I get why Floridians and "return to normalcy" people like DeSantis. But show me anything he believes that will get him Deep Stated if elected

If Trump wasn't enough, I don't want "normalcy." I want Double Trump. I don't want the Ronald Reagan of the 2020s


Trump isn't weird, he's extremely normal. The media/Deep State etc went into freakout mode when he connected with normal people, that's *why* they went insane

If DeSantis can't freak out our ruling class, then he will simply extend our ruling class
Arguing to the "normies" who already believe in this bullshit is a loser's game, at absolute best you get a short-lived reaction that swiftly passes. Much like Reagan

If you're not saying things that will get you got, you're already done
You have to awaken parts of them they thought were already dead. Theoden gripping his sword moments

*That* is what the ideology goes insane about. When our human instincts they'd reduced to ashes get inflamed again, by somebody willing to speak to them, and fan them back up.
There is no more "normalcy," you have to accept that is gone now, a relic of the past that can't be returned to.

You get to decide which new normal you choose: the one that thinks we're all the same

Or the guy who blurts out we should have more Norwegians and less Haitians

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS

Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @17cShyteposter

Mar 19
This is what Houellebecq constantly describes through literature, the extension of thought embodied by Huxley ('30s) into Lennon ('60s), which H's own mother believed in, and left him raised by his grandparents, and when his characters live the same lifestyle, find deadening
Within H.'s "lived experience," the utopia of "Imagine nothing to kill or die for" means, in practice, being abandoned by your hedonist parents who hate you while watching your nation commit a paralyzed self-euthanasia because it hates itself

Leaving nothing ImageImage
Do you guys ever just put the radio on while driving around, and listen to classic rock (sometimes "oldies" now), and listen to the lyrics, the stuff they were *hoping* for?

It's fucking weird. Deluded. Whatever they wanted, it's not human.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9
In celebration of the 25th anniversary of the first English translation of Houellebecq's first novel, WHATEVER, here is what he had to say about the impacts of therapy on those who most promote it

Compare to the average (former) blue check journalist and see if you disagree 🤔
Whenever someone promotes "therapy" or any of these other post-war idiocies, rather than a "fact-check" or whatever, they should just come attached with the absolute nastiest thing Houellebecq ever said on the subject

See which is more convincing, some journo, or H.
Btw this was an interesting Houellebecq in that it is definitely a "first novel" (at least his first novel able to publish)

The story is very thin but the voice and especially his observations are so sharp you see why they were compelled to publish it
Read 4 tweets
Mar 4
Modern leftism is so dumb its biologists don't accept there is ethnic variation between strength, speed, intelligence, or height

Imagine thinking that is pseudoscience when we have Bajau spleens or the huge divergence between Tibetan and Andean evo-response to high altitude life


Modern leftism is so dumb it thinks intelligence is advantageous in all environments when we, right now, are living in an era that is actively selecting for lower intelligence

But maybe this explains their existence
In case you want "proof," it's clear that intelligence was selected for in the Middle Ages, net-neutral in the early Industrial Age, and a clear negative in the Modern Age

If you don't think income/education was directly associated with G, you just might be... a modern leftist
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14
Lmao. You are literally the guy who caused the ultra-leftist Brazilian Supreme Court to undo all of Pres. Luna's charges, just so you could get rid of Bolsonaro, the "threat to democracy" who might have actually reformed your hyper-authoritarian court

You get what you deserve
I'm sorry that your liberalism is dead, but it's certainly not the right that killed it, that's been made perfectly clear by the ruling powers' response to Trump, and Bolsonaro, etc. They're just reformers

But it's been made perfectly clear the regime will allow no reform.
I've always thought it was funny when people did the "You support censorship now, but just wait till they come for *you*!", because I never thought that would apply to the left

But it now, seemingly, does apply to Greenwald. Because the world he's fighting for no longer exists.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 22, 2022
It's still insane to me that Hoeullebecq was making arguments like this a generation ago and I'm still only hearing them stated—at least this plainly—when I go back and read him

I believe this exhaustion is the fundamental condition of liberalism. Its Rosetta Stone Image
He hit this point even harder a few years later in The Elementary Particles, where he dramatized this condition as a paralysis that *leads* to the exhaustion

Infinite choice, total freedom, leads paradoxically to the inability to judge, and thus to act, subverting the will
The thing that *clobbered* me about Elementary Particles was how he also correctly diagnosed the two promises of post-War liberal human ascendance—science, and sex—and wrecked the both of them

It's made dramatically clear that something critically human is missing from both
Read 5 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
If wokeness is liberalism completing its internal logic and moving on to left-wing authoritarianism, this is seen very clearly here

Explicit + neutral mod policies were rapidly replaced with ones where the mods just banned anyone they didn't like—including our then-US President
The true nature of democracy—that it had already become this, and has been for a long time—was supposed to stay hidden

Say whatever you want about Trump, he got this, instinctively, and forced them to reveal this, that the entire thing is fake and gay
No part of this was inevitable. Except for Trump, we would have had Jeb, or Rubio, or maybe best case Cruz

But none of these would have *forced* the regime to step out from the curtain, and ban them, and prove they can and *will* ban the president if he opposes their ideology
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(