A Friday myth-busting Hessian thread. Did you know these troops fought in Scotland during the Jacobite uprising of 1745? There are many myths regarding the Revolutionary War, but none seem as widespread as the idea that the "Hessians" were "mercenaries". 1/37
For those of you who don't know me, I'm an academic historian writing on military culture in the Atlantic World 18th century. I wrote my MA thesis on these troops, and then completed my doctoral work, in part, on the related (not interchangeable) Prussian army. 2/37
In my 11 years of academic work, from the time I entered my MA program to my job as an Assistant Professor now, I have heard many wrong-headed ideas about these troops. Here are a few: 3/37
"These troops should be called Hessians. They were mercenaries. They were sold to America because their princes were greedy. They were drunk on Christmas, and so George Washington beat them. Many of them deserted to stay in America, where life was better." 4/37
All of these ideas are wrong. Or, if they have a grain of truth to them, that grain has been badly distorted. So, without further introduction, let's examine these myths in turn. 5/37
Myth 1): These troops were Hessians. 6/37
Although most came from the mid-sized state of Hessen-Kassel, troops from six different principalities (Hessen-Kassel, Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel, Hessen-Hanau, Ansbach-Bayreuth, Waldeck, and Anhalt-Zerbst.) 7/37
If you include the larger, global war outside America, fought in places like Gibraltar and India, troops from the state of Hanover (Braunschweig-Lüneburg) also fought for the British outside of the Holy Roman Empire (the pre-German territorial entity.) 8/37
So, while over 60% of these troops came from Hessen, they really hailed from all over the western and central Holy Roman Empire. As a result, it might be better to call them something other than Hessians. What else might we call them? Read on. 9/37
Myth 2): They were mercenaries. 10/37
Imagine you are a soldier in the US Army, serving in West Germany during the Cold War. You are stationed there because of longstanding agreements and alliances. The US and the West German government have a financial understanding. Are you a mercenary? 11/37
The situation was very similar for the German-speaking soldiers who fought in the American War of Independence, They had a longstanding relationship with Great Britain, stretching back decades. 12/37
As a result of the Hanoverian succession in 1714 (the British Royal family was drawn from Hanover) they had longstanding marriage connections with Great Britain. Horace Walpole, a British politician from the 1730s, referred to the Hessians as the Triarii of Great Britain. 13/37
These soldiers did not personally or corporately take on contracts from the British. they were members of state militaries: their governments were paid a subsidy by the British in order to fight in their wars. 14/37
As a result, the modern German term for these troops is Subsidientruppen, or subsidy troops. Thus, it might be better to speak of the German-speaking subsidy troops, as opposed to calling them Hessians, or mercenaries. 15/37
Myth 3): They were sold to America because their princes were greedy and wanted to build palaces and pay for their illegitimate children. 16/37
The princes of the Western Holy Roman Empire lived in an incredibly dangerous world during the eighteenth century. Their territories were small, rural, principalities, trapped between the military giants of France, Austria, and Prussia. 17/37
As a result, from the 1670s, these princes attempted to use subsidy contracts to build themselves larger armies, in order to preserve their independence. These subsidy contracts were a standard feature of European politics, diplomacy, and conflict resolution. 18/37
They allowed the princes to better protect their small domains. None of the princes who formed subsidy contracts with Britain during the American War of Independence were doing something radically new or greedy. 19/37
The Hessian (Hessen-Kassel) Landgraf Friedrich II actually used the funds from the contract, in part, to promote economic development and the textile industry in his territories. Some of them had illegitimate children. Some had palaces. 20/37
Portraying them as sex-crazed misers limits our understanding of the economic and security necessities which actually underpinned their subsidy policies. 21/37
Myth 4): The troops committed many brutal war-crimes in America. 22/37
The subsidy troops had been used in messy civil conflicts before. Hessian troops were used against the Jacobites in 1745-6, where they remarkably refused to take part in the repression against the Scottish Jacobites. 23/37
Their troops were remembered in Perthshire, Scotland, as "a gentle race," and their commanding Prince (Friedrich II) declared, "My Hessians and I have been called to fight the enemies of the British crown, but never will we consent to hang or torture in its name." 24/37
English officers in the Seven Years War, noted that their troops were reprimanded for plundering more than Hessian forces. In North America during the War of Independence, the Hessians once again behaved better than their British counterparts. 25/37
English officers in the Seven Years War, noted that their troops were reprimanded for plundering more than Hessian forces. In North America during the War of Independence, the Hessians once again behaved better than their British counterparts. 26/37
Although there was a surge of fear about Hessian brutality early in the war, after the first few years of the war, Americans believed that the Hessians treated them better than British soldiers. 27/37
Aaron Burr wrote of Hessian atrocities: "Various have been the reports concerning the barbarities committed by the Hessians, most of them [are] incredible and false." 28/37
Comparing the brutality of the Napoleonic Wars with the American War of Independence, a veteran who served in both wars commented: "Everything which the author has subsequently seen in this regard greatly exceeds what one should term cruelty in America…” 29/37
"...which in comparison with more recent times, can be regarded as nothing more than a harmless puppet show." 30/37
Hessian troops committed crimes in America, there is no doubt. What is clear is that these crimes were not excessive for an eighteenth-century conflict. 31/37
Myth 5): Many of them deserted to America, where life was better. 32/37
Many Americans claim Hessian ancestry. As a result, it is common to encounter the sentiment that these "mercenary" troops were simply waiting to switch sides. In reality, most of these troops returned to their homelands in the Holy Roman Empire. 33/37
A very small number switched sides before the end of the war, a larger (but still small) percentage elected to remain in America after the war ended in 1783. Far from an act of rebellion, the princes encouraged their subsidy troops to remain in America if they desired: 34/37
this would cut costs, and make the process of slashing the military budget easier in peacetime. Most returned to celebrations, public parades, and being welcomed by loved ones. The majority of these troops remained loyal to their princes, and returned home. 35/37
Who Were the Hessians?
