A Binomial distribution will only work if the bet size stays stagnant or a $ amount, while the question was formulated with a % betting system.
We will calculate both, but for now the Montecarlo system is the better fit
In order to get a high certainty over the max drawdown, likeliest outcome and best outcome we would need to run all possible outcomes and calculate the certainty levels like 95% between X1 and X2
Using a Monte Carlo system, this is what we get via HowToTrade.com
With 100 trades, the confidence intervals are simply not meaningful enough to calculate.
Truth is when it comes to a % bet method, it is hard to calculate the likelihood to be up after the 100 tries with confidence. The spread simply too high.
The confidence level is very important as it will dictate the risk level you truly want to take.
This goes from the exposure to black swans(max amount of following losers) as well as the percentage needed to make back deep pullbacks.
Now to the Binomial distribution:
The binomial distribution can be used in trading strategy calculations to model the probability of a certain number of successful trades out of a fixed number of total trades.
It helps with with the confidence level!
The Binomial distribution
How can we calculate it?
n = number of trials (here 100 trades)
k = number of successes (winning trades)
p = probability of success on a single instance
I personally use a python package to help me calculate it through the package scipy.stats with jupyter notebook.
How do you read a Binomial distribution?
For our example:
x-axis: possible number of successes
y-axis: probability of each possible number of successes.
Each value represents the probability of having that many successes in the given number of trades.
The question was difficult because the % to the account approach is different than a fixed amount and that is where most failed.
Chatgpt and alike failed to understand the shifting nature of the betting size. A binomial dist. only works with the same betting size each time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Kept it simple today. Semis short.
Let's go through the choices:
$ARM
-Fresh breakout
-3 day acceptance low 160s
-ATR candle
-No gap
->🚫
$SMCI
-Fresh breakout
-AIx news
-3rd green day
-No ATR candle
-Gap
-Long consolidation period (multimonth) and acceptance of 900s
->🚫
$AVGO
-Gap fill 70$ lower
-Weakness vs group last trading day
-Clear breakdown area $1,790
-Run from 1450 to 1850 or 30% within 4 days
-Big rejection volume last sessione
->🚫✅
This one is a different setup as the most extended mean reversion. I saw this one as the laggard and as the one with the biggest need for more structure and gap fill.
I expected this one to drift off easier than the rest and give a beta trade to the sector.
$MU
- 11% extension straight green
- 3rd day green streak(3rd being today)
- Big exhaustion volume last session
- Clear resistance level as last session highs
-None ideal bearish pin bar candle last session
->✅
The only reason I wasn't on this one was my personal history with the ticker which made me avoid it. I was long MU as one of my biggest bets at 60 a few months ago and cut it on the Chinese ban news which ended up not being material through the AI boom.
$NVDA
- Full extension candle last session
- Whole number 140
- Big gap
- Price acceptance low 130s
- No multi green candle setup
- 3 Trillion market cap now
- Cramer comment ('so far so good on holding...'
- Most liquid
-Clear target (136.5 support and gap fill)
Post open comments:
-Massive 140 seller wall
-Clear breakdown levels:
->139.5->VWAP->Lod
-> Easiest to pyramid and manage
->✅
Overall I was not super interested in the trade, but wanted to participate given the gaps. Given we did not have multiple green days and option expiry or similar, I wanted to participate until panic showed up.
I expected the bounce to be big and for the move to be over post the rebalance and stopouts. This is not what a general sector blowoff looks like in my view.
We had multiple great earnings, news and breakouts on 1/2 of the semi names. These need to either show a true blowoff or a non-event like reaction to great news and it does not look like it.
On top it seems like fintwit was ready for this short as well which doesnt show much fomo for these long moves.
Now can this be the top? Sure, but it is very easy to get wrecked shorting a bubble or strong trend and given the grade of the setups, I did not want to find out.
Hope this helps.
I trade through CenterPoint, my broker of choice.
We put together in offer for you all to be able to minimize the costs for the best platforms I use on a daily
Their offer?
Free access to:
@TradeIdeasLLC
@tradersync
@DilutionTracker
@TrendSpider
@Benzinga
The entire sector was dumping right off the gates. I decided to enter both $NVDA and $AVGO quickly.
$AVGO was already on the way by such a margin that I decided to make it a beta position, with less size and with a stop on a 1800 reclaim (with a squeeze protection which is why I had a hard order just under).
The goal was to get the potential opportunity for a range breakdown or similar setup to add more size.
on $NVDA I wanted to stop on a 140 breakout and let it test and get a feel for the selling actually done.
I did not want to let it open up into mid 140s with full size.
I cut 1/2 on that breakout and as soon as we rejected the 140 level I had a clear resistance at todays highs to risk off of.
I added and added big on the 139.5 break once we had proven to reject the 140s multiple times and failed to push after an attempted reclaim.
Goal was to cover into support and so I did.
___
Big caps are very different than small caps. They can panic one second and proceed to grind all day right after.
Big caps need to be managed with great care and speed. The goal for me on these always is a clear support area and to stop out right after I see even a remote failed followthrough post test.
Side notes:
-The most successful big cap setups start working within 30min.
-V bottoms are very common on strong sectoral moves
-Clear hole numbers are your biggest friend
-Having the gift of multiple stops is the only way to truly get big (140, vwap, open, lod).
Completely out and not looking to restart. the entire extension has been worked off intraday and balance seems found.
Nice and easy day with a different approach.
I will talk about $NVDA below.
$GME cut quickly yesterday and lost -$100k, a fairly small loss which allowed me to come back very easily.
I did not want a directional bias, but what was clear is the rubberband type action and jumpy spread. Each price level would get tested 5 times before moving lower or higher.
I took advantage of it but consitently playing off of the stop orders and swipes.
0 losses today.
$NVDA is the type of setup I would have played in the past, but my $TSLA trade earlier this year that @TheOneLanceB touched on made me stay away.
Main points:
$NVDA got extended through its gap up through earnings, setting a new accepter balance higher.
Shortly after we saw it accept a new range higher, again moving the balance.
It only gave us one extension day on lower volume... Not at all what I would call an A+.
To top it off it is not Friday so the option expiry aspect also did not fit perfectly.
(side note: interest rates lower in the ECB and lower yields in the US played a role as well as multiples will be able to expand as long as the economy does not implode).
$TSLA trade in question.
A heavy size long trade for me on the swing side that I started at about 120 and kept on getting stopped out on before giving up.
The main lesson was the price acceptance and new balance.
It was not a continuous crash on exploding volume (4 volume important here).
I would have liked to see gap downs, no acceptance small candles, big red candles and the whole number as well.
A trade that truly hurt from a psychological perspective as it proved us right in the end, but through the lack of perfect setup formed in a different manner than expected.
I won't post many more of these but for the sake of explaining the type of risk management I am implementing here is one example from today.
$NVDA -13% and $SMCI -16% in a straight line on the bigger timeframes.
The trade was simple.
$NVDA was running back towards its opening range top and over VWAP while $SMCI was still working through the supply.
Waited for a clear RR and for the structure to confirm and took it for a chase back towards the 'semi equilibrium'
7$ risk vs 15$ reward
A small yet easy managed trade with a reduced fat tail risk.
Moving on right away.
The only reason I would take this trade is because of the combination of the daily and intraday into a move driven by the daily but where the risk is dictated by the intraday.