1. Why did Twitter censor Tucker Carlson? Better yet, who helped Twitter do that? #TuckerTwitterFiles
2. While reading an endless sea of #TwitterFiles, one request to censor alleged "Covid misinformation" stood out: Tucker Carlson.
Tucker is now in the news after Fox announced his departure.
3. A Twitter employee emailed colleagues in June 2021 to inquire if a Tucker Carlson op-ed for @FoxNewsOpinion should be flagged for COVID-19 "misinformation."
4. Twitter then punished Tucker Carlson for this op-ed.
Tucker actually cited the World Health Organisation's own website which stated that the WHO was NOT recommending children get the COVID vax.
5. When I looked back at the WHO website, I found they stealth edited their page to remove this passage stating they did not recommend kids get vaccinated.
6. After Twitter began reviewing Tucker's op-ed for alleged COVID-19 misinformation, an employee emailed that they would take action by "labelling any tweets linking the article." #TwitterFiles
7. Twitter officials also discussed looping in top Twitter execs, such as the general counsel, due to the "political risks" associated with such actions.
Yoel Roth agreed with this approach to "escalate."
8. One employee chimed in to explain various options Twitter could take that would affect the op-eds reach, without directly censoring Fox. There were various choices.
9. Tucker Carlson would have never known this happened, but when Twitter held a meet and greet months, later, they wrote of Tucker's producer, "[I]t was pretty apparent from the get-go we understood the very different goals we have at work."
10. BTW, the Twitter official who first brought Tucker's article to attention came to Twitter from the office of Senator Chuck Schumer, a frequent Tucker critic.
11. Much thanks to @TexasLindsay_ who helped collect and organise #TwitterFiles. I love San Francisco, but we read and read, until our eyes bled.
1) I'm on vacay and have gotten several calls from Hill staff and Trump officials about this @emilyakopp "exclusive" that repeats old stories--some OTHERS broke.
One IC official told me, "There's nothing new. This is just sleazy."
Emily has done this numerous times before; let's review
@Dylan_Housman
@_EricLieberman_
@VinceCoglianese
@JohnCFLoftus1
@DailyCaller
@SenJoniErnst
@tuckercarlson
@robbysoave
@RisingTheHill
@CarlHigbie
@lizlyons47
@ianmSC
@paulsperry_
#KOPPyKAT
2) EXAMPLE 1
Emily Kopp "exclusive" first reported by @SharriMarkson
#KOPPyKAT
3) EXAMPLE 1
Sharri Markson broke this story a few months back in 2021.
1) NIH Director released new priorities for national research. I was leaked a copy of document. Follow along.
"To rebuild public trust, NIH is enhancing oversight of funded research abroad and reinforcing its commitment to responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars."
2) DEI and affirmative action are out and replication in research is in.
3) A strategic plan on AI is coming.
Lots more nutrition research, it appears, with focus on long term studies to ID good and bad diets, starting before birth.
Max Koslov and the #sciomm writers at @Nature continue putting out fake news and propaganda. Koslov's publisher Springer Nature won't say if they got a DOJ letter from @EagleEdMartin, but I published that letter to Springer Nature a month ago.
Koslov just can't do journalism.
2) Here's the letter DOJ sent to Springer Nature's journal Nature Medicine, which published the corrupt "Proximal Origin" paper.
1) Trump administration has pivoted to investigate the much ballyhooed "Proximal Origin" paper by @scrippsresearch Kristian Andersen.
Read DOJ's letter to @NatureMedicine. Trump officials believe the paper was a quid pro quo for a Fauci grant. tinyurl.com/ykr7vxpv
2) Suspicions have long dogged this study, as emails have found the authors ran it past funders Tony Fauci and Francis Collins at the NIH, as well as @JeremyFarrar when he was at the Wellcome Trust.
In one email, Kristian Andersen praised them for "advice and leadership."
3) When Nature Medicine published the paper, editor in chief Joaa Monteiro claimed the paper “put conspiracy theories” about the pandemic’s possible lab origin to rest.
Is labelling an alternative hypothesis a "conspiracy theory" normal in science?
1) @ScienceMagazine interviewed @NIHDirector_Jay and then pretended he lied to them in the interview, kicking of a storm on #Bluesky.
I'm releasing the entire interview and a transcript.
The behavior is appalling, not the first time Science has been caught in unethical acts.
2) @AshleyRindsberg released a story for @tabletmag w/ emails catching @sciencemagazine Jon Cohen in salacious behavior. tinyurl.com/yrtjp5dw
3) In this case, Science Magazine claimed in two stories that Bhattacharya dismissed a Nature article "that NIH planned to suspend subawards for foreign collaborators"