My piece covering the Clean Air Forum is finally out in The Saturday Paper!
I explore how clean indoor air has been an issue long before the pandemic, which "cost Australia more than $12 billion a year due to ill health and lost productivity."
CMO Paul Kelly set the forum a challenge, and it was taken up by "experts in fields ranging from medicine to architecture, engineering and occupational health and safety [who] gathered with politicians at Parliament House."
In his essay on "values-based capitalism", @JEChalmers critiqued Frydenberg for failing to learn “the key lesson of the pandemic: healthy economies rely on healthy people and communities” and wrote that we must "build something better."
A clean air revolution would do just that!
In the article, I offer "three overarching and cost-effective solutions are relatively low-hanging fruit" that were discussed at the Clean Air Forum.
1) Use and adapt existing OHS frameworks/building regs 2) Measure and publicly display Co2 3) Fix and retrofit buildings
As I discuss, there are many benefits to good Indoor Air Quality (IAQ):
1) Reduces illness & allergies 2) Cuts hospitalisations 3) Saves $$ 4) Improved concentration and learning 5) Increased productivity 6) Less absenteeism 7) Creates jobs 8) Can increase energy efficiency
As @DrPieterPeach declared at the forum, “there is no excuse for poorly ventilated spaces in Australia”, and there is little evidence giving us reason not to do this.
I conclude that:
"The 'gas-fired recovery' promised by the Morrison government must be replaced by a clean-air revolution that aligns far better with Australia’s broader transition to clean energy and to our self-actualisation as a 'nation of innovators'."
The media, policymakers and experts - what Gramsci referred to as the "organs of public opinion" - will "help" us get to this wonderful (eugenicist) reality by creating a "frame shift" and "behaviour changes" 🙃🙃🙃🙃
My latest in The Canberra Times, in which I theorise "COVID Hegemony" to explain the transformation of our pandemic outlook:
"Living with COVID has now become hegemonic, in Gramsci's terms, not just in Australia but in many countries around the world." canberratimes.com.au/story/8039208/…
What is "hegemony"? I draw from Gramsci, who "proposed that those who hold power could ensure that their preferred worldview would be seen as natural, inevitable and beneficial to all by creating and maintaining what he termed cultural hegemony."
Those with power achieve hegemony "not by force, but by coercive persuasion. That is, by gaining popular acceptance, even approval of their moral and political values."
A quick 🧵about Morrison's callous and ableist "blessed" comment.
First of all, I'm not shocked at all by his comment, mostly because of his actions in recent years. But also because of his beliefs, clearly demonstrated during the pandemic.
At the start of the year, I wrote about how Morrison's pentecostal faith and neoliberal ideology was disastrous for Australia's COVID-19 response. I concluded that it "caused further harm while deflecting responsibility away from government." canberratimes.com.au/story/7600746/…
Neoliberal ideology argues for the deterioration of public services, such as healthcare, and a devotion to the private market, especially to deal with issues (if you can personally pay for it). Unsurprisingly, neoliberalism devalues and disadvantages disabled people.
There has been a lot of talk that what's happening in Parliament wouldn't be accepted at any other workplace - yet sexual harassment and assault is sadly relatively common in workplaces around Australia.
A recent survey found that 2 in 5 women have reported experiencing workplace sexual harassment in the last 5 years. abc.net.au/news/2021-03-0…
And the responses to those who've reported their experiences have been woeful. 19% were labelled as a troublemaker, 18% were ostracised, victimised or ignored by colleagues and 17% resigned.