Chief censor in Australia. Seems American. Worked in DC, then for US tech: Microsoft, Adobe, pre-Musk Twitter. WEF member.
Appointed by the center right Aus govt, reappointed by the leftist govt. Now censors journalists who correctly gender trans activists.
Globalist elites are steering this ship and neither major party is going to change its course.
Their targets don't make sense in the usual political terms. They are trying to suppress anyone who promotes normal gender roles and even normal beauty standards.
It's next-level insanity. And I don't believe the "cathedral/emergent" stuff can explain it.
But Occidentals are too weak and meek to fight back. Demons are in charge, hope you enjoy the ride.
The left and right both hate the free wins that come from tech. That's because both want rewards to depend on moral virtue--they just disagree on what virtues should be rewarded.
There's a better way. Tech up to create abundance that ISN'T dependent on virtue.
Everybody wins.
Within a year it will be clear whether anti-obesity drugs really live up to their promise. For now I think we should hope for the best!
Choose the NOSE you prefer, NOT the face you prefer!
This poll was requested by a reader.
I suspect the result will be skewed by the faces. I'd like to run it again with more nose options on identical faces (using AI images). Unfortunately my usual AI-image guy is busy. If you'd like to help with this project let me know!
My beauty article has been posted on Reddit's Vindicta forum again. Last time this happened it was deleted after 100 negative comments.
I doubt anyone there is aware of my Twitter but just in case I'll address the most common criticism: that it "relies too much on sex dolls."
In my view this is a dishonest complaint made by people who can't yet bring themselves to accept the truth, because it's a criticism that's already addressed very thoroughly in the article itself. For instance, in the image above.
The purpose of my article is to show men's beauty preferences independent of their habitually dishonest public claims. I cite a wide-ranging collection of evidence that includes everything from ancient love goddesses to internet search results. Sex dolls are just one example.