Elliot Swartz Profile picture
Apr 27 21 tweets 8 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Didn't have time to read the 150 pages of new information associated with @GOODMeat's FDA pre-market consultation for cultivated chicken?

Key info in this thread.

npr.org/sections/healt…
Let's start with the conclusion. The FDA states, "foods comprised of, or containing, cultured chicken cell material resulting from the production process defined in CCC 000001 are as safe as comparable foods produced by other methods."

So how is it made?
Cells: The cells used for production are a publicly available cell line known as DF-1, which has been in the ATCC cell bank since 1996. The cell line is a chicken fibroblast line obtained from 10 day old embryonic chicken tissue.

This was unexpected!
Cells: The cells were confirmed to be of chicken origin based on PCR to the mitochondrial genome. The cells are not engineered or genetically modified. The cell line was spontaneously immortalized and considered genetically stable (12-14% of cells measured were polyploid).
Cells: The cells fail on two measures of tumorigenicity. They fail to grow in soft agar & fail to grow into tumors when injected into live chickens (these experiments were performed by the original cell line developers).

Thus, you're not "eating cancer."
Process: Cells are cultured in 1000L bioreactors. No scaffolds are used to make the product. No differentiation step.

GOOD Meat currently uses a contract manufacturer JOINN Biologics (joinnbio.com) to make their product.

This was also somewhat of a surprise. Image
Media: Cells are grown in a media that does not contain any antibiotics.

This is consistent w/ our expectations for the industry. Decoupling meat production from antibiotics is a huge benefit of #cultivatedmeat.
gfi.org/blog/cultivati…
Media: The media contains FBS. Using serum albumin as a proxy, only a trace amount of serum is left after washing the product (in a salt solution).

Bovine serum albumin is present at concentrations ~12x lower than that found in milk. This was thus deemed safe for consumption.
Media: But I've been told companies have found alternatives to serum!

They have. @GOODMeat filed an amendment, which was approved, for serum-free media production in Singapore earlier this year. A similar process will take place in the United States.

techcrunch.com/2023/01/18/goo…
Safety: Batches of end product were tested for a variety of pathogens, including human and avian viruses & common foodborne contaminants such as E. coli and Salmonella. All negative.

Note how often chicken at your local grocery store tests positive for these contaminants. ImageImageImage
Product: The cultivated chicken cells are intended to be used as an ingredient in a variety of products at 60-75% (w/w).

Shown here are proximates & heavy metals. Heavy metals are notably much lower than safe specifications. Image
Nutrition: Overall protein and fat content when normalized on a dry weight basis is similar to conventional chicken breast.

High ash content is due to residual salts from salt wash steps. Image
Nutrition: Amino acid & fats data.

The firm states overall amino acid content is reduced but the proportion is ~same. (Is this because the cells are not actual skeletal muscle)? FDA says fat content is broadly similar.

Cholesterol (122 mg/100g) is ~same as conventional chicken. ImageImage
Nutrition: Full vitamin and mineral content is not provided. But some were measured to establish safety of their upstream inputs in the media. Those included iron and folate levels. ImageImage
Stability: They tested stability based on composition and oxidative state w/ product frozen over 6 months. No significant changes were noted. Image
Allergens: No common allergens, including those found in chicken eggs, were expressed in the final product. As noted previously, low levels of bovine serum albumin are present due to the use of serum in the production process (for now). Image
Product: Below is an example certificate of analysis and proposed label. ImageImage
What are the next steps?

Before being sold, GOOD Meat must obtain a USDA grant of inspection, where the facility will be overseen similarly to other meat & poultry facilities. USDA will also make labeling decisions.

See here for full details:
gfi.org/resource/fda-c…
See this thread for an overview of the other completed FDA pre-market consultation to date (also of cultivated chicken).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elliot Swartz

Elliot Swartz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @elliotswartz

Feb 14
Some thoughts on (1) whether immortalized cells for #cultivatedmeat production should be compared to eating cancer (2) whether consuming them would give you cancer & (3) whether long-term studies are needed to ensure the safety of cultivated meat...

bloomberg.com/news/features/…
(1) The article says immortalized cells are precancerous or in some cases cancerous

There are 6 hallmarks of cancer, immortality is 1 of them. Having 1 feature of a complex phenotype doesn't mean it is that type.

You can't equate immortality to cancer.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hallm…
(1) Thus, while all cancers are immortalized, not all immortalized cells are cancer. Sorta like how not all rectangles are squares.

To become cancer, a transformation involving the loss of control in various aspects of cell growth & regulation is one event that occurs.
Read 25 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
The most comprehensive study to date of #cultivatedmeat production was just published, led by scientists from @believermeats

Much of the data in this paper will likely make up their safety dossier for regulatory approval in the US

What did we learn? 👇

nature.com/articles/s4301…
For context, @believermeats is the 2nd most capitalized #cultivatedmeat company, having raised nearly $400M to date

They recently broke ground on a large production facility in N. Carolina

Cell lines: The company isolated fibroblasts from fertilized chicken embryos from 2 breeds (broiler Ross 308 and Israeli Baladi chickens).

Over time, the fibroblasts spontaneously immortalized, w/ stabilized doubling times of ~20 hrs. Image
Read 28 tweets
Nov 28, 2022
It's been almost 2 weeks since the historic announcement of FDA's green light for cultivated chicken from @upsidefoods. This coincided with over 100 pages of new information related to the production and safety of #cultivatedmeat.

So what did we learn?

nytimes.com/2022/11/17/cli…
Let's start w/ the conclusion. The FDA "did not identify any properties of the cells as described that would render them different from other animal cells w/ respect to safety for food use."

Cells are cells, whether grown inside or outside the animal

Here's what was evaluated:
Cells: 2 cell lines were used. Myoblasts acquired from an adult chicken & fibroblasts acquired from a mid-stage fertilized egg.

The myoblast line was spontaneously immortalized. The fibroblast line was immortalized through genetic engineering (more on that later)
Read 27 tweets
Nov 30, 2021
I want to add some color to the key points of contention highlighted two months ago in The Counter article.

This will be the last I'll say on this for a while. Long 🧵!

thecounter.org/lab-grown-cult…
As mentioned in my perspective piece, despite how they are portrayed, the CE Delft & Humbird TEAs are actually quite similar in their high-level findings IMO.

gfi.org/blog/rational-…
TEAs suggest that CM production costs are high due to (1) current media costs, (2) current bioreactor costs, & (3) additional infrastructure costs needed to produce meaningful amounts of CM.

So let's talk about those.
Read 61 tweets
Jul 21, 2021
I think there's some confusion around a lack of #cultivatedmeat (CM)-relevant cell lines & the role of private industry vs. public funds in alleviating this issue. Conversation on this topic spurred by this recent article & below:

theguardian.com/science/2021/j…
Private industry has pioneered CM & brought concept to reality in <6 years. This has spurred investments into industry, which may be >$1B total by year end. This is good. We don't have time to waste in developing CM. We need urgency & investment to be matched by the public sector
Private industry success has driven academics & students toward CM. But they have few places to go to for funding. GFI's research grants program awards $ millions of grants each year, but we reject a growing # of great proposals each year (not enough $)
gfi.org/researchgrants/
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(