ChrisO_wiki Profile picture
May 1, 2023 60 tweets 15 min read Read on X
1/ The excellent @IanMatveev has done another deep dive into military strategy in Ukraine – this time a look at the geographical considerations of a possible Ukrainian counter-offensive in the south. See below for a translation (long thread ahead!). Image
2/ From @IanMatveev: The Ukrainian counter-offensive will certainly begin in the near future. What will it be like? It is quite possible that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will attack in the direction of Melitopol and Crimea. Let's analyse such an offensive's main elements.
3/ On the Zaporizhzhia front, Ukrainian forces can advance in two main directions - to Melitopol and Mariupol. I wrote about the pros and cons of both options here: t.me/arrowsmap/18 . Today we'll study one of them in detail – the one that I think is preferable.
4/ We will talk about the main aspects of the offensive:
1. The battlefield
2. Opposing forces
3. Attack preparation
4. The beginning of the breakthrough
5. Key points
6. Difficult moments
7. The main stages ⬇️
5/ Part 1 - the battlefield

I assume that the battle will take place on a 70 km wide strip from Kamianske to Huliaipole and further south, possibly gradually shifting to the west. This entire area is completely open and observable. Image
6/ On the one hand, tracked vehicles can easily drive straight across the fields, on the other hand, it will be easier to detect and destroy them with artillery fire. This is similar to what’s happened with Russian tanks near Vuhledar and Avdiivka.
7/ The main water obstacle is the Molochna River, but it stretches from north to south, along the direction of the main strike. Reliable crossings over it, although extremely desirable, are not vital. Image
8/ There is also the Tokmachka River and two small rivers with inlets in Kamianske and Vasylivka. The other small rivers are easily crossed with a minimal number of engineering devices, which the AFU will certainly have.
9/ Let's look at the elevation map as well. Only the left flank has a clear elevation. In general there is no great need to capture it. Although of course this is a convenient position for artillery and it would be nice to get control over it. Image
10/ But then you would need additional forces and it would probably be easier to suppress the batteries with air strikes and HIMARS.
11/ The network of relatively good roads is dense, with at least three adequate supply routes, among them a large main highway that armoured vehicles will not wreck. This is important, among other things, because the roads are convenient for moving troops in armoured vehicles. ImageImage
12/ Overall, I would say the battlefield is convenient for a breakthrough and a quick offensive. There are no significant obstacles and the defenders can only cling to populated areas.
13/ On the other hand the attackers have a disadvantage as well – it is difficult to find a line for an operational pause from where to repel Russian counterattacks.
14/ Therefore, the offensive must progress quickly, otherwise the AFU may find itself in uncomfortable positions at a difficult moment.
15/ Part 2 – opposing forces.

Given the three directions of attack (Vasylivka, Tokmak and Polohy), the AFU would need at least three mixed mechanised brigades with tanks, self-propelled artillery and BMPs. Image
16/ It would also need fast wheeled armoured vehicles (or the equivalent number of small units).

At the same time it is necessary to have 1-2 brigades in reserve in order to send them immediately to the breakthrough where it is possible to overcome the first line.
17/ In addition, 3-4 motorised infantry brigades are needed to support the offensive and block the enemy in key areas.

If the offensive follows the largest possible route, the defence lines would be 200 kilometres long in the west and east. Image
18/ Ukrainian brigades usually hold a length of 8-15 kilometres of front line. The Ukrainians can extend this to 20, using flexible defences based on population centres, as well as territorial defence brigades, so at least 10 brigades are needed.
19/ In total, the AFU needs six brigades in the first echelon, three more in the second, and approximately 10 in the third. Add artillery, air defence, and support services and you get a grouping of 130,000 or more with a basic brigade strength of 6,000. Image
20/ This would require at least 120-150 tanks (one battalion per mechanised brigade) and 300+ BMPs and APCs.
21/ At the front there is the 128th separate mountain brigade, the 65th mechanised brigade, two territorial defence brigades and three national guard brigades. With 7 units the line of defence, by the way, is 70 kilometres long.
22/ There are no available forces for the offensive – they are now in reserve.
23/ As for the Russian troops, here we have to rely on old data. The front in this place is static and Russian sources themselves rarely report on particular units. For example, here's a post about the 291st Regiment, which is part of the 42nd Motorised Rifle Division. Image
24/ But it is very stretched out and is said to be here only in Polohy (by this regiment) or in Robotyne by another source – uacontrolmap.com. The main force is the 19th Motorised Rifle Division – about 11,000 men, 120 tanks and 300+ armoured vehicles.
25/ Other powerful Russian units include the 64th Motorised Rifle Brigade, the 11th Airborne Assault Brigade and the 45th Special Forces Brigade. As well as a fairly large contingent from the Luhansk and Donetsk 'Democratic Republics' and even probably Wagner.
26/ According to another source: the 1430 Motorised Rifle Regiment, 177 Motorised Rifle Regiment, 22nd Special Forces Brigade and 37th Motorised Rifle Brigade.
27/ On paper it amounts to the equivalent of 4 brigades, with another 2-3 brigades similar in strength to the territorial defence and additional units.
deepstatemap.live/#10/47.4694/35…
28/ The combat effectiveness and equipment of these troops raises big questions. All the reserves go to other directions, probably here there is a shortage of modern tanks (T-62s were brought to this section of the front) and ammunition.
29/ But the Armed Forces of Ukraine will address these issues at the stage of preparation for the attack.

