Prakash (Ate-a-Pi) Profile picture
Apr 26, 2023 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🤯 Palantir demo’ed a battlefield assistant calling in drones and quarterbacking a battle in Eastern Europe.

I’m sure @ESYudkowsky is going to be pleased at how fast this is moving.

🧵 👇 Image
1) it’s a chatbot!
But with federated data retrieval based on intelligence classification access rules Image
2) notifications 📣 come in to the chatbot (this is 🤖 bot prompting human) first time I’ve seen in any demo

Reminds me of Command and Conquer : “Alert: Anomalous military activity detected” Image
3) Dynamic content UI - maps, graphics, form field.. chat bot generates whatever it needs in the chat window

“Show me more” Image
4) order a surveillance drone in chat! Image
5) see drone response in real time in chat window ! Image
6) generate attack option recommendations Image
7) send attack approval from chain of command! Image
8) battlefield route planning in chat Image
9) weapons inventory analysis in chat Image
10) individual target 🎯 assignment! Image
11) amazing stuff. Palantir really providing value to the DoD.

Model they used was GPT-NeoX-20B fine tuned, though they have a Flan-T5 XL and a Dolly-v2-12b.

I’m sure @AiEleuther will be thrilled 😁

Best integrated AI I’ve seen. 2 years ahead.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prakash (Ate-a-Pi)

Prakash (Ate-a-Pi) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @8teAPi

Jan 13
Early signs of the acceleration Week 1/2025

AI is designing superior wireless chips outside the normal design space
👇 🧵 Image
I hated wireless antenna design in college because it was the most non scientific tradition bound guildlike cult where the older engineers would drop by and sigh and tell you “that won’t work in practice”… glad it’s getting figured out
Type 1 diabetes cured for the first time with no immune suppressing drugs
Read 6 tweets
Dec 5, 2024
114 million views in 7 days
> Historic really
> How did it happen? 🧵below 👇
Wed Nov 27 8.38 pm - The newly titled Dr Louks, posts the following after a verbal defense of her PhD thesis in Cambridge, England

Thu Nov 28 11.51 am - the first congratulations come in from an assistant professor at the University of Zakho in Iraqi Kurdistan

1.57 pm - after perhaps a hundred congratulations, many with smell based puns, a few quizical shrugs, the first truly negative response

Read 34 tweets
Sep 13, 2024
o1 personal testing megathread 🧵

Bookmark if you need to, just keeping track of reactions since a lot of us have held out personal test sets
Read 12 tweets
Apr 20, 2024
Zuck on Dwarkesh

TLDR: AI winter is here. Zuck is a realist, and believes progress will be incremental from here on. No AGI for you in 2025.

1) Zuck is essentially an real world growth pessimist. He thinks the bottlenecks start appearing soon for energy and they will be take decades to resolve. AI growth will thus be gated on real world constraints.
> "I actually think before we hit that, you're going to run into energy constraints. I don't think anyone's built a gigawatt single training cluster yet. You run into these things that just end up being slower in the world."
> "I just think that there's all these physical constraints that make that unlikely to happen. I just don't really see that playing out. I think we'll have time to acclimate a bit."

2) Zuck would stop open sourcing if the model is the product
> "Maybe the model ends up being more of the product itself. I think it's a trickier economic calculation then, whether you open source that."

3) Believes they will be able to move from Nvidia GPUs to custom silicon soon.
> "When we were able to move that to our own silicon, we're now able to use the more expensive NVIDIA GPUs only for training. At some point we will hopefully have silicon ourselves that we can be using for at first training some of the simpler things, then eventually training these really large models."

Opinion
Overall, I was surprised by how negative the interview was.
A) Energy - Zuck is pessimistic about the real world growth necessary to support the increase in compute. Meanwhile the raw compute per unit energy has doubled every 2 years for the last decade. Jensen also is aware of this, and it beggars belief that he does not think of paths forward where he has to continue this ramp.
Over at , the launch announcement read "At xAI, we have made maximizing useful compute per watt the key focus of our efforts."
So energy efficiency, algorithmic and otherwise are obvious areas where firms will be focused on. Zuck meanwhile is planning to move of Nvidia chips soon, and basically believing that the value in AI available to having a share of the most advanced compute clusters will declline.

B) AGI Negative
Zuck fundamentally
> does not believe the model, the AI itself, will be the product.
> It is the context, the network graph of friendships per user, the moderation, the memory, the infrastructure that is the product.
> Allows him to freely release open source models, because he has all of the rest of the pieces of user facing scaffolding already done.

An actual AGI
> where the a small model learns and accompanies the user for long periods
> while maintaining its own state
> with a constitution of what it can or cannot do
> rather than frequent updates from a central server
> would be detrimental to Meta’s business,
> would cause a re-evaluation of what they are doing

C) Summary
Zuck
> essentially settled into the trap of believing in incrementalism
> Advised by the smartest people in the world.
> Technically competent
> But he does not believe in states of the world where a 100x improvement from GPT-4 are possible, or that AGI is possible within a short timeframe.
> But he's also… he’s not raising capital.

The three people who are raising capital: Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Dario Amodei, are all on record expecting dramatic increases in capability. They could be hyping because they need higher valuations. I don’t know.

And so again we wait for GPT-5. If it is 10-100x as good as GPT-4, the current benchmarks won’t even work (how does one measure 100x as good on an MMLU scale of 1-100 ?).

If the models deliver value, and deliver large amounts of value exceeding manifold the capital deployed to develop them, then progress will continue. If not, not.

For me, the most exciting part of all of this is.. 🍿🍿🍿 drama. You get to see who is bluffing, with billions of dollars on the line, on a fairly short timeframe. And I, for the most part, am in it for sheer entertainment value in spectating potentially the greatest game mankind has ever played.

Happy Friday 🥂

I’d like to congratulate Dwarkesh for an excellent interview… and for not great ad reads as well 😜

The above was excerpted from my daily AI newsletter, full edition goes out Monday.

Sign up below!x.aiImage
Read 21 tweets
Mar 24, 2024
🇺🇸 Image
Image
Image
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(