(1) PSA
:::Takes deep breath::
Several years ago, after experiencing severe abuse, I promised myself I’d never again keep other people’s secret of how they’ve treated me. This promise especially applied to how I was treated by White people. I spoke abt it. kylejhoward.com/blog/keeping-a…
(2) I am sharing what I’m about to share b/c I wanna close this chapter & move on, & I do not want to carry the burden of keeping this to myself any longer, especially in light of the fact that I know this info will be weaponized against me if I remain silent.
(3) It’s funny tho, cuz a large segment of White survivor community has me already feeling anxious in this whole thing b/c they’ve already made it abundantly clear “their people” are off limits & if you speak about “their people” they will come for you. Just like Evangelicalism.
(4) This will be my final statement about this situation, and then I am moving on.
Several months ago I spoke up about my first hand experience with a non-profit organization that postures itself as a Care & advocacy resource for church abuse survivors, called Sacred Wilderness.
(5) I was good friends with the founder, was on their podcast where they prized my character & work, and in the past I even helped them work thru public conflict. Thru providence, counselees I has been helping work thru church abuse confided in me abt current pace of employment.
(6) Their place of employment was this org, they sent me non-confidential emails b/t them & employer & it was deeply concerning. I reached out as friend to try & help resolve b4 things escalated & that’s when mistreatment towards me & retaliation towards employees occurred.
(7) @StephDenzer & @MattDenzer have since spoken up for themselves due to indifference of the White survivor community towards those w/o a following so you can go view their accounts for more details. I spoke up after a month of watching founder pretend nothing was happening.
(8) After over a month of pretending all was good, and they were elite in advocacy, & building platform while employees languished, w/ employee permission I spoke…. And I was vilified for it. Org lied & it’s supporters went after my character, credibility, & my work. Update:
(9) The White survivor community invested said they’d essentially ignore the cries of the victims in this situation & “wait for the facts”. The facts the; wait for would come w/ an informed ent 3rd party investigation (all I was wanting, tbh).
That isn’t happening.
(10) This org unilaterally hired a man (Wade Mullen) w/o any feedback. In selection from employees. Wade has not been hired to do an investigation, but hired by org to do a mere organizational assessment in which they will receive only copy of, victims will not receive copy.
(11) Wade Mullen is very well respected with White survivor community & has released a book called “Something’s not Right” about abuse in organizational management, I know him by reputation, but I will say this; based on reputation, this has been surreal.
(12) Wade asked to speak to me as part of his “organizational assessment” (again, not investigation). I shared concerns with Wade regarding the ethics of doing this while hired unilaterally by SW & refusing to give employees copy, trusting SW who has publicly lied w/ only copy…
(13) No hearsay, this was the exchange. First is his, then me, his final reply.
Notice how he refused to acknowledge he was hired by Sacred Wilderness. More importantly, notice how he refused to give me even reassurance that my words wouldn’t be weaponized against survivors.
(14) Wade asked me to sign a contract whereby I would be signing over the rights of an interview recording of myself to him & Sacred Wilderness (an org that has publicly misrepresented/lied about me & has encouraged its supporters to spread false info about me). I’m not a fool.
(15) Whatever comes out regarding organizational assessment Wade is doing, and whatever is said about me for refusing to be a part of it, you have your answer in email above as to the real reason why. I am an abuse survivor advocate & this process serves those accused of abuse.
(16) The Denzers have the power to choose to be a part of the process or not, but I have chosen not to be simply b/c I could not be given any reassurance that they’d be honored & would matter in the process. I have encouraged them not to be as well, for their own protection.
(17) So again, whether it’s of me or them, if you hear we weren’t a part of process cuz we were lying or whatever accusations arise, that isn’t the truth. It’s b/c this situation mirrors what we have all experienced in the abusive churches we have fled. I won’t be party to that.
(18) To the White survivor community, this situation has changed the way I relate to you. I love you all, but your community isn’t safe. I was caring for & protecting members of your community & was devoured for it… by many of you.
I will never stop caring for & advocating.
(19) Your leaders/experts move just like the men who led the spaces my family fled in order to survive. Call me whatever names you want, rub my reputation in the mud, I stand w/ a clear conscience & my work speaks itself among those I’ve cared for. I’m content w/ that.
(20) finally, I just wanna say, I am who I am. I have always sought to be exactly who I have said I am, and it is that consistency that produced this as well as the original call out. I’ve said my piece, my hands are washed, I’m moving on, back to my work of soul care. ✌🏽❤️
(21) I know some of you would’ve preferred I just sat on all this for months & just wait to see how things turn out, but that is a burden/yoke I refuse to carry. I won’t ever be caged again, I’m free. To remain free, I won’t be carrying “secrets” that serve as mental cages.