Speaking of the forces of Putin's army, one must not forget the fortifications. Those lines of trenches and concrete pyramids (here is a good map: google.com/maps/d/viewer?…).
30/ On their own they do not pose a great threat and are even detrimental to the defence – you can literally see them from the satellite view.

The Ukrainians will know in advance where these lines are, and will be able to allocate tasks to destroy them in advance. ImageImageImageImage
31/ In some places they will just bypass them. Some positions are in blatantly dumb places. But they can still give some benefit to the defence, including through the use of mines.
32/ On the overall map, we can draw several conclusions:

1. There are two main lines of defence, located close to each other (from 16 to 4.5 km).

2. The Mykhailivka-Mala Bilozerka area is the most heavily covered. Image
33/ 3. The line along the route E105 protects against an attack from the east after the forcing of the river.

4. Melitopol is almost not covered by these fortifications, but Tokmak is encircled by them.

5. The lines often rely on populated areas. Image
34/ The overall picture is that the Russian Army would prefer to hold the left flank and is ready to let the AFU attack on the right, in order to then defend Tokmak and the Molochna River line.
35/ The lack of dense coverage of the E105 route is a big mistake. But of course focusing only on these crude trenches is not worth it.
36/ Part 3 – attack preparation

Talking about basic preparations like reconnaissance and camouflaging of the advancing forces, creating forward depots and working out plans and everything else makes little sense.
37/ Separately, I want to discuss the strikes on the Russian troops that we should expect from the AFU.
38/ A couple of weeks or even a month in advance, exhausting strikes can begin, the purpose of which is to deprive the Russian army of operational resources for repair and replenishment.
39/ For example, if a bridge is destroyed, a rapidly erected replacement will be installed. This means that when another or the same bridge is bombed on the day of the offensive, there will no longer be such structures left in the warehouse for quick repairs.
40/ It is the same with ammunition depots. If bombed in advance, of course new structures will eventually be brought in. But there will be no more left where they are brought from. Besides, when the front is calm, things can be prioritised.
41/ Well, why do you need this spare highway – we'll fix it later somehow. Three warehouses burned down, but you don't need that many – let's rebuild one somewhere else for now.

As a result, logistics can become much more vulnerable to attack just before the offensive.
42/ So, where and what to attack? In my opinion, the key targets are:

Melitopol airfield.

One of the Russian military bases is located there and there are other facilities under military control in and around the city, they can also come under attack, as before. Image
43/ Dzhankoi railway junction

Here everything is obvious. Not only does the railway run through this junction to the west - to Sevastopol, but also to the north through Chonhar to Melitopol. In fact, Dzhankoi is the second Crimean bridge. Image
44/ The Fedorivka railway junction in Novobohdanivka

An important junction at the intersection of roads running from east to west and north to south. Not globally important, but important for the movement of forces directly during combat.
45/ Volnovakha railway junction

This is the starting point for the railway leading west approximately in the middle of occupied territory. Also important for supply and troop movement.
46/ Bridges on the Molochna river

The river crosses the combat zone and it is vital for the Russian army to keep crossing it. Only one bridge can be restored if two or three are destroyed. And when it gets hot, it will be too late to repair the other two. Image
47/ Bridges near Chonhar and Syvash

Difficult targets, also because of the distance and the strength of the bridges themselves. But if they are damaged, even for a short time, it could upset the overall balance of military supplies, which probably go in part just through Crimea. Image
48/ Bridges over the Crimean Canal

Destroying these bridges could deprive the grouping at the mouth of the Dnipro of normal communications with the front. It will come in handy, including during the third phase of the offensive (more on this later).
49/ Obytichna River bridges

The Obytichna is like the Molochna, only further east. Several important bridges are there, including one that carries the "land corridor." Several other rivers in the area flow into the Sea of Azov. All the bridges over them could become targets.
50/ Berdiansk oil depots and port

Berdiansk is the nearest major port through which to supply the Russian grouping on the Zaporizhzhia front. If it is damaged, the occupation forces will lose another supply route (or it will become less effective).
51/ S-300/400 air defence positions and radars

Their location should be clarified by Ukrainian intelligence, but it is unlikely that they are only in Crimea. Image
52/ These are the most dangerous and relatively non-mobile anti-aircraft complexes. The Russian command usually groups them in divisions, creating entire bases.

