"As a result of this broadening of the way that autism and the autism spectrum are seen, the contributors’ view is that PDA is currently best understood as a
‘profile’ (or cluster of traits) on the autism spectrum."
PDA Society 2022, p3.
Above quote is from PDA Society's apparent research report pretending to be clinical guidance, p3.
"As a result of this broadening of the way that autism and the autism spectrum are seen, the contributors’ view is that PDA is currently best understood as a ‘profile’ (or cluster of traits) on the autism spectrum."
I think claim by PDA Society is blatant nonsense/ "bullshit".
Richard you have not said anything new here, why are you quoting that bold claim by PDA Society?
I want to create a diagram which effectively shows that claim by PDA Society is nonsense.
So how would show claim:
""As a result of this broadening of the way that autism and the autism spectrum are seen, the contributors’ view is that PDA is currently best understood as a ‘profile’ (or cluster of traits) on the autism spectrum.""
Is nonsense?
Simple to do what they say to include those traits as a cluster which is meant to be within autism spectrum. Problem is, when you do that, you show that PDA is blatantly NOT autism.
Create a diagram which has continua of PDA features with traits which are described in PDA at one end; i.e., clustering. When one does that is also shows that PDA is clearly NOT autism.
So the diagram should in some ways look like this one below, which has DSM-5 autism criteria versus PDA criteria in print. Image is from Woods 2021, p10.
Or something like the below image, but showing slightly different information.
Below images are the same image, but with text colours inverted for ease of access.
Image shows PDA features versus DSM-5 autism ones, with "Profound Autism" included for comparison.
Previous images text are showing to well. I have taken screenshots of the previous images, so hopefully people can access them better.
I should note previous diagrams are there basically showing the contrast between "perplexing" & "classic" autism as suggested by "PDA Profile of ASD" discourse. It does not represent my views on how autism should be constructed.
Below is a draft of one of the two new diagrams I am intending to make. This is a continuum of PDA's demand-avoidance to compliance with demands.
Does anyone have any feedback?
Latest draft of the diagram, if people would like to provide feedback.
Previous image is building on below table, which compares different PDA diagnostic thresholds with different diagnostic category thresholds in DSM-5.
The previous table information is mainly conveyed in below diagram, which shows PDA's internalising versus externalising continuum versus number of settings demand-avoidance presents in 2D model.
Below is the first draft of the second diagram I intended to create. It is "PDA Profile of ASD" constellation of traits within autism spectrum as claimed by PDA Society.
What do people think?
Below has 11 continua of features, which are representative of "PDA Profile of ASD" clinical descriptions, diagnostic & screening tools. Continuums are using red & green arrows. Red to note problematic ends & green to note "normal" ends of the continuums.
The diagram also has this text on it too:
"Please do not reify this diagram. Based on RW interpretations of “PDA Profile of ASD” clinical literature, diagnostic and screening tools."
I have revised this diagram to add a sentence about how it assumes demand-avoidance & hyper fawning are intrinsic features.
Just a bit more about this diagram. This is based on my own interpretation of "PDA Profile of ASD" clinical descriptions, diagnostic & screening tools. Hence, why I say PDA has normal "theory of mind"...
... This is because I am skeptical PDA intrinsically has any social communication issues, which I explain why here:
... I also explain here that there is essentially little-no good quality evidence to suggest PDA's social avoidance features are intrinsically done without intent: researchgate.net/publication/36…
Hopefully, people can see how my diagrams comparing "PDA Profile of ASD" to accepted autism understandings have similar aspects to them.
Below diagram challenges the bold claim:
"As a result of this broadening of the way that autism and the autism spectrum are seen, the contributors’ view is that PDA is currently best understood as a ‘profile’ (or cluster of traits) on the autism spectrum." PDA Society 2022, p3.
The two below diagrams are only drafts, I open to revising them based on feedback.
"Care Across Contexts: Ethics of Care and Relational Leadership Increasing Efficacy of Interventions for Disabled and Neurodivergent Learners"
Free to access Masters thesis arcabc.ca/islandora/obje…
I should warn people it discusses the use of ABA!
Beyond this, is this bit discussing PDA. From my perspective, is all the assumptions around this are problematic & worrying about where did the author find information providing such biased information?!?!?
At some point in the future, a committee, will decide if autism subtypes will be accepted again. Such committees are often open to political lobbying, e.g., lobbying by Autistics to exclude subtypes from DSM-5.
Unless others boldly claim you experience demand-avoidance differently to them, then apparently it is fair game to claim you do not have PDA.
Unless demand-avoidance is not an Autism feature?
In which case how can PDA be a "Profile of autism"?!?
No, autism is not centrally defined by demand-avoidance!
Yes, this is some of the fallacious logic (& claims) I have to deal with some from others.
It is an issue. Not only due to the distress such claims are causing me. Also due to issues those & others actions are having to those not blindly accepting "PDA Profile of ASD".
Next videos I wish to make:
Why I use a "post-Autistic" identity.
Commentary that those using problematic & controversial diagnoses have some ethical responsibility.
When will "PDA Profile of ASD" advocates stop their attacks: before, or after their attacks drive someone to suicide?!?
Last issue is bothering me a lot. Not only due to the effects of their attacks on me. Also that their is a pattern in their behaviour. One can reasonably label a dangerous group (ironically, how they label some critiquing PDA).
One would think after:
@milton_damian threatened to take legal action against Sally Cat for a defamatory petition which had 700+ responses in 48 hours in 2018.
Their attacks against Harry Thompson, apparently made HT heavily suicidal in 2023.
...
"Facing Change and Uncertainty: Lessons Learned from Autistic Children and their Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic"
Open access article link.springer.com/article/10.100…
This is one is interesting talking about demands. It also seems to talk about how avoidance is relating to anxiety (stress). There is also an example of demand-avoidance in their which highlights why proposed rational-irrational demand-avoidance split is problematic.
This one p9. It discusses how some children avoided demand to learn/ do education activities at home. While it is positioned as "refusal", it is a form of demand-avoidance. One can question if demand-avoidance is rational, or irrational in nature. Answer is subjective!
@milton_damian Does anyone else find it weird considering the high variation in clinical practice assessing autism; that "PDA Profile of ASD" advocates felt the need to prematurely define with a research report, that purports to provide guidance & identification on PDA?
Point here, is one can respect autism identifications from clinics with divergent assessment practices. Why should PDA identifications be treated any differently (if they do identify PDA)? Why should we view divergent PDA identifications as inferiors to others?
Highlight how weird it is some decided "their" PDA identifications better than others.
Suppose those clinics who have supposedly been over diagnosing PDA, got together produced a report on how to assess/ identify PDA & said all "PDA Profile of ASD" identifications are not PDA?!