Important piece by @DavidBlock on how extremist voices in the Iranian Diaspora - in the name of the legitimate protesters in Iran - engaged in horrendous threats, harassment & silencing of debate.
2. Shahrooz engaged in threats and harassment, accusing skeptics of sanctions of "fellating" the Iranian FM, calling them Nazis and "collaborators." Ebrahimi told an Iranian human rights defender that when the regime falls, it will be “a sad and scary day in your life.” >>
3. Victims of Shahrooz and Ebrahimi, which include @nytimes reporter @farnazfassihi, have endured death threats, rape threats, and in the case of @NegarMortazavi, even bomb threats.
And all of this, supposedly, in the name of bringing democracy to Iran. >>
4. As Block writes, contrary to Shahrooz and Ebrahimi's claims, their victims are not supporters of the Iranian regime but proponents of a more nuanced debate on Iran as well as dialogue and diplomacy.>>
5. But instead of debating the merits of various Iran policy options, the likes of Shahrooz and Ebrahimi have engaged in efforts to cancel their political opponents for months. Again, in the name of democracy. >>
6. Where Block doesn't dig deep enough, though, is the likely state-sponsored dimension of Shahrooz and Ebrahimi's activities. Inauthentic engagement on Twitter has dramatically boosted their attacks and harassment. Much suggests there is more to this story...//
Sorry, this was written by @dblock94, not David Block
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a thoughtful thread, hopefully the beginning of a good conversation. After months of massive social media manipulation, threat and cancellation campaigns, the unleashing of these undemocratic forces is predictably starting to target those who either supported it or...>>
...remained silent as long as they themselves were not targeted. @dblock94's article does a good job in showing how the silencing of debate and other fascist methods does not serve the cause of democracy in Iran. As he writes, those targeted at first were not supporters of...>>
...the regime, but supporters of nuance. When nuanced debate is strangled, matters start to move in an undemocratic direction very fast. The infighting in the exiled "opposition" and how they now have turned the cancellation and defamation tools against each other now was...>>
As China is seeking to mediate peace from the Mideast to Ukraine, this should be a moment of reflection for us. There was a time when all roads to peace went through Washington.
2. America prides itself on NOT being an impartial mediator. We take sides to be “on the right side of history” since we view statecraft as a battle between good & evil rather than the pragmatic management of conflict where peace inevitably comes at the expense of some justice>>
3. We started to follow a different playbook. Today, our leaders mediate to help “our” side in a conflict advance our position rather than to establish a lasting peace. We do it to demonstrate the value of allying with the United States. >>
🧵
Shockingly, it turns out that some of the blobbers close to the Democratic party who’ve taken it upon themselves to police the Left and kill all debate - in the name of saving Democracy, mind you - seem to have no clue what the Biden's policy on Ukraine actually is.>>
2. With the revelation that Biden actually is engaging in direct, US-Russia diplomacy - which the retracted CPC letter called for - a few conclusions can now be drawn. >> wsj.com/articles/senio…
3. First of all, those working overtime to make diplomacy a dirty word in Washington are not doing Biden any favors. They viciously attacked the CPC for having the audacity to encourage Biden to do what Biden already was secretly doing. >>
🧵Difficult not to be struck by how the current #IranProtests2022 differ from those in 2009. The latter was about a stolen election and a fight within the current system re reform. They tended to be non-violent.
The anger and frustration today are FAR greater. >>
2. For two decades, attempts at reforming the system have been stymied. The regime has responded with violence, stealing elections - and marginalizing and imprisoning those seeking peaceful reforms.
>>
3. The conclusion many young Iranian women and men appear to have reached is that attempts at reform from within should be abandoned. Two decades of failure is enough. They boycotted the last election. Their anger is immeasurable - and legitimate. >>
🧵Against all odds, the Iran nuclear deal is on the verge of being revived. But the new JCPOA will be more fragile than its predecessor and born into a geopolitical context that reduces rather than bolsters its longevity. Here's how to make it stick >>
2. Rather than building trust, mismatched expectations have turned the diplomacy of the past 16 months into a trust-depleting exercise. The Iranians have refused direct talks. Biden wasted time early on and seemed more concerned about pleasing Israel than reviving the deal.
>>
3. In addition, Biden has been unwilling to agree to measures that would deter a future American President from repeating Trump's folly of exiting the deal. All in all, neither side counts on the deal lasting beyond 2025. >>
🧵With Biden expected to signal the US's return to the Iran Nuclear Deal as early as today, here's a brief thread on what that means and what needs to come next:
>>
2. The Iran nuclear deal serves US interests, full stop. It blocks all of Iran's pathways to a bomb while preventing a disastrous US-Iran war. And by reducing US-Iran tensions, it also opens the way for the US to bring American servicemen and women home from the Middle East.>>
3. Biden should be commended, but focus has to now shift towards making the revived JCPOA durable. It can still be scuttled by the next US Prez. Surviving one American exit was nothing short of a miracle. Overcoming a second American withdrawal may prove an impossibility.
>>