I have had it with proaborts still using the dishonest Guardian photos. So here we go: 1) This is NOT what a miscarriage or an abortion looks like. This tissue has been rinsed of all blood in a fine sieve and the EMBRYO IS EITHER MISSING OR HIDDEN. We'll come back to this!
2a) At no point in development is a human strictly microscopic. Here are screen shots of an embryologist's video of human eggs next to a dime. The videos were taken with only his phone. L: 10 human eggs R: 1 human egg
2c) Throughout the internet you can find scientific and fertility sources confirming the visibility of a human egg, which is roughly .1mm or the size of a period " . "
3) The fertilized human egg, or zygote, is larger than the unfertilized human egg, roughly .7mm, and again visible to the naked eye: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55456….
4) Roughly 6-10 days after fertilization, or Week 4 of pregnancy, the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus. At this point most women still don't know they're pregnant, so very very few abortions happen at this stage.
5) By Week 5, a woman is just missing her first period, the embryo is growing rapidly and about the size of a sesame seed. Again, most abortions do NOT happen at this stage as most women are just finding out they're pregnant.
6) Now, about the MYA Network and the photos they provided for The Guardian and NYT articles! Here are photos of wks 4 & 5.
If they are wholly accurate, why is there so much less tissue in wk 5? Why has all the blood been rinsed out? Why don't they want to point out the embryo?
7) On their website, the MYA Network misleads women by showing them images of washed and sanitized tissue, and claiming the embryos are not visible. BUT if you dig further down on their page, you will find them getting a little closer to the truth:
8) So what do we really KNOW about embryos at this stage? Well, at wk 8 and 9 an embryo is about a 1/2" and 3/4" long respectively. Quite obviously visible to the naked eye.
9) So let's compare photos. Below is what the Guardian claims is a wk 7 pregnancy, alongside a photo of a wk 7 miscarried baby.
10) Perhaps this is why so many women who've experienced miscarriage (even pro-choice women) were angry at the Guardian for how they misrepresented pregnancy loss:
11) Let's compare!
- Guardian's 9 wk photo with embryo supposedly present but "not easily discernible"
- representation of 9 wk embryo roughly to scale at 1/2" HAD IT BEEN IN the photo
Where is the embryo? Is it missing or did they hide it? Why don't they want us to see it?
12) Let's compare again!
- Guardian's 9 wk photo again
- Lennart Nilsson's photo of an embryo at roughly the same stage, clearly visible within it's tissue
Shouldn't we be able to see an embryo of this size, shape, and color in the Guardian photo? Why can't we?
13) Let's compare again!
- Guardian's 9 wk photo again
- Another of Lennart Nilsson's photos of an embryo at roughly the same stage
14) So you really should be asking yourself, why are the MYA Network, the Guardian, NYT and so many others actively misleading you?
And what happens when a woman believes them but when aborting at 11 weeks expels a fully formed little baby?
15) Even if we give them the benefit of the doubt, assume they're trying to ease women's guilt, how does that help her in the long run? What happens when she suffers and later discovers (and she will discover) the truth about fetal development? Who will help her then? (18wks)
16a) At the very least, the pro "choice" movement should treat women with the respect and dignity they deserve and offer them INFORMED CHOICE.
Informed choice means treating them like adults, NOT children; telling them the truth, NOT sugar-coating to "protect" them. (10 wks)
16b) Informed choice means providing her with accurate information about her baby's size and development, as well as possible negative outcomes including physical risks and mental health risks including prolonged grief, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. (19 wks)
17) Well, that's all for now. It's been hours of putting this together and I gotta stop. I will add more if I think of anything!
Please share, bookmark, use ANY time you see someone using those crap Guardian pics.
Bring the light, my friends. Bring the LIGHT!
Dang it I forgot to add credits:
• Screen shots in 10 & 11 @secularprolife
• Miscarried babies 9 & 14, I forget! Baby Nelson I think was @LiveActionNews but not sure.
• Photos of embryos and fetuses Lennart Nilsson A Child is Born and Life mag
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Anyone familiar with alcoholism has to see that Kamala Harris has a drinking problem, right? 🧵
1. She's drunk in public and on video. She's not *stupid* or *awkward* or *joyful* She's drunk. Day drunk. On the job. In front of cameras. In front of kids. She's drunk.
Watch the videos and see for yourself.
