A Binomial distribution will only work if the bet size stays stagnant or a $ amount, while the question was formulated with a % betting system.
We will calculate both, but for now the Montecarlo system is the better fit
In order to get a high certainty over the max drawdown, likeliest outcome and best outcome we would need to run all possible outcomes and calculate the certainty levels like 95% between X1 and X2
Using a Monte Carlo system, this is what we get via HowToTrade.com
With 100 trades, the confidence intervals are simply not meaningful enough to calculate.
Truth is when it comes to a % bet method, it is hard to calculate the likelihood to be up after the 100 tries with confidence. The spread simply too high.
The confidence level is very important as it will dictate the risk level you truly want to take.
This goes from the exposure to black swans(max amount of following losers) as well as the percentage needed to make back deep pullbacks.
Now to the Binomial distribution:
The binomial distribution can be used in trading strategy calculations to model the probability of a certain number of successful trades out of a fixed number of total trades.
It helps with with the confidence level!
The Binomial distribution
How can we calculate it?
n = number of trials (here 100 trades)
k = number of successes (winning trades)
p = probability of success on a single instance
I personally use a python package to help me calculate it through the package scipy.stats with jupyter notebook.
How do you read a Binomial distribution?
For our example:
x-axis: possible number of successes
y-axis: probability of each possible number of successes.
Each value represents the probability of having that many successes in the given number of trades.
The question was difficult because the % to the account approach is different than a fixed amount and that is where most failed.
Chatgpt and alike failed to understand the shifting nature of the betting size. A binomial dist. only works with the same betting size each time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The power of stoicism isn't in suppressing emotions, it's in treating them as temporary guests, tolerating their presence, and freeing yourself from identifying with them.'
Stoics aren't robots.
They experience the full range of emotions like anyone else.
The difference is they have a better relationship with their emotions.
Emotions are like guests.
They come, they go.
You are the host.
You are in control.
The problem revolves around the inability to tolerate negative emotions.
They view them as something bad to get rid of.
That's a mistake.
When you try to suppress emotions or push them away, they only grow stronger.
Kering owns newer luxury fashion brands while LVMH owns a broader portfolio of older money brands.
Here are brands they own:
Kering:
Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, Alexander McQueen, Balenciaga, Kering Eyewear.
LVMH:
Celine, Christian Dior, FENDI, Givenchy, Louis Vuitton, Marc Jacobs, Bulgari, Tiffany & Co, Château d'Yquem, Dom Pérignon, Ruinart, Moët & Chandon, Hennessy.
It seems like the 'social status' rich cut down on expenses while the deep, old money is still spending without slowing down.
Could this be showing a slowdown in upper middle class spending?