Starship is about to change the world, but ppl haven't realized yet
@SpaceX and @elonmusk's rocket will drop transportation costs to space
And in the past, every drop in transportation costs has revolutionized the world.
Here's what's going to happen:
The # of objects launched to space has exploded in the last few years
This is, of course, the revolution brought by SpaceX's rockets.
We can now make this happen because the cost of sending payload to space has dropped
In the 80s, it cost over $75k to carry one kg to space. Just carrying one astronaut’s body cost over $5M! SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy has brought it down to $1,500/kg
50x cheaper!
Starship will eventually reduce it one order of magnitude more, and bring the cost from $1500 to $100 in a few years
Why does this matter? Because transportation costs are one of the biggest predictors of wealth.
Look at rivers. It’s no coincidence that the US and Northern Europe:
• Are among the wealthiest regions
• Have among the highest density of connected navigable inland waterways
Why? Water transportation is dirt cheap, either on sea or river
Navigable rivers are especially great:
• They serve 2 shores
• Calmer, more predictable
• Transport tons downstream with the current
• Or upstream with horses dragging a boat
Why are transportation costs so important?
Here's the magic:
Imagine that your transportation costs limit the distance you can trade your products
Now halve that cost, and your trade distance doubles
Which means that the *surface* QUADRUPLES, so you can access 4x more markets
But because of network effects, connecting 4x more nodes creates 16x more value!
More markets and lower costs
➡️more trade and more profits
➡️more wealth generated
➡️more investment in infrastructure
➡️even more trade and profits
• Romans: sailing in the Mediterranean + roads
• Portuguese: ocean navigation
• Northern Europe: rivers & canals
• Railroads: Industrial Revolution, conquest of the west
• Elevators: vertical transportation to grow cities upwards
Cars, airplanes... unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/transportati…
It's no coincidence that the biggest cities are transportation hubs. Eg:
• NY: Great Lakes + Atlantic
• New Orleans: Mississippi + Atlantic
• Chicago: Great Lakes + Mississippi
The UK's Industrial Revolution was impossible without cheap transportation:
Fodder➡️Cheap horse power
They pulled coal & iron ore on rails + canals➡️Cheaper iron & coal than anywhere on Earth
Even cheaper when the steam engine replaced horses
Now SpaceX is doing it again, this time with a new frontier: space
Starship is like the Portuguese caravel, reaching places inaccessible before
Like the horses+rails+canals of 1800s UK
Space engineers have spent decades focusing on shaving milligrams off their satellites. The weight was so important that it pervaded every decision: cost structure, volumes to be sent, material choices, power sources, thermal protection, software for guidance, navigation…
Every aspect of the mission was obsessed about one thing: weight. Every NASA mission had to be a marvel of miniaturization. The obsession against mass was drilled into engineers’ brains, generation after generation.
This is the way to understand the Tesla that @elonmusk sent to space.
It was not just a cool thing to do to raise awareness
It was a message to the industry:
"The time to worry about weight is gone. My rockets are so big that I can afford to send a Tesla and barely notice."
That is also what Starlink is
Suddenly, SpaceX has flooded the market with available cargo space. But ppl don't know how to use it
So SpaceX use it themselves:
"What's a massive business that was not possible before cheap payload? Cheap, reliable satellite communication."
A vast number of new businesses that were impossible before are now possible. The most obvious one is real time, detailed imagery of everything:
Climate
Crime
Poaching
War
Agriculture
Traffic mgmt
A Moon base is now within reach, if NASA refocuses the Artemis mission around Starship cargo space
No need for space machinery built for space from the ground up!
Retrofit @JohnDeere excavators or @CaterpillarInc trucks for space use
Other uses are also within our reach:
• Much more, cheaper space research
• Microgravity manufacturing
• Space tourism
Thanks to Starship, a new Age of Discoveries dawns upon us
The only limit is our imagination
I respect @BillAckman a lot but I think he's wrong on @Uber. AFAIK his bear case on robotaxis: 1. Not great for bad weather 2. Too expensive to cover peak demand 3. Less utilization because of food delivery 4. They can't disintermediate Uber
1. Not great for bad weather
This is a @Waymo driving in rain—the worst they'll ever be! They already have ~10x fewer accidents than humans. Maybe in the short term humans are going to be better in some really bad weather, but those are short-term exceptions
2. Robotaxis will be too expensive to cover peak demand
This is ptrobably true for Waymo but not @Tesla's @robotaxi, for 2 reasons:
a. Cybercab costs will be the same order of magnitude as normal ICE cars
The Model 3 costs ~$40-$45k, but the Cybercab will have 60% fewer parts: steering wheel, pedals, steering column, backseats, backdoors, side-window mirrors, rear window... Let's assume this will bring the cost down to $30-$35k
Add to that the new manufacturing process that treats Tesla's Cybercabs not as cars, but as electronics. They will be able to produce a car every 5s. This will further reduce their price
Compare that to the price of a car for Uber, which today is between $25k-$60k
Never bet against the US:
Ppl think its biggest strength is its institutions, the dollar, entrepreneurship... But one of its biggest assets is its geography 🧵
1. Size
The US is the 4th largest country. It spans an entire continent, reaches two oceans, and is big enough to be a geographic heavyweight in the world
2. The Mississippi Basin
It's the 4th largest drainage basin in the world and occupies 40% of the contiguous 48 US states, touching 32 of the US’s 50 states. 11 US states directly take their name from it.
Climate caused the US Civil War, because: 1. Slavery was the main cause of the war 2. Different crops were the main cause of slavery 3. Climate caused different crops in the North vs South
This is terribly important to understand the US today and how to heal it
🧵
1. Slavery was the main cause of the war: the Abolitionist North & the Slavery South were competing to expand westward to increase their political influence
But the North grew & expanded faster, to a point where it could force abolition on the South, which then seceded
In 1790, the Free & Slave states had the same population, and there were many more Slave States (8 vs 5), so Slave States controlled the Senate.
By the eve of the war in 1860, the North had 50% more population and 4 more states, giving them control of both the House & Senate
Moscow is one of the weirdest capitals:
• Biggest European city
• Extremely cold
• Little farmland
• To Russia's extreme west
• Not on a coast or main river
How did it create the biggest country on Earth?
It involves horse archers, human harvesting & tiny animals 🧵
The first shocking fact is that Russia is so far north it's at the edge of arable land. How can you create a capital with so little food? Why not in the middle of the most fertile area on Earth?
This far north is extremely cold
Moscow is the 3rd coldest capital in the world and by far the biggest: with 20M ppl, its metro population is 8x bigger than the 2nd biggest cold capital, Stockholm!
This map tells you how a seemingly innocent difference, like wheat vs rice eating, can have dramatic political, economic, and cultural ramifications:
🧵
The areas that harvest wheat vs rice are different. Why?
Because of climate
Rice needs heat and lots of water. Ideally, flooding the fields to also kill weeds. Rice dies with frost.
Wheat resists it well, prefers cooler temperatures, but dies when it's flooded
Did you know the West's trade deficits to China are not recent, but started 2000 years ago? This is the story of how silk, porcelain, tea, opium, and silver have determined the history of the world 🧵
The Romans already complained about deficits to China! Mainly because of silk
Back then the Chinese already preferred manufacturing and selling products than consuming foreign products. Chronicler Solinus ~200 AD: The Chinese "prefer only to sell their products, but do not like to buy our goods."