Sanctions were supposed to deny Russia's ability to finance the war. But sanctions were delayed and it didn't happen. Now sanctions are finally starting to bite. At the end of 2022 liquid reserves were slightly above 1 month of import. More facts: 1/
Before the invasion, Russia's reserves were $634B. Sanctions immobilize about $313B. This leaves Russia with $146B in gold and about $107B in FX assets (largely yuan). 2/
Russia’s economy faces an extended period of stagnation. There was essentially 0 productivity growth post-2014; now it will turn negative due to sanctions and war. Russian economy will further suffer due to emigration and brain drain. 3/
Russia reports a record deficit of 2.4T rubles in 2023Q1 - 82% of the full-year budget target. December had a record single-month deficit of more than 4T rubles. Key drivers are revenue underperformance, notably oil and gas, and elevated expenditures due to the war. 4/
Oil and gas revenues for January-March are 45% below their level the last year. Russia is increasing its tax on oil. However, this is estimated to bring about 600B - not even close to cover Ts in lost revenues. 5/
EU embargoes on crude oil (Dec. 5, 2022) and oil products (Feb. 5, 2023) were delayed. But now together with Europe’s exit from Russian gas, over 50% pre-invasion exports are sanctioned. The sanction gaps are East Asian democracies as well as China, India, and Turkey. 6/
Russia was able to redirect crude oil to China, India, and Turkey. The exclusion of shipping services from the EU embargo allowed to keep Russian oil on the market. But Russia has had to accept heavy discounts. 7/
Sanctions succeeded in maintaining oil market stability while reducing Russian export earnings. Global oil prices have returned to pre-full-scale invasion levels. Russia’s inability to find alternative buyers for its gas decreased gas production. 8/
High prices and redirection to alternative buyers supported Russian exports. But total exports have weakened since 2022Q4 as energy prices moderated and additional sanctions took effect. In imports, Russia has not been able to replace EU and US trade. 9/
KSE Institute expects significant declines in oil and gas export volumes (-12.9%, -27.9%) as well as prices (-32.6%, -49.4%) in 2023. 10/
KSE Institute projects that lower export volumes and prices will cut oil and gas earnings in half this year (41% for oil, 64% for gas). The current account surplus will narrow to $63 billion. This is a problem because Russian budget assumes $123 billion surplus. 11/
Sanctions are working. Slowly but surely. Let's add more. You can read the entire KSE Institute sanction chartbook and suggestions for further sanctions here kse.ua/wp-content/upl…
Lavrov: everyone understands the US declared a crusade against Russia and its legitimate interests, choosing Kiev nazi regime as its tip and pumping it with weapons.
Everything here is a lie. 1/
Main argument: the US has declared a crusade against Russia, while Kyiv is a puppet of the US.
No, on February 24, 2022 Russia has invaded Ukraine with hundreds of thousands troops, from North, South, and East, launched missile attacks, sent tanks, bombed cities. 2/
The US has not done nor declared anything. It is Russia that started the war in Ukraine. Since then Russia killed and tortured tens of thousands of civilians, abducted and deported children, and committed war crimes and atrocities. 3/
These are @MichalMatlak and Polish Senator Kazimierz Ujazdowski. We met yesterday in Kyiv and talked politics. Not the grain from Ukraine, but governance, judicial reform, anti corruption.
Here are the four key principles how to do a judicial reform. 1/
These principles are invaluable to understand for Ukraine. But also for Poland. They also show where the EU gets the judicial reform (in Ukraine) wrong.
1. It is not about the process, but people and culture. 2/
You can change laws and procedures. You can create new institutions. You can bring in new people. But if you don’t change the culture of how these people interact and what principles they follow, there will be no meaningful reform. 3/
Poland has resumed transit of Ukrainian agriculture through its border. This is good news. But unanswered questions remain for everyone: the EU, Poland, and Ukraine. Here they are. The first one is very sensitive.
1. Why ban on Ukraine but not Russia? 1/
Russia also exports agricultural products to the countries that recently banned Ukrainian import. The volumes are smaller but non-zero. Does it mean that they are negligible?
The argument for the ban is that the prices are low and hurt local farmers. 2/
But as every economist would explain one could have banned Russian import and imposed quotas in Ukrainian import to achieve the same reduction in imports.
2. If the issue is damage to local farmers, then why ban what they don't produce? 3/
Kyiv at night. Beautiful and magical. With electricity ;))
We don’t take this beauty for granted anymore. Every person that lives, every building that stands - they have been protected by the armed forces of Ukraine and by the world gracious support. Thank you people!!! 1/
Blackouts feel like a thing of the past. There are still regular missile attacks, but in Kyiv the pauses between them have grown much longer and their severity has decreased. Some say Russians have given up. Others - they have run out of missiles. Perhaps, it is air defense. 2/
But there are worse things than blackouts and cold - water outages. Some of the first attacks in the fall left us without water for several days. No toilets. No much to drink. It was tough. So we still stockpile water. And likely to continue do it until the war is over. 3/
Ukraine is at war. Poland tries to get the funds from the EU for its farmers. So, it blocks import and transit from Ukraine. The EU offers funding to Poland and neighbors. That’s basically the story of the ban of Ukraine grains and it’s removal. Here are the facts. 1/
What happened. On March 20, the Eu commission offered 56 m Euros to support farmers in Poland and other countries banning Ukrainian grain imports. This was not enough. Today the EU offers 100 m and the countries can match subsidies to the farmers using their own funds. 2/
Do the countries have the right to unilaterally ban the imports from Ukraine? No. Here is DW: The EU has slammed Poland, Hungary and Slovakia for stopping imports of Ukrainian grain. The European Commission is stressing that it is in charge of trade policy in the bloc. 3/
Poland has blocked Ukrainian grain export and transit. Not any more. The First Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine Yulia Svyrydenko is in Poland and has just finished negotiations. The transit will be reopen on Thursday night. Good job! But what happened? 1/
Even before the recent ban on expert and transit of grain, Poland has been gradually tightening up restrictions. Here is my tweet of several months ago talking about week long lines on the border. Now we know what was up. Technically, there was not enough Polish personnel. 2/
What are the reasons for the ban? Political, really. But first a unilateral ban on export from Ukraine by a EU member state is a violation. It is a challenge to the unified approach to international trade policy by the block. 3/