1) Something (very stupid) you’re going to see over the next weeks are people arguing that screenwriters are being unreasonable. “Times have changed”. No. Times WERE changed. By SOMEBODY. By PEOPLE, making CHOICES.
2) There’s an unfortunate tendency in modern American thought to write about economies, or markets, like they’re the weather. Like they’re natural phenomena, you know, “ market forces”, the invisible hand, etc, shit just happens, can’t be helped!
3) Bullshit. Economies, markets, are products of human thought. They are shaped by the rules we place upon them and distorted by the will of those who operate within them.
4) The Hollywood market is currently being distorted by choices made by powerful people with considerable agency. The most foolish of these choices is to no longer make the metric of success be … well, success.
5) The bosses of these companies have stopped caring about whether the shows and movies are profitable — because THEY ARE, we know they are, the companies have made between $28-30 BILLION in profit — PROFIT — *every year for the last five years*.
6) They’ve decided to chase the classic techbro, financialization metric, the mania of modern Wall Street — growth. Nonstop growth. Something you can base stock options on. But as the man says, the only thing that grows forever is cancer, and even that eventually kills the host.
7) The new robber barons of Hollywood are on a suicide run. They’ll extract as much wealth out of the system as they can before it crashes, and they’ll beat up the workforce as much as they need to to create “savings” to make Wall Street happy, to stretch out the run.
8) THIS IS NOT NEW. This is classic vulture capitalism, this is what happened to K-mart, Toys R’ US, this is airline stock buybacks, it’s just moved from hard infrastructure and retail to the information and entertainment world.
9) So this struggle may seem like a very specialized conflict, between a very small Guild of unusual professionals and their very specific employers. But this is 100% part of the larger madness that’s drowning the modern economy. It’s all the same fight, this one’s just nerdier.
10) The WGA is just lucky — and not really lucky, we’re benefitting from 90 years of other writers sacrificing for us — that we happen to be organized enough and powerful enough, when our turn came, to draw a line.
11) (Spoiler alert for other unions and workers -- your time will always come)
12) There’s a well-established, profitable system to make quality entertainment that keeps everybody happy, healthy, paid, and in shape to make their best possible work, for the delight of millions of audience members. That system is being gutted, thanks to hubris and greed.
13) Man, I do not want to strike, None of us do. But if we don’t, mine is the last generation of screenwriters who will even have a chance to have a stable career.
14) We will damn all the screenwriters who come after us to a gig economy, with all that entails. I’ll go down swinging to stop that. I owe the writers who came before and those who come after.
15) See you on the line tomorrow, and every day, for as long as it takes. #WGAStrong
PS your usual reminder that once a thread hits 1k RT’s I’m no longer in the Replies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A hundred years from now historians will be writing "Fascism in the mid 20th century looked like X, but then in the early 21st Century American fascism manifested in form Y" and everybody splitting hairs will be in the dustbin.
It helps that I consider fascism a social movement that occasionally gains political power rather than a purely political construct. Fascism is the appendix of modern democracy. Always there, and it occasionally flares up and kills the host.
One of the challenges of the American system is that the Founding Fathers worked really hard to make sure we didn't have a king, but a healthy chunk of Americans REALLY WANT A KING.
A Congressperson is just a person. A Supreme Court Justice is just a person. A President is just a person, and a former President is *really* just a person. Other democratic countries indict their President (or President equivalent) *all the time*.
Why was there a taboo? Why *should there be* a taboo? An unhealthy side effect of the already unhealthy American exceptionalism is that our government officials are soaked in magic City on a Hill dust.
This Dollar General thread reminds me of something I've been grappling with writing about in a longer format -- in an extremely religious country, or at least a country heavily influenced by its religious roots, the classical sin of greed just ... gets a pass.
And before you answer "yes, well, that's capitalism" there's capitalism in other countries where this weird ... not just acceptance but emotional valorization of exploitation is not cultural currency.
If I, a humanist who operates from a pretty classic virtue ethics framework, and a religious person in this country sat down, there's a lot of stuff we'd agree about, using that old framework!
1) Ages ago, back when the Silly puppy thing was happening in scifi (tl:dr white dudes angry that it was no longer the 50's) I wrote about the difference between escaping into* science fiction and escaping *through* science fiction.
2) People who escape *into* it want it to be safe from the outside world, it's an emotional refuge and should be unchanging. People who escaped *through* it, like I did, want it to be the passageway to NEW STUFF, be it images, cultures, ideas, etc.
3) This is an element of why the Clarkesworld problem (tl:dr swamped with AI stories) is coming up -- we have a shitload of bros who do not understand the purpose of art, or fiction, or only understand their use of it
I'm amused, and I admit probably not well-educated enough in political history to understand, the strain of comments I'm getting that "it's hypocritical of rich people to criticize other rich people". So only poor people with no reach or influence can morally criticize the rich?
That last thing we need is people with influence and power urging limits on influence and power. That's a neat trick. Follow that argument and see where it gets you. That's internalized ... something?
Folks, you can be a successful participant in the (incredibly distorted and flawed) free market and still see the excesses of end stage capitalism. Cancer's not even good for cancer, it kills the host.
It amusing on a post about how one of the problems in modern society is that there are a bunch of shitty little billionaire enablers running around making sure rich people’s feelings aren’t hurt, one of the minions decided to prove my point.
Somebody’s very mad, BY PROXY, I made fun of, not even a single billionaire, but billionaires as a group, and that the post below (insanely, and why?) got 715,000 views, and decided *on their own* to fill out a form to bootlick! Snitch culture, it’s the vibe of the 2020’s!