros. This is the shape of genuinely impressive problems you could work on solving, if you cared:
1. Sharing research on long-run sequelae in SARS-CoV-1 survivors
18 years post infection (there were no reinfections in Cov-1!), 14 HCW in Tianjin: "Multiomic characterisation of the long-term sequelae of SARS survivors: a clinical observational study" thelancet.com/journals/eclin…
2. Recovered SARS patients had a poor quality of life 12 years following recovery, susceptible to inflammation, tumors, glucose and lipid metabolic disorders.
For the 12-year study they recruited 25 SARS survivors; for the 18-years only 14, ironically due to COVID restrictions.
2. "Altered Lipid Metabolism in Recovered SARS Patients Twelve Years after Infection" - Many good studies barely anyone read, and we shared them as volunteers on twitter like raw meat at a vegetarians' annual congress. nature.com/articles/s4159…
Fantastic commentary. - It's been a running joke; by Jan 2020 we knew the virus likely walked into the Wuhan market on two legs before it walked out. The western obsession with this market is an ongoing scientific embarrassment.
@sciencecohen 2. I could add political scientist comments, if useful, but more important is the missing virological argument. @Harvard2H wrote the first peer-reviewed article alleging an origin in serial passage of SARS-CoV-2, explaining its peculiar genomic signature. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bi…
All who criticize Laura for linking an article: yes, right-wing outlets are literally the only backwater galaxies in the media universe talking about this! They ignore the virus over the vaccine.
If you don’t like it, start scientific policy analysis, to help us avoid the worst.
Thanks so much @LauraMiers. You (we all) shouldn’t need to do this 🙏
A few hundred scientific references, if you count studies quoted. (I share as much every day) - SARS-CoV-2 is fast becoming one of the best researched viruses, yet we’re still scratching the surface. The vaccines hold crucial scientific questions too.