When I wrote what became the first chapter of THE UNDERTOW, on Harry Belafonte, his 1959 TV special--one of the best hours of television ever made--was watchable only in an archive. Now it's on Youtube. 1/
"Tonight With Belafonte" was one of the best hours ever of broadcast television. It was also one of the most radical. 2/
Mr. B--Harry Belafonte--was a profoundly generous man. But he wasn't shy about his edge, and he wielded it precisely. Here he is in The Undertow telling me about how he got Odetta on primetime: 3/
When I began writing about Harry Belafonte, he invited me to a movie--Zero Percent, on a prison college program. So I got to invite him to one, too--we screened his '59 special together at the archive. It's from a comment he made in the dark that the title of the chapter came. 4/
Part of what I loved about Mr. B. was the way he didn't fall for authenticity traps. He understood art is something you make your own and then pass on. Here he is telling me about discovering Leadbelly's music in the Library of Congress. 5/
Belafonte picked up his most famous song, "Day-O," on the Jamaican docks. I opened my creative writing class this morning w/ it. Students all recognized it, none knew Belafonte, all thought it sort of a kids' song. It's a radical song. Here's how Mr. B. explained it: 6/
Not enough people know what an absolutely crucial roll Belafonte played in the civil rights movement, as both a kind of bank and a confidante to King. A man King could laugh with: 7/
Mr. B. wasn't a saint. Didn't believe in saints. Had no time for the Hollywood version of the Civil Rights Movement. He knew the struggle is long, and not over. 8/
I begin The Undertow with my story of Mr. B. for its hope. That hope isn't any kind of cheap grace. It's not the hope that comes from winning but from staying in the struggle despite the losses. The hope we need. 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Caffeinated from a late night drive and freaked out by *how* bad the coverage of Trump Sec Def Pete Hegseth is, I decided to start reading his new book, The War on Warriors. A thread. The new Pentagon chief begins by bragging he was pushed out for being an "extremist"...
Gist of new Sec Def Hegseth's book War on Warrios, per intro, seems to be that the military is anti-white, conquered by a "diverse" "infection" intent on breaking the military--which would be treason. Which justifies the self-declared "extremism" of his response.
Not a good time to be a woman in the military under new Sec Def Pete Hegseth (formerly a stalled major), who repeatedly speaks of it as a place for "normal men." Black women will face even more trouble. And here is a Pentagon leader openly attacking US troops. 3/
I've been reporting on rightwing movements 20 years. Starting Jan 6, 2021, I began working on a book about what I believed was an age of Trump anything but over. IThe Undertow: Scenes from a Slow Civil War. I'm not peddling it now. I'm trying to give as much as I can away. 1/
The Undertow is about the age of Trump--the Trumpocene--but I decided to begin with... Harry Belafonte. The singer. Day-O. Seriously. Because the kind of hope he held on to all his days of freedom struggle is what we need now. We need to remember that the struggle is long. 2/
We lost Belafonte last year. A joyous man; also, angry all his days. He was one of MLK's closest allies. He never stopped fighting. Again and again, he saw comrades go down. Children killed. Here's what he said: 3/
I think it’s important to know how much FOX News is putting into conspiracy theories around the Butler PA assassin. There are many reasons for this, but bottom line is how dangerous it is: this is civil war thinking. Thread 1/
Today on Fox, Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson said he’s seen persuasive evidence of a second shooter. (He’s talking about a YouTube.) He says a mysterious man in a suit told local law to send photos to someone who has “gone dark.” (That is, he has no proof.) 2/
Sen. Johnson told Fox News that the FBI & Secret Service are compromised agencies—he’s speaking the language of spy thrillers—and thus nothing they say can be trusted. He calls for public to send him “evidence”—inviting viewers to imagine themselves within the drama.3/
Evaluating Trump's speech according to democracy's laws of physics makes as much sense as declaring what we don't know about black holes "impossible." Fascism exerts a different gravity. The speech fuses the base; it's the "confidence" of the base that draws in "undecideds."
That's how fascism "works." It doesn't have to be how fascism wins. But defeating it, I suspect, means at least a larger number of us discarding our reassurance narratives. Looking at the awfulness dead on, & fighting *that,* not what we wish it was.
Trump, of course, is a grotesque; he broadcasts, and only some receive. But many of those aren't, in everyday life, grotesques. It's *their* belief that persuades some. Their confidence. Their delusion. Trump speeches fuel *them,* are for them, not for undecideds.
I was going to go to Vegas to report Trump's first rally as a felon--not for "news" but to listen for tone, for the mood of fascism as it mutates. But I decided it was too hot, so I stayed in VT & watched 5 hrs of it from an obscure rightwing network. And I made pictures... 1/
The image above: “Costumes of sorts,” proclaims one of the two broadcasters, Vanessa Broussard. Then, as if on cue, right behind her, a “costume”--the man in the sombrero. My article continues w/ the juxtaposition of the grotesque & the absurd in service of fascist hysteria: 2/
I never stick to the press pen when I report Trump rallies. I wait in line for hours like anyone else, the better to hear the ways in which fascist anger doesn't just stagnate, it expands. Lucky for me, my "proxies" on this obscure RW channel try the same: 3/
Trump returns to Fox today. Strongman rhetoric from get-go, in response to q on how best to seek "revenge": "Lotta people said, 'We have no choice but to elect Trump, because he's only one who can withstand this." Basic fascist trope: Great Leader can do what mortals can't. 1/
Q&A continues as if everyone knows that the fundamental fight is America, as embodied in Trump, vs. "Intel," as in intelligence agencies, as in "deep state." By making it a given, Trump & Fox sweep their viewers into conspiracism as if it's simple as "they sky is blue." 2/
"Intel," Trump says--embodied for the sake of his "point" by Comey--is "evil... They were doing things I won't mention here because it's so conspiratorial." Cue Q; viewers choose their own "evil"; he & Fox knowsmany will think child trafficking. He doesn't say it but says it. 3/