How Leftists do a coup, so maybe people can learn to see it, stop it, and counter it.
Aside from all the usual linguistic and policy tricks, they apply Alinsky sequentially and strategically. The Left picks strategic individuals as targets and makes scapegoats of them.
They hold up an individual person on their most significant weaknesses, usually exaggerated, decontextualized, or even fabricated, and make them a symbol of something "inclusive" society has to purge. A two-minutes-hate campaign follows. Shame is heaped on. Disaster looms.
That's not all. They pick one target and media hate-bomb the hell out of them until they're infamous, but the target isn't the target. It's always something bigger and institutional. While the scramble is on over the first target, they start another campaign against a second one.
They usually have campaigns and oppo stacked and prepared 4-6 targets deep, with that spanning about three months. The attacks are relentless, strategic, and hit in waves that dissolve the foundations of the target institutions. Conservatives and normals usually have no defense.
See, this is how Leftists do a coup, though, so don't think you can do it back to them easily. Expect they know how to resist it. They do. It's actually easy, unless you're an honest person or care about being seen as one. All it takes is: Have no shame, ignore attacks, do DARVO.
For reference, DARVO means "Deny, Attack, Reverse the roles of Victim and Offender." It's standard narcissistic abuse tactics and involves gaslighting, twisting meanings, crybullying, and other symptoms of psychopathy. newdiscourses.com/2023/03/darvo/
Republicans can't launch these attacks, typically, because the Left can resist them. They also cannot resist them, generally. Why? They have shame, they always take up the content of the attacks and attack their colleagues, and they don't plan to attacks or counterattacks.
If you hit a Leftist with a normal accusation, they just ignore it completely. If you hit them with a damning one, they just move them somewhere else and let conservatives pretend they got a scalp. If they hit people with accusations, the attacks stick and burn like info napalm.
So that's how Leftists do a coup, picking off a series of strategic targets that make institutions fold. It's also why they're resistant to a similarly designed counter-coup, if one could even be organized. Tactically, this all needs to be understood to defend and counter.
Currently, state legislatures in conservative-majority states are getting sequentially hit with these attacks (Tennessee and Montana stand out at the moment) because opportunity arose. The model applies in macro to institutions and micro to individuals. We have to plan for it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"There will be blood on your hands if you don't give us our way" is a self-harm-based hostage-taking tactic. The dynamic (not the argument) should be named and refuted every time. After you name the dynamic, you can give argument, censor, etc. Plan for this playbook.
Maybe you shouldn't ask me about what to do with this extortion. My reply to "trans kids will kill themselves if you don't do what we want" would be "ok, that's sad, and we should try to prevent it by institutionalizing them. You're extorting us with that claim."
The United Nations is helping to bring the revolution to every facet of every person's life. unssc.org/courses/divers…
Doesn't this look good and important. The 2030 Agenda (not a conspiracy theory) requires "cultural sensitivity," which it calls "inclusivity" and encodes into seven of the seventeen Agenda Goals.
The goals of the reeducation are exactly what you would expect. Shut up, listen, global mindset, etc.
The World Economic Forum is subtly explaining how it's Neo-Communist in a new agenda article claiming everyone wants to meet Agenda 2030 but more "civic participation" is needed to accomplish it.
Executive summary suggests Agenda 2030 is supported unanimously (can we stop pretending it's a conspiracy theory yet?), that attacks on what it calls "civil society" and "civic freedoms" are a roadblock, and that freedom means freedom from fear and want. 🚩🚩🚩
In the first paragraph, we get a look behind the curtain. Whatever they mean by "civil society" and "civic freedoms" has everything to do with "economic inequality, gender imbalances, corruption, and environmental degradation." 🚩🚩🚩
They're Neo-Communists.
"According to you" is a powerful tool against the Woke.
"That's racist!" "According to you."
"That's transphobic!" "According to you."
"We need an inclusive space!" "According to you on your definitions."
Words are cheap in meaning under Woke. This cuts through that.
When a Woke accuses you of transphobia, you take for granted transphobia is a thing with a solid, stable meaning. They've got you. It doesn't have a solid stable meaning. You argue about what is, but the game is all wordplay.
"You're transphobic!" "According to you."
Woke ideology views language and reality (since language describes reality) as wholly subjective, with themselves providing the one true link between the subjective and objective. That means their words have subjective meanings. You don't have to accept them.
The real looming problem we're not looking at in education (largely because we're chasing school choice and putting out a million fires) is the incoming competency-based model that will make the entire current approach obsolete, but it's a social credit system.
Competencies will replace grades, transcripts, test scores, etc. We already see the move away from all those things in colleges and universities, and it will extend into hiring and possibly even civic participation. Some competencies will be academic and relevant, but not all.
Competency areas to be assessed and to award digital passport-like merit will be academic, social, emotional, behavioral, and all geared towards sustainability, inclusivity, equity, and global citizenship as defined by the central stakeholder councils (global Soviet).