The experience of 37,000 soldiers mainly drawn from six small counties is not all one thing. There are elements of truth to each of the myths about the Hessians, but their story is more complex than the myths that are told about them in the USA. 36/37
For more on these troops, check out Dr. Friederike Baer's new book, "The Hessians." amazon.com/Hessians-Germa…
37/37
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dr. Taylor has some great thoughts here. You should read his thread. I'll add some short ideas of my own:
This practice (hiring elite ABDs) isn't just bad for adjuncts contingent scholars, also harms the non-prestigious departments who engage in this practice. Why? 1/12
This is a pretty harsh thread where I am hard on the practice of hiring elite ABDs. Most of these elite scholars are great people (and minds) who are looking to further their careers, and that is a good thing. This thread is based on my personal experiences, YMMV. 2/12
Many hired elite ABDs view their first placement as a quasi-post doc. At the regional public R1 university I attended for PhD school, the prestigious recent hires couldn't wait to get out. As a result, they left as soon as they were offered another position. 3/12
As promised, a firepower Friday thread. How many rounds could 18th cent. troops fire a minute? Military history enthusiasts have a strong views on this, and its a pretty contentious topic. TL;DR, in combat troops fired 2-3 rounds a minute. 1/28
From the sequence in the (in?)famous Sharpe series depicting the training of the South Essex Regiment, to many reenactors demonstrating their own skills, the desire to show that musket-armed troops could fire quickly dominates media produced regarding the era. 2/28
The best Sharpe bit is: "The trick is, to keep the muzzle up to stop the bloody bullet falling out. Of course, the muzzle needs to point up anyway, the frog coming towards you is high up on a horse." Since, you know, the French only sent cavalry to fight in the Peninsula. 3/28
Yesterday, I accepted a tenure-track history professorship. I'm grateful and excited to work in my field! With that said, History is in trouble. For my wargaming/reenacting followers who might not know, prospects are bleak for #twitterstorians . History needs help. 1/24
Re: my job, I don't have the space here to thank everyone who helped me along the way. Pride of place has to go to my supportive parents and my loving wife. I couldn't have done it without you. I'm grateful for my professors, fellow students, and friends for their support. 2/24
I have benefitted from having two truly great mentors and inspirations in my life: Katherine B. Aaslestad (my Doktormutter) and Christopher Duffy. Both aren't with us anymore, but I've done my best to make them proud. 3/24
After my thread earlier in the week about women following Central European armies, I was asked to gather some images of women associated with the British army. Here is that thread. The picture below is an example of the work by Molly Picture Studio. facebook.com/mollypicturest… 1/11
David Morier's image of a woman with the British army in the low countries in the 1740s 2/11
A woman in a British camp during the Seven Years War (c. 1760) 3/11
A thread on the social background of 18th cent. soldiers. Was the average soldier, "the scum of the earth", in the 18th century? TL;DR, these men usually came from working backgrounds, some even held specialist careers before enlisting. Most were not criminal fringe elements 1/20
If the average soldier did not enlist until between 21 and 25, what did he do before enlistment? In eighteenth-century armies, before enlistment, as many as 50% of men were unskilled day-laborers, or agricultural workers who did not own land. 2/20
While not moving in the highest circles of society, these men were not necessarily criminals or untrustworthy characters: they simply sold their labor and owned no land. Indeed, in most European, or American societies of the 18th cent, most people fell into this category. 3/20
Don't worry, we'll have a poll this afternoon (as soon as I can think of something), but something to tide your eighteenth-century needs over.
I got a talking to about making memes this week, so here are a some more.
Professional historians can have a chuckle too, you'll find.