Military bases all along the Zaporizhzhia front will also come under attack, targeted from satellite images.
53/ While the Russian army recovers what it can, reconnaissance will trace the most important logistics lines, determine the enemy's priorities, its reserve depots and lines.
54/ A general strike map might look something like this: Image
55/ Immediately before the attack, HIMARS and artillery will hit the nearest warehouses, troop locations, the railway junction in Tokmak and identified particularly important objects like radars (using AGM-88 HARM missiles) or locations of soldiers and Rosgvardia members.
56/ Another type of preparation is exhausting attacks/fire along the front lines. Here it is important not to overdo it and not to suffer heavy losses, and better to do without them at all. Now this is more than realistic with the help of drones.
57/ You can triple the massive pressure from the air for 3-4 days or even a week in a row by dropping grenades and with pinpoint artillery. The important thing is that this should be done not only in the intended direction of the breakthrough, but everywhere.
58/ This is so that Russian force commanders have to react everywhere and disperse reinforcements to reinforce the entire front line. For example, here is what Russian war criminal Igor Girkin writes: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChrisO_wiki

ChrisO_wiki Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisO_wiki

May 18
1/ Could Yevgeny Prigozhin have become Russia's equivalent of Ukraine's Robert 'Madyar' Brovdi if he had been allowed to live? A provocative Russian commentary suggests that Wagner's 'civilian-controlled military' operating model could have been applied more widely by Russia. ⬇️ Image
Image
2/ 'Russian Engineer' writes:

"The answers to the questions are about what changes allowed the enemy to halt the downward trend in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, which was clearly evident throughout 2025."
3/ "And now they're striking along the Novorossiya highway, and simultaneously in Moscow and Sevastopol.
Read 14 tweets
May 17
1/ Ukraine's massive penetration of Moscow's air defences is sparking a great deal of gloomy and angry commentary from Russian warbloggers. The military-technical Telegram channel 'Atomic Cherry' warns of an escalating trend of Ukrainian capabilities. ⬇️
2/ "As an interim observation, I will note that the Armed Forces of Ukraine, for the first time in years of the conflict, have succeeded in destroying a number of targets in the Moscow region:

1) Solnechnogorsk loading station;
2) Angstrem JSC enterprise;
3) Elma Technopark;
3/
4) Transneft oil storage facility;
5) Kapotnya oil refinery.

There are a number of statements and testimonies about hits on other targets as well, but listing them all makes no sense. The trend is clear without this.
Read 30 tweets
May 17
1/ The Russian government is warning that the Ukrainians are trying to buy Russian Telegram channels that are now unprofitable after the government's blocking of the app. Russian commentators say it's an inevitable result of the government's restrictive policies. ⬇️ Image
2/ Russia has been severely restricting Telegram since the start of April, as well as making it retrospectively illegal to use Telegram for advertising. This has been a disaster for Russian businesses, for which Telegram was an essential marketing tool.
3/ Individual Telegram bloggers have also faced a collapse in their income from Telegram, both because of the advertising ban and due to the blocking reducing their user bases (though many Russians continue to access it through VPNs). Some are now trying to sell their channels.
Read 33 tweets
May 16
1/ Russia's anti-drone defences are said to be severely hampered by bureaucracy, such as bans on interceptor drones with explosive warheads, and legal liability, which makes mobile fire teams liable for damage caused by shot-down enemy drones. ⬇️
2/ Russian drone developer Alexey Chadayev looks for answers to the eternal question of "where air defence?". He highlights legal and bureaucratic obstacles that he says are major obstacles to the effective protection of facilities that are being targeted by Ukrainian drones:
3/ "A few thoughts on counter-drone defence of rear-area facilities.

1. The very fact that we have legally limited the ability to use explosives to combat drones in the rear leads to an increase, not a decrease, in collateral losses.
Read 12 tweets
May 16
1/ The Poseidon intercontinental nuclear torpedo is a very stupid idea, says Russian writer and blogger Maxim Kalashnikov. He lambasts it as a huge waste of Russia's resources which is likely to be highly vulnerable to interception and wholly ineffective in practice. ⬇️ Image
2/ Recent reports that the much-hyped Poseidon will soon be undergoing sea trials on a purpose-built carrier submarine have attracted a scathing response from Kalashnikov. He bluntly dismisses it as a very expensive and militarily pointless propaganda exercise:
3/ "I look upon the cult of the “Poseidon” torpedo with disdain. Is it aimed at complete idiots whose minds have been shaped by Hollywood and who’ve forgotten their high school physics? Or at impressionable retirees?
Read 20 tweets
May 15
1/ Russia's shrunken Victory Day parade in Moscow on 9th May has been a TV ratings flop, reflecting a lack of public interest and its exceptionally short duration. Russian broadcasters report 25% fewer people tuning in this year. ⬇️
2/ The Russian news outlet 'We can explain' reports that the combined rating for the Victory Day Parade broadcast across the three main broadcasters (Channel One, Rossiya 1, and NTV) this year was only 16%. This is a near-25% drop from the 20.5% rating recorded in 2025.
3/ The parade was overtaken in the ratings by the wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. 'We can explain' suggests that this "may be due to the show's shortening and watering down."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(