@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace "Because fathers usually provided the family’s sole income through their employment away from the home [during the Industrial Revolution], this absence advanced the fathers' 'long march from the center to the periphery of domestic life.'" 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. at 898 (1998).
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace “…[T]his system harms rather than nurtures paternal-child relationships in low-income families and contributes to poor men’s economic insecurity. The majority of men who do not comply with formal child support orders cannot afford to do so.” 102 Virginia Law Review 148.
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace "The …[federal Child Support Enforcement Amendments Act of 1984] legislation passed by Congress represented a …victory for women’s rights groups…. The law… did not tie child support responsibilities to reciprocal visitation and custody rights." 102 Virginia Law Review 138.
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace As outlined above, before labor-saving gizmos, men used to be awarded custody whenever the courts got involved and then the "tender years" doctrine came to be (which was advocated for by women) which led to sole custody being awarded to women and women getting child support.
Is it in society’s interests to fund the single-parent lifestyle choice women make? …or the force fathers to fund that lifestyle?
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace There was no child support prior to the 1800's. Child support didn't exist in America 🇺🇸 prior to 1839. The idea that women were responsible enough to independently parent started in 1839 (but women needed a man's financial help as women were seen as so irresponsible otherwise).
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace We have to allow the intentional killing of human life (through abortions) to prevent a significant percentage of the societal consequences of irresponsible parenting by single mothers (some of whom do not know who fathered their child) caused by their sexual irresponsibility.
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace Women have all the choices regarding parenthood. A woman can choose to be a parent if she finds a willing sperm donor. A man cannot choose to become a parent even if he finds a willing egg donor or a willing sex partner. She who has the womb has the choice of parenthood.
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace If a woman terminates the pregnancy, she terminates the possibility of parenthood. If she carries the pregnancy to term, she puts the responsibilities of parenthood on the father whether that male wants to be a parent or not and whether he consented to sex or impregnation or not.
@Scuba_On_Mars@BrassVon@JayHamiltonMAN@Oneiorosgrip@HeinerPara@musa_mylove@harmonizedgrace A 13-year-old boy can be raped by a 30-year-old woman, but if his rapist gets pregnant, (because women have all the choices regarding parenthood) the boy has to pay child support to her — as society deems a 13-year-old boy more fiscally responsible than a 30-year-old woman.
Women care for and help household members 2.08 more hours per day than men in the most extreme case presented by Table 8A, but men work 6.43 hours more per day than women.
Here is a thought to mull over. When people complain about “Capitalism” or the “Free Market” as such, it may not be capitalism or the free market that is the problem, but so-called “capitalists” (who are among the greatest enemies of capitalism or the free market).
(🧵: 1/7)
Capitalism or the free market are defined by perfect competition or as near to that as is possible. The problem that people are complaining about when they complain about “Capitalism” or the “Free Market” is imperfect competition.
(🧵: 2/7)
The so-called capitalists are really oligopsonists, oligopolists, monopsonists, or monopolists — or, worse of all, either oligopsonists-oligopolists or monopsonists-monopolists.
@davidhogg111 One problem: “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The word “people” suggests an individual right.
Maybe the professors you consulted had reading comprehension deficits of which you were unaware or agendas coloring their interpretation.
@davidhogg111 “The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause and its operative clause. The former does not limit the latter grammatically, but rather announces a purpose.”
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 577 (2008).
@davidhogg111 “The Amendment could be rephrased, ‘Because a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.’”
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 577 (2008).
If one wants programs like (the American🇺🇸) Social Security (Insurance) to function, one must necessarily be in favor of some flavor of pronatalist policies that produce workers with adequate work ethic.
This isn’t talked about near enough.
These workers need not be employees; self-employed and entrepreneurial individuals fund Social Security and similar social programs every bit as much as employees do — if they draw a wage or salary from their company or equivalent proprietorship earnings.
NOTE: Business owners drawing income from a business as an investment (rather than as wage, salary, or equivalent proprietorship earnings) doesn’t fund the Social Security Trust Fund.
@KenFarmerTV Not quite correct, but close. What really happened is even more infuriating.
Something to keep in mind: the American 🇺🇸 federal government and each of the 50 states have different terms and definitions for each prosecutable crime; thus, statisticians make their own definitions.
@KenFarmerTV To demonstrate what I am talking about hereinbelow is the federal rape statute I referenced earlier. Federal law uses "Sexual Abuse" rather than "Rape" as the term of art for the crime of rape (congress.gov/bill/99th-cong…) due to Senate Bill 1236 (in the 99th United States Congress).
@KenFarmerTV 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1): “Whoever … knowingly … causes another person to engage in a sexual act by threatening or placing that other person in fear ….”
@Mutant187@altongearheart@justman70446122@nitwittwit1@Michael_B_1970@Oneiorosgrip@BrassVon “On the day Sputnik first orbited the earth, the chief clerk of the Senate’s Education and Labor Committee, Stewart McClure, sent a memo to his chairman, Alabama Democrat Lister Hill, [suggesting] …if they called the education bill a defense bill they might get it enacted”(Id.).