New paper: shows how a low-carb diet could be a viable, affordable option for the US Dietary Guidelines.
USDA needs a low-carb option, because its current 3 "dietary patterns" are 52-56% of calories as carbs.
What would a low-carb option look like? 🧵 frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
--Far fewer grains. Grains just turn to sugar in the body
--No refined grains (duh)
--Far less dairy (this surprised me)
--Much more protein (the current amount in the guidelines is a bare minimum but not enough for kids, elderly and other groups)
More veggies!
--A lot more green, red and orange vegetables
--More beans, peas and lentils (? bc carb-rich)
--Fewer starchy vegetables. Starch --> sugar in the body
Shocker for me was increase in oils, but I guess these authors are not taking on the saturated-fat issue. Added fat should be natural fats, like butter, tallow, etc, which unlike oils, don't oxidize or cause inflammation.
Study funded by Simply Good Foods (formerly Atkins)
Paper has health disparities data. Eg: In 2017– 2018, prevalence of optimal metabolic health was... 38% lower in Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic White adults.
Also, black and Hispanic Americans make up more than 75% of overweight and obese Americans
Cost data:
In last 50y, federal healthcare spending has risen from 5 to 28% of the federal budget.
U.S. business (inflation-adjusted) spending on health care inc'd from $79 to $1,180 billion.
>1/2 of total federal healthcare spending is for treating diet-related diseases in 2018
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The American Heart Assn (AHA). just came out with a diet-rating list that tanks low-carb/keto due to saturated fat. Why is the AHA the last to get the news that these fats don't cause heart disease? 1/ nbcnews.com/health/heart-h…
This authoritative "State of the Art Review" in a top journal written by authors including 5 former members of the US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees concluded there should be no more caps on saturated fats. Evidence does not support it. doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc…
Here's a summary of 22 review papers, the vast majority of which conclude saturated fats are not a factor in poor heart disease outcomes.
AHA paper is an outlier--bc it ignores the more definitive "hard outcome" data on cardiovascular and total mortality. scribd.com/document/64120…
Is the next generation of MDs getting smarter about food for health?
An informal poll of med students at Harvard, Yale, Tufts, others (# students=41) is encouraging.
Poll organizer-a student who read ⬇️ thread
(chart is not a joke). Poll results-this 🧵
2. Above chart is data from "Food Compass," a food profiling system developed by Dean of Tufts School of Nutrition
Poll Q: What's healthier--Reeses Puffs or an egg?
-Students-->100% say eggs
-Food Compass-->Reeses Puffs scores 71 vs. 54 for cooked egg (100 is perfect score)
3. Poll Q: What's healthier?
Chocolate almonds or turkey breast?
Students--> 100% say turkey breast
Food Compass-->Chocolate almonds scores 78 vs. 55 for turkey breast
Go students!
Makers of Froot Loops, Lucky Charms sue FDA to give their cereals "healthy" label. Says corporate 'free speech' is deprived if they can't tell you sugar is good for you.
“Sugar plays a role in foods beyond palatability... 1/ theintercept.com/2023/03/01/fda…
...[sugar] it controls water activity, creates texture, adds bulk, and also contributes to flavor complexity,” says company brief.
What next?! Eat your "healthy" Hershey's bar?
These companies are shameless.
Thanks to @lhfang for reporting this
Companies suing FDA--General Mills, Post, Kellogg's--are same ones that got Dean of Tufts Nutrition to rank 100 of their cereals as healthier than an egg.
That Dean is also an advisor to White House, Congress. Corporate capture.
This tweet--1.6M views
Harvard advises mostly plant-based diets for longevity even tho the diet lacks essential nutrients like B12. Could not have even been an option until supplements were invented in mid-1900s. And how come some longest-living people daily ate bacon & eggs? 1/ mindbodygreen.com/articles/harva…
My latest: "A short history of saturated fat: the making and unmaking of a scientific consensus"
Do saturated fats cause heart disease? The science was always weak. Fear of these fats was started by American Heart Assoc. in 1961 based on a flawed study🧵 journals.lww.com/co-endocrinolo…
2. At the time, Heart Assoc had a major undisclosed conflict of interest: it had basically been launched by funding ($20M in today's dollars) from Procter & Gamble, maker of Crisco Oil
Heart Assoc then promoted veg. oils by selling them as "heart healthy," safer than sat fats
3. Despite Heart Assoc advice, he original "core" clinical trials on saturated fats, from the 60s and 70s, could not find an effect of these fats on cardiovascular mortality, total mortality, and for the most part heart attacks or other 'events.'
Quite a bit of #misinformation in this article on protein by the @washpost with Walter Willett, an anti-meat activist who has been saying "no amount of meat" is best since 1990. Why are his biases not disclosed? washingtonpost.com/wellness/2022/… 1/
Willett has been richly funded by food industries that benefit from elimination of meat. HIs bias against meat goes back 30y at least and is reflected in his many papers on meat + related topics. His views do not reflect prevailing science on protein. 2/ scribd.com/document/39760…
On saturated fat, eg, there are 20+ systematic reviews on clinical trials (highest quality data) concluding there's insufficient evidence to show effect of these fats on heart disease, despite extensive trials on 75K people. Most authoritative paper here: jacc.org/doi/abs/10.101…