“Simplemente Maria” was an extremely popular telenovela, about a woman who works her way up and eventually marries the father of her child.
When Maria & Esteban married in the 225th episode, 5,000 real people gathered to watch the wedding. Women cried.
THE POWER OF TELEVISION!
It’s hard to work out if TV affects popular attitudes or vice versa.
As a result, quants have shied away from investigating television
And if you read all quant research on cultural change, if you were to read quant research, you’d probably underestimates the impact of TV
Qualitative social scientists observe huge popular consumption and discussions of television,
But quantitative scholars barely the effect of TV
So I do think that the latter radically underestimate its power.
Pritchett would say the same about structural transformation. It’s much easier to calculate the impact of an RCT so randomisation became a popular way to demonstrate causality.
And this surge of publishing led to an inflated sense of its importance, relative to growth.
In “Simplemente Maria”, the maid learns to sew and then gains upward mobility as a designer in France.
This may have fuelled interest in sewing among house maids in Peru!
The Singer company gave the lead actress a gold sewing machine in gratitude for promoting their machine!
When the lead actress visited the countryside in Peru and other Latin American countries, young women kneeled and kissed the hem of her skirt - akin to idol worship
[just like fans going crazy over Miley Cyrus or Selena Gomez]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In El Pais (a telenovela), Miranda was molested & sexually harassed.
This turns her against men.
She is strong, out-spoken & fixes a flat tyre.
Venezuela’s disapproving audiences thought she might be gay, so the show’s writer added this dialogue to challenge public bias 👇
In real life, prejudice persists.
People are intolerant, they project bias, so non-conformists anticipate condemnation and remain quiet.
Communities can be caught in a negative feedback loop, in which no one wants to stick their neck out and risk backlash or condemnation.
But if no one ever sticks their neck out and openly expresses difference, then their family and friends never get a chance to learn from or empathise with difference.
They remain in their closed minded, homogenous communities.
Others may be privately sympathetic but stay quiet.
9 in 10 US Muslims say “I am proud to be an American”
The vast majority express life satisfaction and believe you can get ahead with hard work.
I’d be keen to see how job-creating growth & social mobility affect assimilation (eg vs Bradford in the UK). pewresearch.org/religion/2017/…
HALF of US Muslims have experienced religious discrimination.
Half also say they’ve received expressions of support because they are Muslim.
Why are Muslim women much more uncomfortable?
They’re more suspicious of surveillance, they feel the GOP is unfriendly, Trump makes them angry and worried, they see a lot of discrimination, and their more dissatisfied, less likely to feel they have a lot in common with Americans
Today I was asked why Hindu and Muslim female employment are similar in India, but 30 percentage points different in the UK
Prejudice, community threats and cultural tightening may help explain these different outcomes…
🧵
So first of all, we should expect radically higher rates of employment in the UK (versus South Asia), since there are more well-paid jobs, high costs of living, and greater public safety.
But how to explain the Muslim-Hindu gap?
Now, when a community feels under threat, they tend to close ranks, and tightly police their members.
They demand strict adherence to existing norms.
This has been demonstrated empirically by @MicheleJGelfand and many co-authors.
Egalitarianism is often maintained through “reverse dominance coalitions”, eg foragers laugh at men who try to consolidate wealth or power [Morris, 2015]
Unions also gain strength in numbers
But domestic patriarchy is different.
The wife is typically alone, without any allies.
Foragers [and all other social groups] have historically maintained community norms through ostracising and punishing deviants.
As Ian Morris details, this can including mockery or worse exclusion.
Observers quickly learn what behaviour is condemned and join the bullies.
But such ostracism is totally impossible within a nuclear family, where two are married and the only others are junior dependents (kids).
Without strength in numbers, it’s much harder to push back and decry unfairness.