Twitter is now "a train wreck but where every car is a dumpster and they're all on fire. And it's crashing" is a helluva way to kick things off from @mathewi#ijf23
The more platforms we have, the better says @CharlieBeckett. And rethinking our relationships with them is only a good thing. #ijf23
Twitter does something which no other platform does, says @emilybell, which is tell the world what is happening right now. Irrespective of status, background and, even, credentials #ijf23
But Elon coming in is like a new developer coming to town, tearing down the buildings and saying "I don't care if that's where you met your friends, it's mine now" #ijf23
In a packed room, @mathewi asks who is paying for Twitter. There is one. Plus @mitrakalita, on stage. "If I refuse to pay for products made by white men whose politics I disagree with, I probably wouldn't eat or have travelled here today" she says #ijf23
There's a danger for journalists of thinking Twitter is the real world, says @CharlieBeckett, and we should not fall into the facade of disproportionality that it can create #ijf23
But in some non-Western countries, where there are real government pressures on media outlets, Twitter can be vital for independent journalists in doing their job and telling their truth says @emilybell#ijf23
So what about Facebook? News made up something like 3% of traffic, says @CharlieBeckett, and they stopped funding it. The pretence of caring about news and journalism is gone #ijf23
There are people about both companies who care about news, but at the top it is about stopping regulation, says @emilybell, regulation which is intended to pass money from one part of the information ecosystem to another #ijf23
Facebook, sure, is a lobbying organisation now, says @mitrakalita, but it was set up to rank women. Thinking that platform cares about a news ecosystem was always a non starter #ijf23
What about other platforms? Mastodon is great but it's predominantly white nerds, says @emilybell, and although it's improving it doesn't do what Twitter does in being a centralised platform where everyone is together #ijf23
Q from the floor: Should platforms be publicly owned? That opens the door to questions around authoritarianism and sustainability, says @CharlieBeckett. It's never going to happen in America, days @emilybell#ij23
"Journalism in the face of American capitalism is like a marshmallow in the face of a dragon" says @emilybell#ijf23
We looked at platforms as referral traffic rather than what we were actually doing on there, says @mitrakalita, which is a fundamental failure.
Very good point: she worries about newsrooms serving platforms rather than serving the people on them #ijf23
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That Trump video is source hacking in real-time: Getting free press with fake and/or outrageous material. It's hacking the media. Same with the red triangle. @BostonJoan's report on the subject should be a must read: datasociety.net/library/source…
We see the same thing in the UK, the fake BLM flyers in Scotland, the fake Brexit notebooks last September. It's very hard to stop because if news orgs don't cover it then it's "a cover up", and if they *do* cover it then it's amplifyimg falsehoods
The best way to cover it is to get to the root and expose and explain the tactics for what they are. But that takes time and resources and patience and none of those things are as well-rewarded in the current media ecosystem as outrage and clicks and emotional button-pushing