Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
May 2 11 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A fascinating and important war between Brazil and Google:

Lula wants a law to regulate social media, punish them for hosting "disinformation" and "hate speech."

Google is campaigning against it.

Lula's Justice Minister is threatening criminal action against Google for that. Image
The proposed law does much more than just allow this kind of censorship. It also governs profits between media and Big Tech (Brazil's huge media corporations are campaign as hard in favor of the law).

But this is the law I've been warning about: the kind in UAE and Singapore.
Yesterday, a CNN Brasil host claimed she was being censored by Twitter for supporting this law. Sleeping Giants Brasil (yes, it's there) claimed the same. Lula's Justice Minister cited it, vowed criminal investigations.

It was all false: just Twitter's global tech problem. ImageImage
This matters so much beyond Brazil because it's the first attempt in the democratic world to implement state "regulations" of internet speech this extreme. Europe also wants it and is using Brazil as a test case. And, of course, US Dems want it, too.

greenwald.locals.com/post/3585012/n…
My thread in Portuguese on all of this is here:

Sorry for so many Portuguese tweets today but the law the Brazilian government wants to pass is genuinely dangerous, and the behavior of both the state and the corporate media (100% in favor) is infuriating.

We'll report on it tonight on @SystemUpdate_, live at 7pm ET.
A @CNNBrasil reporter, @DanielaLima_, went on air live to claim Twitter was censoring her tweets because she supports this law. Sleeping Giants did the same. Brazil's Justice Minister re-tweeted it, vowing criminal investigations.

The whole story was laughably false, disproven.
Every tweet from these journalists and politicians who claimed Twitter was censoring them yesterday has a Community Note attached, with a Reuters report showing it happened to thousands: due to Twitter's tech failures.

They just ignore it, won't correct it. It's maddening. ImageImage
Brazil's Supreme Court justice who has become such an extreme censor that even the Western press objected, Alexandre de Moraes, just ordered the executives of Google, FB and Spotify to Brazil's FBI-equivalent to be interrogated on their opposition to the proposed internet law. Image
All of Brazil's largest media outlets are spouting non-stop propaganda in favor of this internet control bill. They want to bar the internet as a means to oppose them, and will receive ample profit.

But the state is all but criminalizing opposition to the law by tech companies.
This is a fascinating but deeply alarming war right now between the Brazilian government and social media (Google/FB/Twitter).

I don't think anything like this has happened before. The war to take away the internet as a means of dissent is very real, and is coming to you.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

May 2
Mais uma vez, Moraes emitiu uma ordem de ofício - impedindo Google, FB e Spotify de criticar o PL e ordenar que seus executivos sejam interrogados pela PF - sem qualquer provocação do MPF ou de qualquer outra pessoa. Outra decisão tomada com base em seu próprio arbítrio. Image
Enquanto isso, aqui está a Globo - de longe o mais agressivo e importante apoiador dessa lei - ameaçando a todos que melhor se submeterem a essa lei porque, senão, o STF fará esses controles sem voto, e será muito mais rígido:

Já fiz reportagem sobre política em muitos países. Isso é autoritarismo tão explícito quanto eu já vi. Banir críticas às leis que a Globo e o governo apóiam, e ameaçar os críticos com interrogatórios na PF, é o mais extremo possível. Mas está tudo de acordo com a própria lei.
Read 4 tweets
May 2
Como é possível que esses 2 tweets - alegando que o Twitter censurou pessoas a favor do PL das Fake News - ainda estejam no ar e sem correção? Eles foram absolutamente provados como falsos.

Não se recuse a corrigir seus erros, depois se pergunte por que ninguém confia na mídia.
Milhares e milhares de pessoas que nunca falaram sobre o PL das Fake News ou que falaram contra (como eu) sofreram os mesmos problemas ontem porque - como noticiou a Reuters - havia problemas técnicos sistêmicos no Twitter. As provas:👇👇👇 ImageImageImage
"Checagem" é só para o povo - não para os grandes jornalistas da grande mídia, que são livres para espalhar falsidades sem necessidade de retratar ou corrigir.

E a cultura do grande mídia - nenhum jornalista jamais responsabilizará os outros por seus erros - é errada e doentia. ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
May 2
Muito embaraçoso:

Ontem, tanto a @DanielaLima_ da CNN quanto o @slpng_giants_pt alegaram que estavam sendo censurados pelo Twitter (é hilário ver o Sleeping Giants indignado sobre censura).

O @FlavioDino usou isso para ameaçar as investigações criminais.

Mas foi falso. Veja: ImageImageImageImage
Todo mundo comete erros. Mas esse é o ponto.

São *estas* as pessoas em quem você confia com o poder de determinar o que é verdadeiro e falso e banir seu discurso com base nisso?

Essa é a pergunta @JoelPinheiro85 nesta excelente coluna da Folha:

www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/joel-p…
Veja o pânico e a paranóia que espalharam o dia todo. Tb fui repetidamente desconectado do Twitter. Foi um problema técnico do site. Esses "guerreiros contra a desinformação" se transformaram em mártires da censura e provocaram uma investigação criminal:

Read 9 tweets
May 1
No, the biggest victims of the war in Ukraine are the tens of thousands of Ukrainian men forced against their will as conscripts to serve as cannon fodder so that empty and weak Western losers like you can feel a sense of purpose and strength as you cheer from a safe distance.
Whenever it comes to wars people get to cheer without fighting in them -- call it the Bill Kristol Syndrome -- you can never underestimate the ample psychological benefits they get from feeling strong and tough but never getting near the fight. Adam Smith warned of it in 1776: Image
For those who love to cheer the war in Ukraine but seem to have no idea what it's actually about, here's just the latest instance in which Zelensky had to increase punishments for desertion because of how unwilling much of the conscript army is to fight:

kyivindependent.com/zelensky-signs…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
That a bunch of coddled, high-paid, risk-free employees of media corporations sanctimoniously praised themselves as avatars of press freedom -- without once mentioning Julian Assange, while paying homage to the politician imprisoning him -- is as grotesque as it is unsurprising.
That they all swooned in their evening wear, taking selfies with mid-level celebrities, without mentioning Assange in their "press freedom" homages is even more notable given that he has broken more major stories - by far - than everyone in that room:

That the most common response to this is that Assange somehow "isn't a journalist" speaks volumes.

To begin with, he's won more major global journalism awards than most in that room. 👇

But it shows what they think "journalism" is: calling CIA and writing down what they say. ImageImageImageImage
Read 14 tweets
Apr 28
This week, the liberal @TheProspect published multiple op-eds on Tucker identical to every other: he's racist, evil Satan.

Just *one* op-ed included a few paragraphs of some (true) nuance on why he differs from the old Fox mold. Dems revolted. And its editor quickly apologized:
I've long considered the editor, @ddayen, a very good, fair, diligent journalist.

But if you publish a well-written op-ed by your staff writers and immediately back down because a Twitter mob spews rage, then apologize and throw them overboard, that's cowardly and wrong.
The establishment liberals viewed is shaped by this infantile dichotomy. *Everyone* is either:

1) A DNC loyalist, or,

2) A KKK racist and Nazi genocidist.

For those in 1), no criticisms are allowed. For those in 2), no nuance is permitted.

That was the rule violated here.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(