1. Why did Twitter censor Tucker Carlson? Better yet, who helped Twitter do that? #TuckerTwitterFiles
2. While reading an endless sea of #TwitterFiles, one request to censor alleged "Covid misinformation" stood out: Tucker Carlson.
Tucker is now in the news after Fox announced his departure.
3. A Twitter employee emailed colleagues in June 2021 to inquire if a Tucker Carlson op-ed for @FoxNewsOpinion should be flagged for COVID-19 "misinformation."
4. Twitter then punished Tucker Carlson for this op-ed.
Tucker actually cited the World Health Organisation's own website which stated that the WHO was NOT recommending children get the COVID vax.
5. When I looked back at the WHO website, I found they stealth edited their page to remove this passage stating they did not recommend kids get vaccinated.
6. After Twitter began reviewing Tucker's op-ed for alleged COVID-19 misinformation, an employee emailed that they would take action by "labelling any tweets linking the article." #TwitterFiles
7. Twitter officials also discussed looping in top Twitter execs, such as the general counsel, due to the "political risks" associated with such actions.
Yoel Roth agreed with this approach to "escalate."
8. One employee chimed in to explain various options Twitter could take that would affect the op-eds reach, without directly censoring Fox. There were various choices.
9. Tucker Carlson would have never known this happened, but when Twitter held a meet and greet months, later, they wrote of Tucker's producer, "[I]t was pretty apparent from the get-go we understood the very different goals we have at work."
10. BTW, the Twitter official who first brought Tucker's article to attention came to Twitter from the office of Senator Chuck Schumer, a frequent Tucker critic.
11. Much thanks to @TexasLindsay_ who helped collect and organise #TwitterFiles. I love San Francisco, but we read and read, until our eyes bled.
Last December, @elonmusk sent out his viral tweet about Fauci.
Fauci went on Fox News and said he had "no clue what [Elon] was talking about."
2) "A lot of people are spouting out a lot of things about me and Twitter," Fauci told @FoxNews. "I've never had a Twitter account. I don't intend on having a Twitter account, and I've had nothing to do with Twitter. So I don't know what they're talking about when they say that."
3) Fauci made similar claims, during multiple exchanges, in a 7-hour deposition, where he denied using Twitter or even knowing how to access a tweet.
1. Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci have destroyed trust.
When Collins was being confirmed to run NIH, he had to come through my Senate office. wsj.com/articles/resea…
2. When we met, I had already gotten 1 Institute Director fired and several academics forced from their jobs, and I had warned Elias Zerhouni that if he didn't clean up problems at the NIH, I was pivoting to focus on him.
"You tell me where to point the cannons."
3. Collins listened to me and nodded at all the right moments.
But Collins never knew I already had people in Building 1 telling me he didn't really care. He just wanted more money and for me to leave him the hell alone.
1. “Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science,” Anthony Fauci said, blasting his critics during a 2021 interview about his advice on the pandemic.
So the NY Times confronted Fauci w/ an unimpeachable source: Anthony Fauci.
Fauci has long stated he has an "open mind" about the pandemic's beginning, but the New York Times pointed out that Fauci dismissed a Wuhan lab accident as a "conspiracy theory" on a podcast in early 2020. nytimes.com/2023/03/28/opi…
3. If this sounds familiar to readers of @DisInfoChron, that’s because I uncovered this podcast and reported on it back in December.
Nonetheless, it’s great to see the New York Times catching up.
1. New email calls into question October Senate Interim Report & @propublica story parroting it. Critics say both ignored NIH funding for Wuhan research to protect lobbying gigs and biodefense "contract racket."
Follow the money to K Street lobbyists
2. FORMER CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATOR: October interim report made no mention of Anthony Fauci nor "gain-of-function research" and only passing reference to NIH. Why?
“You can’t trash the agency you need for lobbying contacts and contracts with, right?”
3. FORMER CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATOR: the multi-billion dollar biodefense system is a “contract racket” for virologists to find viruses ; bring them back to labs for research, including gain-of-function studies; and then partner with biomedical companies and Big pharma to create… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…