A good # of the biggest federal ones have a grey badge.
But the lower you go into regional offices, state & local, the worse it looks.
And situation is even more dire internationally.
Rich villain sowing global chaos to make everyone give them $$$ is the evil-scheme-that-always-splutters in so many great movies.
Because the near universal audience reaction is to want it to fail.
Epically.
Given the scale of official accounts around the world stripped of verification today.
And those of elected & appointed officials.
And counting twitter's slashed global workforce.
It's safe to say that this totally avoidable chaos will be with us for a long time.
Ugh, the State Department's tipline, too.
Which offers rewards for tips about terror groups targeting the USA.
The stakes are not a joke.
Presidential administrations got stripped of verification too.
So did whole govs.
I picked Africa, and it was true for just about every country I checked.
Twitter's only effort seems to have been to grey badge heads of state.
That's it.
Like a sloppy highschool effort.
Got visa issues? Need to contact an embassy ?
Let's look just at embassies in the US.
Sure enough, stripped.
From Sweden to Kenya, Kazakhstan to Bahrain...
Good luck figuring out what's real.
Oh and how about Musk's other favorite thing?
Of the top 10 space agencies in the world, only @NASA is verified.
I checked.
Everybody else got stripped.
One thing I'm confident about.
From scammers to coup plotters, terror groups to village trolls: today a lot of people are pondering if/how they might leverage Musk's nearly clean global sweep of verification of governments, agencies, militaries, etc.
Musk just made a crystal clear case to governments & businesses that they should rethink whether & how much they use #twitter for official comms.
And instantly showed *everybody* that Twitter isn't the same place to find instantly-verified official statements that it once was.
There are self owns.
And then there's whatever rapid unforced value destruction this is.
But wait, there's more.
Twitter deleted "state-affiliated media" labels.
I'm sure Russia, China & Iran are tickled.
As we all know, fake lookalike accounts aren't new.
And even *when* official accounts had verification, you could find people mistakenly engaging the fake ones.
Here are some more damming revelations as Intellexa, the shady, sanctioned spyware supplier gets exposed by @AmnestyTech & partners.. /1
2/ First, a mercenary spyware myth has just been busted.
Because the leak shows an Intellexa employee directly accessing a customer deployment.
Prior to the #PredatorFiles leak, spyware companies basically always claimed they couldn't access customer deployments & didn't know what was going on there.
They used this to avoid responsibility & claim ignorance when faced with abuses.
3/ And it gets crazier. The leak shows Intellexa casually accessing a core backbone of Predator deployment of a government customer.
Seemingly without the gov's knowledge.
Suggests that Intellexa can look over their shoulder & watch their sensitive targeting.
NEW: 🇨🇳Chinese hackers ran massive campaign by tricking Claude's agentic AI.
Vibe hacking ran 80-90% of the operation without humans.
Massive scale (1000s of reqs/sec).
Agents ran complex multi-step tasks, shepherded by a human.
Long predicted. Welcome to the new world.
Fascinating report by @AnthropicAI 1/
2/ The old cybersecurity pitch: unpatched systems are the threat.
The next generation concern might be unpatched cognition.
The attacker jailbroke the cognitive layer of @anthropic's Claude code, successfully convincing the system of false intent (that it was a security exercise)
3/ One of the key points in @AnthropicAI's report is just how limited the human time required was to run such a large automated campaign.
Obviously powerful stuff, highlighting the impact of orchestration.
And concerning for the #cybersecurity world for all sorts of reasons, ranging from attack scale, adaptability & cost reductions...
A "damaging" leak of tools from a five eyes exploit developer?
Concerning. We need to know what's under this rug.
Big picture: "trusted, vetted" private sector players offensive cyber are not immune to losing control of tooling... with national security consequences 1/
2/ If true, a tooling leak at boutique firm Trenchant wouldn't be the first time that exploits from commercial offensive vendors wind up... in the wrong place.
Many questions.
In the meantime. Remember when Russian APT29..was caught with exploits first used by NSO & Intellexa?
3/ There will always be a push for states to turn towards the private sector to meet offensive needs.
It's appealing. For some, it's very lucrative.
But in practice it brings unavoidable counterintelligence & national security downside risk that shouldn't be downplayed.