2. Her campaign team and the Biden Admin manage her the way families attempt to manage alcoholic parents:
The campaign is hyper-controlling, keeping her from any situation that might expose her secret - hence not allowing her to speak off-script, and refusing press conferences.
The Biden Admin was unhappy with Kamala and reluctant to give her responsibility. Though the administration did not admit it publicly, aides and staff reported it to the press with enough regularity that it was considered basic fact.
3. The ENTIRE *JOY* CAMPAIGN IS AN ELABORATE COVER FOR HER PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS. It's the classic "Mom's not drunk, she's just really happy!" on a national scale.
It's like being gaslit by dysfunctional parents into pretending our alcoholic mom/aunt/grandma/whatever is just fine, thank you, keep smiling, the world is watching and if we pretend hard enough maybe we can fool ourselves into being happy, too! 🙄
1/ You'll have to up the volume but look at the kids' faces. They know.
2/ She even looks a mess here...
3/ OMG this one. It's like she thinks the mask will hide it so she doesn't have to...
He wouldn’t settle for beating her up.
He had to sexually assault her as well.
He’s not a competitor. He’s a predator.
Shout out to @TruthAgape for pointing out what I missed!
#IStandWithAngelaCarini
@femaxxnews
I am reading reports and learning more about Imane. It is difficult to tell what is true and what isn’t true, but even if this person was raised as a girl and is not “trans” but rather has a sex disorder, there still must be criteria in place to protect women in sports.
If Imane is indeed biologically male, and failed the qualifications through IBA, then preventing competition against females is NOT discriminatory.
It’s merely protecting the other women involved.
Such rulings are NOT unkind or lacking compassion. The line must be drawn somewhere. It sucks when those lines limit us, but that happens every day in life to all sorts of people for a thousand and one reasons. Can’t be a rockette if you’re not tall enough. Can’t be a pilot if you have seizures. Can’t be surgeon if you have unsteady hands. Can’t drive a car if you’re blind.
And still, Imane never should have smacked Angela’s breast.
My heart is broken 💔: As friends & family know, I got pregnant at 15.
Unfortunately for people like me, living in Connecticut at the time, that was only the beginning of my nightmare.
All my life, family, friends, teachers, reporters…
…even celebrities told me that abortion was no big deal, that it just removed a clump of cells, and afterward life would return to normal.
They even said it was a woman’s right, and that abortion would make me stronger, freer, and more successful…
…So I went to my mom’s OB/GYN to schedule an abortion.
What I NEEDED to happen was for him to tell me the truth about my baby, about how far along I was, and about the physical and emotional consequences of abortion. I thought it was early - only 12 weeks…
Just a reminder that I had an abortion at age 15 with zero opposition to abortion. I believed it was just tissue and I was exercising my right as a woman. I was not raised in a Christian home or culture and no one told me it was wrong.
…of people like the aptly named “cage” I couldn’t place the pain.
For years, I believed the lie that abortion doesn’t harm women, and so for years, I tried to blame my struggles on anything else.
So many of the people recovering from abortion wounds tell a similar story….
Like all trauma, abortion trauma is commonly repressed for a time.
It can be decades before something brings it to the surface - the birth or loss of a child, the “empty nest,” the sound of a dentist’s drill, a fetal ultrasound image, bumping into the father/mother…
Abortion coercion is so effective because it takes only a little drop to poison the whole well:
Humans are social creatures. We require community for survival. Rejection is the near-equivalent to a death sentence for social creatures.
1/
When a woman is pregnant she is at her most vulnerable and she knows it on an instinctual level. She is keenly aware that she needs her community to survive.
So when her community abandons her or threatens to do so (overtly or by implication), she slips into survival mode.
2/
That community includes her partner, parents, siblings, friends, employers, coworkers, doctors, mentors, etc - anyone on whom she relies for her physical, emotional, social, or financial survival.
If any one them pressures her to abort, she will likely feel threatened.
3/
THREAD: PROBLEMS WITH THE TURNAWAY STUDY
This is a resource for you to save and use later. But also it was a ton of work, so maybe read it at least once. Because you love me!
OK here we goooooo!!!!
1/
CONDUCTED BY THE PRO-ABORTION ADVOCACY GROUP, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH). Although this does not automatically discredit the Turnaway Study, it's worth noting that they have a clear interest in a certain outcome.
2/
While ANSIRH's website uses disarming euphemisms like "reproductive well-being," a quick perusal reveals that the organization is staunchly proabortion. They also rely on the Turnaway Study for many of their claims.
3/