(22) also, The Denzers deserve better.
(23) The amount of people, survivor advocates even, who are acting like it is totally reasonable & okay for me to be asked to sign a contract to be interviewed & recorded by person paid by people who’ve publicly lied about me w/o even reassurance my words wouldn’t be twisted to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(24) One last point, I support folks waiting for whatever assessment comes. I’m not expecting nor asking for anyone to come to a conclusion based on thread above. All I’ve simply done is shared why I chose not to participate in process, & what process actually is. That’s all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1) BIPOC fam, this is something I’d encourage you all to consider deeply. One of the subtle ways White Supremacy seeks to assert itself is by demanding non-White people’s acquiescence whenever they are “summoned”.
(2) Beloved, you are not obligated to accept that “let’s get coffee”, especially if it’s to hear them explain their racism or make you defend your refusal to assimilate. Just b/c a White person requests your time, energy, & presence doesn’t mean you have to say yes.
(3) When you say no, it is very likely they will try to further manipulate you into submission either with rage or disappointment, guilt or shame, you STILL don’t have to submit to their request of your time, energy, or presence. You are free, beloved.
Don’t get me wrong, Majors must be investigated & held accountable. Looks REALLY bad! I just find it fascinating how quickly he was canceled while Angelina Jolie has spoken out abt Brad Pitt abusing her & his children & celeb women were publicly swooning over him at awards show.
Again, this isn’t a defense of Jonathan Majors, this is a “White men need to be held accountable too & treated the same way Black men are when it comes to accountability for toxic & harmful behavior.” White men most often get a pass. This is a inquiry into “why”.
The amount of pedophiles, rapists, abusers in Hollywood who are White men and are still abounding in Hollywood. Again, I’m just saying, I think there should be the same energy towards White men as there is towards Black men, when it comes to toxic & harmful behavior. That’s all.
(1) Jesus had prostitutes falling before him and while in their knees weeping at his feet, even pouring expensive fragrant oil on them & wiping it with their hair, and yet he at no point sexualized them but rather extended dignity, brotherly compassion, & love towards them.
(2) if is my prayer that men, especially those in positions w/ authority will stop pretending that all the “purity” rules and guidelines they’ve established for girls & women regarding attire has anything to do w/ holiness & not trying to mask their own lack of Christlikeness.
(3) Yeah yo, we should have convos abt dignity, wisdom, & what boys & girls as well as men & women wear. But we can’t begin to have that convo until men stop seeking to blame women for their own lack of Christlikeness & inability to love & dignify rather than lust & objectify.
(1) When I was in seminary, working on my undergrad tho, prior to Masters, I was married with children among a bunch of kids more or less. I remember a class I had where professor prided himself on the fact that he & his wife were not friends. He didn’t like hanging out w/ her.
(2) His whole point in sharing was that he wanted to encourage the men & women in the class, especially the young women, that as they were pursued by men while at college, “friendship” shouldn’t be a criteria for accepting a proposal. What really mattered was if he was “manly”.
(3) Vy & I had an open door policy during that time. If our door wasn’t locked you could come on in. We had college students coming in & out all day every day. We arrived to model marital friendship to them the best we could. A stark contrast to the culture of seminary.
(1) So I've taken some time to look into this situation & I want to share some thoughts. I haven't yet read @MekdesHaddis book & can't speak on its content, but I have read the review of it that was written by a White man (Brad Vaughn @savinggodsface) under pseudonym Jackson Wu.
(2) I want to speak on this briefly for a few reasons. I think Black women deserve to be seen, heard, & defended & I'll use my platform to that end when I can. Also, As a Black man with Asian heritage, a Southeastern Asian wife, & transcultural children; I'm invested in issue.
(3) Don't have much to say beyond how horrible it is for a White man to tear down a Black woman using an Asian pseudonym. To tap into tension b/t Black & Asian communities (created by Whiteness) & twist the knife by appropriating it & using it to attack a Black woman. SMH
(1) Just stumbled across a post, by a woman, that was encouraging women to give their husband's sex whenever, wherever, & however they want it. The encouragement was if wives do so, they would witness their marriages spectacular transform for the positive.
Some thoughts...
(2) First off, the framing of sex as "giving to your husband" rather than as something that is mutually desirable (even if one party desires it more) is deeply problematic & speaks to a profoundly twisted concept of sex. Sex defined as something wives give & husbands take is 🚩.
(3) This whole practice of framing sexual principles in a way that compensates for male emotional & relational disconnectedness, shallowness, selfishness, immaturity, & lack of romantic/intimate intentionality needs to stop. It is harmful to women & to men as well.