Starship is about to change the world, but ppl haven't realized yet
@SpaceX and @elonmusk's rocket will drop transportation costs to space
And in the past, every drop in transportation costs has revolutionized the world.
Here's what's going to happen:
The # of objects launched to space has exploded in the last few years
This is, of course, the revolution brought by SpaceX's rockets.
We can now make this happen because the cost of sending payload to space has dropped
In the 80s, it cost over $75k to carry one kg to space. Just carrying one astronaut’s body cost over $5M! SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy has brought it down to $1,500/kg
50x cheaper!
Starship will eventually reduce it one order of magnitude more, and bring the cost from $1500 to $100 in a few years
Why does this matter? Because transportation costs are one of the biggest predictors of wealth.
Look at rivers. It’s no coincidence that the US and Northern Europe:
• Are among the wealthiest regions
• Have among the highest density of connected navigable inland waterways
Why? Water transportation is dirt cheap, either on sea or river
Navigable rivers are especially great:
• They serve 2 shores
• Calmer, more predictable
• Transport tons downstream with the current
• Or upstream with horses dragging a boat
Why are transportation costs so important?
Here's the magic:
Imagine that your transportation costs limit the distance you can trade your products
Now halve that cost, and your trade distance doubles
Which means that the *surface* QUADRUPLES, so you can access 4x more markets
But because of network effects, connecting 4x more nodes creates 16x more value!
More markets and lower costs
➡️more trade and more profits
➡️more wealth generated
➡️more investment in infrastructure
➡️even more trade and profits
• Romans: sailing in the Mediterranean + roads
• Portuguese: ocean navigation
• Northern Europe: rivers & canals
• Railroads: Industrial Revolution, conquest of the west
• Elevators: vertical transportation to grow cities upwards
Cars, airplanes... unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/transportati…
It's no coincidence that the biggest cities are transportation hubs. Eg:
• NY: Great Lakes + Atlantic
• New Orleans: Mississippi + Atlantic
• Chicago: Great Lakes + Mississippi
The UK's Industrial Revolution was impossible without cheap transportation:
Fodder➡️Cheap horse power
They pulled coal & iron ore on rails + canals➡️Cheaper iron & coal than anywhere on Earth
Even cheaper when the steam engine replaced horses
Now SpaceX is doing it again, this time with a new frontier: space
Starship is like the Portuguese caravel, reaching places inaccessible before
Like the horses+rails+canals of 1800s UK
Space engineers have spent decades focusing on shaving milligrams off their satellites. The weight was so important that it pervaded every decision: cost structure, volumes to be sent, material choices, power sources, thermal protection, software for guidance, navigation…
Every aspect of the mission was obsessed about one thing: weight. Every NASA mission had to be a marvel of miniaturization. The obsession against mass was drilled into engineers’ brains, generation after generation.
This is the way to understand the Tesla that @elonmusk sent to space.
It was not just a cool thing to do to raise awareness
It was a message to the industry:
"The time to worry about weight is gone. My rockets are so big that I can afford to send a Tesla and barely notice."
That is also what Starlink is
Suddenly, SpaceX has flooded the market with available cargo space. But ppl don't know how to use it
So SpaceX use it themselves:
"What's a massive business that was not possible before cheap payload? Cheap, reliable satellite communication."
A vast number of new businesses that were impossible before are now possible. The most obvious one is real time, detailed imagery of everything:
Climate
Crime
Poaching
War
Agriculture
Traffic mgmt
A Moon base is now within reach, if NASA refocuses the Artemis mission around Starship cargo space
No need for space machinery built for space from the ground up!
Retrofit @JohnDeere excavators or @CaterpillarInc trucks for space use
Other uses are also within our reach:
• Much more, cheaper space research
• Microgravity manufacturing
• Space tourism
Thanks to Starship, a new Age of Discoveries dawns upon us
The only limit is our imagination
Then, a series of MEGAFLOODS filled it in a matter of months
How did the Med dry up?
Why did it fill so brutally?
How would it have felt to be there?
This is what we know:
The African and European tectonic plates have been colliding for millions of years, forming the mountains of southern Europe
About 6M ago, water still poured into the Med from the Atlantic, but not through Gibraltar. Through what is now the Guadalquivir Valley
Fun fact: this flow helped form the Guadalquivir River valley, open to the Atlantic, so good for navigation that it was the base for the Spanish colonization of America. This is why American Spanish sounds like the dialect from this region. Details:
The AI debate focuses on risk, but what about its potential?
AI can eliminate most misery because it can eliminate all material scarcity.
Let's take an example: Food is scarce. Why? Where does food come from?
• Land, for growing, grazing, supermarkets...
• Raw materials, like fertilizer
• Machinery, like tractors or threshers
• Energy, like the Sun or oil for the tractor
• Transport, to get the food to the market
• Human workers to make all of this happen
But transport is just machines (trucks) with energy (oil, electricity) and workers (drivers, operators). One down.
And machines are just raw materials, energy, and human work. Let's take a car:
Why is New York so big?
Why the biggest metropolis in the US?
Why are other East Coast cities smaller, like Philadelphia, Boston, or even Québec and Montréal?
Because of holes in the mountains and competition with the UK:
In a previous thread, I explained why Chicago is so big: It's the connection between the Mississippi and Great Lakes regions.
But these regions need to connect to the sea
The connection to the south is New Orleans, but that's far away
The problem is the Appalachians. It's a huge barrier across the continent.
We're in the early 1800s. The newborn US is full of vitality. It wants to bypass these mountains. How should they do it?
Through the easiest path: the flattest.
The Texas Triangle , between Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio, contains 75% of Texans.
Why?
What's special about that triangle?
A map of night lights shows that ppl are concentrated in its tips and edge:
• One of its tips is the massive Houston
• Another tip is an uncommon type of city: the couple Dallas–Fort Worth
• Then there's a line of cities between Dallas and San Antonio w/ Austin, Waco...
Why?
What can the satellite tell us?
If you look carefully, you can see a green and grey line running from San Antonio to Dallas. What is it?
Why is LA California's biggest city?
Why is the state's capital Sacramento, only the 7th biggest city?
Why is SF so important despite being on hills?
Why did San Jose pass it in population?
What's the role of the Central Valley?
How to understand California:
Los Angeles is more than 2x more populous than the SF Bay Area, which in turn is more than 2x San Diego's. Sacramento is the 4th metropolitan area and 7th city by population.
So why is it the capital?
This was not the population distribution 170 years ago, when California became a US state.
If you look at the most populous counties then, you might not even recognize 3 of the top 5. Why?