Laura Poirot Profile picture
May 3 16 tweets 8 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Sure, Jan. Her new birthday on Aug 4 with Gan-Gan, buys Diana's watch and wears her perfume before meeting Harry. Netflix really did a number on Nut. Image
#DoBetter 🤣🤣🤣 and please get your birthday right Nut. Since 2012, you have shared with us the wrong date of birth. I mean, Todge even forgot your birthday was in June before "writing" *cough** his book.
You weren't involved, obviously.
Meg who has missed her period but continues to drink alcohol. End of Summer in UK 2018 was Sep 23. Meg was already teasing she was pregnant by Sep 6. I mean, can this get any worse?
Image
Oh, this does get worse.
So this "visit" was meant to be before Nut knew she was pregnant, "toward" the end of Summer.
The Queen supposedly wasn't there. Was just Prince Charles bonding with them both. She received a phone call from the Queen because she had written to her, Image
to ask for her advice regarding her Father; to which the Queen suggested writing him a letter.
There are many issues here:
1. They went to Balmoral Aug 25-26
2. FOR the Queen
3. Not Castle of Mey
4. Castle of Mey week visit happened Jul 26, early Summer 2018 with PC/KC ImageImage
5. Meg conceived Aug 6, so this made-up trip late Aug she was already pregnant
6. Meg had already written to the Queen, surely with her calligraphy skills she could write to her Father
5. Oops, she had already drafted the letter to her Father Aug 22 before this late Summer trip ImageImage
Even after the lawsuit with @DailyMailUK and Knauf, they STILL lie in Spare. This book would have been legally proofread by @penguinrandom and, despite Meg lying in court, they STILL allowed them both to lie under the Monarchy @RoyalFamily @KensingtonRoyal and under HMTQ
6. The real trip to see the Queen 25-26 Aug, not Prince Charles, was due to her Father's interviews supposedly
7. But that last interview of Thomas Markle happened 29 July 2018, and she had already drafted him that letter with Knauf 3 days before the trip, 22 August 2018. Image
On Aug 22, Knauf asked if Nut was OK after writing it. She replied: “Honestly Jason I feel fantastic. Cathartic and real and honest and factual.”
So, she sealed the deal but decided to glorify herself by involving HMTQ with no truth to the matter. Image
So she was fully healed from her father before she toyed with the @RoyalFamily she was a damsel in distress requiring help on how to stop her father constantly abusing her via the media.
Todge did not just know this when it happened, but he then published these lies in Spare.
You should be ashamed of yourselves.
A reminder she blamed the @RoyalFamily and indirectly, HMTQ, for writing that letter. She blamed the week spent at Castle of Mey with Prince Charles- the one they're recreating in Spare-- as to why she wrote the letter. Not out of compassion or love for her father, not from Image
The advice imparted by our soon-to-be King.
She didn't reveal this truth herself. The lawsuit revealed it by way of Jason Knauf.
If Knauf did not supply those texts, the lies of Todge and Nut would be what we would only be able to see.
This is the true level of this depravity. Image
After that week at Castle of Mey, with King Charles harassing and haranguing Todge to stop Thomas Markle from doing more interviews with British tabloids, eventhough Nut was also present, it had taken her over 2 weeks to act and write that letter.
Her power play comes first.
Exclusion clause* insert** in case anyone comes back to me with:
a) @DailyMailUK @DailyMail being an evil tabloid that spits lies to harm Meghan, when just before they published that letter, they were taking her side; and
b) Nut never seeing the Queen regarding her father.
🚪 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laura Poirot

Laura Poirot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thelaurapoirot

May 5
You know, when you have a feeling something is off?
It could be nothing, but the same year? ImageImage
Coincidence? ImageImageImageImage
Image
Read 17 tweets
May 4
There are many images with missing body features. Nut is missing a finger but this image has not been digitally enhanced has it?
No-ear Lilibet Image
4-digit Archie? Image
Read 4 tweets
May 4
Another cracker.
Nut tries to cover up she knew the gender of Archie, because it is against royal protocol, stripping him of titles.
But Nut demanded Lilibet's Princess title be acknowledged when HMTQ died, and registered those domains, despite breaking that very same protocol. Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
May 3
So, let me get this straight. In 2018:

Sep 6 Meg teased she was pregnant.

She would have only been 2 months, 2 days (9 weeks and 1 day) far if 42.5 weeks full-term.

She would have only been 1 month 14 days (6 weeks and 3 days) far if 40 weeks full-term.

1st Trimester. Image
Giving you the best benefit of the doubt with those full-term calculations here Nut.
Sep 10 Doria is getting nanny lessons.

She would have only been 2 months, 5 days (9 weeks and 4 days) far if 42.5 weeks full-term.

She would have only been 1 month 17 days (6 weeks and 6 days) far if 40 weeks full-term.

1st Trimester. Image
Read 8 tweets
May 3
This has given me a good laugh today:

1. "Meghan is media savvy."
2. "Why wouldn’t she think her kids would have a title?"
1. "Meghan is media savvy."
Now a proven counterclaim, thanks to your comment>>
Afua Hirsch: "Harry and Meghan felt it necessary to protect their newborn baby from the media glare".
1. ""Why wouldn’t she think her kids would have a title?"
Now a proven counterclaim, thanks to your comment>>
Meganut: "In those months I was pregnant" "They didn't want him to be a prince or princess"; "It's not their right to take it away".
Read 11 tweets
May 2
So Meghan and Doria just proved that Archie was a month old prior to May 8 2019. So I was right.
First clip: Doria says she was already there for a month with Meg, Todge, presumably with baby, by May 8 photocall.
Meghan then states her Mother helped them with the baby for a month before returning to US and them needing a nanny. Can you believe this s**t?!
So my findings were and have always been correct, proving this whole pregnancy is a sham. @RoyalFamily I look forward to that OBE as a loyal servant to the Monarchy.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(