1/10 I just realized that the US Gov has to PAY to prop-up the USD in the CURRENT BUDGET through Quasi Fiscal Deficit.

Let's explain the Druck USD short. 🧵
Because QFD is your chickens coming to roost right there.
2/10 There WERE two timelines. The thing you pay now, the thing you owe in the future. Petrodollars and expansion of #TSY in foreign central banks.
3/10 In 2000 the monetary base is small, the US gov debt is a lot more reasonable. The currency is propped up by petrodollar. Any means of circulation acquires its value in use and non redeemable gov currency the most.
4/10 In 2000 what US "pays now" is supported by a much strong currency vs THINGS. Check the course of PMs or $Oil, althrough PMs wer probably 50% undervalued.

And the demand for what you owe keeps increasing (it's a strong paper, why would any non G-7 balk at the acquisition?)
5/10 However today the cost of supporting the USD has to be paid in the current budget by the US gov, not backloaded by increases in #TSY holding or increase in Petrodollar, the opposite!
6/10 How so?
Demand for USD is propped by interest payments on Reserves. The #Fed has a cost of sterilization of M0, that leads to a budget shortfall. If you stop the stimuli to promote demand on USD, the USD falls, that's patently obvious & alluded to by Mr. Druckenmiller. Image
7/10 Now some people belive there is a USD squeeze. NO. The US gov PAYS in the budget to prop up the USD.
In a squeeze, not only you don't need to pay interest on M0. There is huge excess of private credit vs a tiny M0 base (2008). Massive M0 demand, you even need to print.
8/10 The keyword is PRIVATE CREDIT. GOV CREDIT IS NOT DEBT, IT'NOT REPAID, CONSTANTLY EXPANDED, it's money.

Unless US Gov cuts Gov spending you have constant excess of M0. Debt now compounded by the DIRECT COST OF PROPPING UP THE USD by paying interest on M0 to create demand.
9/10 And on the backend of the funding (long term #TSY), the foreign central banks KNOW you have a quasi fiscal deficit.

Hence Singapore just boosting its Gold reserve by 49% since end of 2022
10/10 The cost of propping up the USD, instead of being born by the Petrollar and backloaded by the expansion of #TSY holding by foreign central banks is NOW DIRECTLY FRONT-LOADED by Quasi Fiscal Deficit as a cost in US Budget.
@SamanthaLaDuc

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Connecting the Financial Dots with BigData (Graph)

Connecting the Financial Dots with BigData (Graph) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GraphFinancials

Mar 17
1/7 Few thoughts about the expansion of M0 that is not QE but seems like it could turn into it.

The #Fed has turned the spigots on BTFP. At first it looks like your traditional lender of last resort thing and backstop of credit.
2/7 However, the nature of the "credit" to be backstopped is very unusual. #TSY. If this facility does not revert quickly, continues to grow beyond the panic, the conclusion? The Treasury and the Fed have fully merged. The #Fed is just another (North) LATAM central bank.
3/7 What is also means is the bond stuffing is starting to make the banking system wobble and TSY are puked by the banking system. Kemmerer mentioned in 1920 that TSY are unsuited to be in the banking system for various reasons.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 28
1/8 FDIC Take aways last quarter:
Solid profitability last quarter, higher net interest margin, offset by lower non interest income, and higher non-interest expenses. Higher than pre-pandemic Image
2/8 Net interest margins are now higher than pre-pandemic. Raising rates have been great for banks. However the deposits are starting to catch, maybe 1-2 quarters before we roll-over in NIMs. Image
3/8 Very large non-realized losses that could be realized if the Banks need to raise liquidities. @rcwhalen @SamanthaLaDuc . HOWEVER the reserve coverage has never been better so, so need for liquidity not in the next few quarters. Not in the next 2 quarters? 1 in a million Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 24
1/15 Confusing flow of Funds and Dollar shortage

There were lots of screams about liquidity shortage for 6 months now. And now? More hikes needed.

Those screams are amusing considering that the central banks have been expanding the Monetary base the most in 3 centuries
2/15 I guess people confuse several things.
No Fuel in Capital Markets means Financial Assets down, But while there is a reason why Financial assets fall when there is a debt deflation crisis, it does not mean that financial assets falling equates debt deflation.
3/15 As mentioned by Henry Thornton Brilliantly in his 1802 book. Three are two reasons for FX moves. Flow of Funds (rates differentials) and trade.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(